Author Topic: We can land(ditch) on the water (Read 235 times)

BUG_EAF322 · « **on:** April 28, 2002, 11:47:51 PM »

Let's take off from it
I really would like to see a flying boat
the sunderland or the catalina.

Don't come with the crap talk they not suited for the MA
I think they are a challenge to fly

A good thing would be the u could spawn in near off boats and ports .
And the option to bring supply with em.

Karnak · « **Reply #1 on:** April 29, 2002, 12:21:20 AM »

The Sunderland and Catalina would be the wrong choices, IMO.

The H8K2 "Emily" was the most advanced flying boat of the war, and for quite a few years after. It was better armed, faster, tougher (possibly the toughest WWII aircraft of all), climbed faster and flew further. It was simply better.

It would also give the Japanese a somewhat usable bomber in the CT.

BUG_EAF322 · « **Reply #2 on:** April 29, 2002, 12:56:32 AM »

here we go advanced, better, higher ,lower, deeper,faster etc.
the catalinafor instance did some sorties

i don't wanna go dweebest just a plane wich is a challenge to fly
especially in the MA

one off the reasons i drive an old beetle it is more fun on the road
U guys are like the one wich always buys new car than get dissapointed when there is a new model on the market

Karnak · « **Reply #3 on:** April 29, 2002, 01:29:21 PM »

BUG,

The Japanese need more aircraft. We want a flying boat. Why not kill two birds with one stone?

gofaster · « **Reply #4 on:** April 29, 2002, 01:31:12 PM »

I'd like to see a Japanese flying boat/bomber - would be a good way to track the movement of enemy carrier groups and ground assaults.

BUG_EAF322 · « **Reply #5 on:** April 29, 2002, 01:49:18 PM »

coz u say it's a wrong choice
i won't say ur sushi floatplane is a bad one