Author Topic: Ta152, some facts.  (Read 1470 times)

Offline sling322

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3510
Ta152, some facts.
« Reply #45 on: June 01, 2002, 12:24:15 PM »
Great info.....I guess.  Would look even better in the correct forum.

Offline Sundog

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1781
Ta152, some facts.
« Reply #46 on: June 01, 2002, 05:59:12 PM »
Also,
From the same book on the Ta-152 series, the following figures were given for a Ta-152H-0, which is lighter than a Ta-152H-1. It doesn't clarify, but I am assuming the lower speed is without boost and the higher speed is with boost. Also, these speeds would 'obviously' be higher for the H-0 than the H-1 due to the
H-0's lower weight;

Alt (M)         Speed (KPH)
2100           390-430
2400           450-470
2700           490-510
3100           550


I would trust that data as a reference more so than the Ta-152A data, as the Ta-152A had the short wing.

Offline Glasses

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1811
Ta152, some facts.
« Reply #47 on: June 01, 2002, 07:16:40 PM »
My Main concern with Ah's Ta152 is that from the get go the auxiliary non Self Ceiling wing tanks  are filled with fuel.


I posted a thread a while back with the recommended fuel loadouts the ta152H-1 would have used  in the Winter of '45,which would be similarly loade in the same fashion the P51's aux tank is filled this might give the TA152 some help in the performance department without tweaking the model itself,by re arranging the way the fuel is set up in this plane and it might aliviate some of the problems in ragards to wing weakness.

Offline Wilbus

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4472
Ta152, some facts.
« Reply #48 on: June 02, 2002, 05:26:46 AM »
Roger Letwolf, however, they didn't brake off all that soon, but you may very well be right. There were some TA152's that were very at the deck though (Ta152H's NOT one of those).

Sundog, the Ta152H-0 didn't use any MW 50 or GM1 boost at all thus the speed down low of a TA152H-1 will be higher since the H1 used both MW50 and GM1.

The TA152H-0 used a Jumo 213E engine which wasn't ready for these kind of boost systems, The TA152H-1 used a Jumo 213E-1 which was fully ready for these boost systems.
Also, max speed in level flight doesn't quite change with weight, can test it with different fuel loadout, acceleration however in level flight is changed, the heavier it is the more power is needed to pull it. The H1 was quite much heavier but most of the new weight was the fuel.
Rasmus "Wilbus" Mattsson

Liberating Livestock since 1998, recently returned from a 5 year Sheep-care training camp.

Offline Sundog

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1781
Ta152, some facts.
« Reply #49 on: June 02, 2002, 04:36:51 PM »
Thanks Wilbus, all good points. I like flying the current Ta-152H-1 anyway, as many underestimate what it can do :) Not to mention it just looks good!
« Last Edit: June 02, 2002, 04:39:13 PM by Sundog »

Offline Wilbus

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4472
Ta152, some facts.
« Reply #50 on: June 02, 2002, 05:44:33 PM »
Rgr Sundog, love the plane aswell :)

But want it right ;)
Rasmus "Wilbus" Mattsson

Liberating Livestock since 1998, recently returned from a 5 year Sheep-care training camp.