Originally posted by midnight Target
This is often cited as a cause for more common sense in the legal system. I suggest you look into it further. McD's was not only aware of the "excessively" hot coffee they were serving, they knew it was dangerous and tried to cover it up. While there are many frivilous lawsuits out there, this isn't one of them.
[/b]
Apparently this would justify a million dollar lawsuit? They knew they were serving "dangerous coffee"...because it was too HOT? When I get a cup of coffee, the first thing I do is not pour it all over me, I set it on the table and let it cool down.
Anyway...what happens after the lawsuit midnight? Another classical US warning sign in the class of "caution. HOT, do not pour in knee or over small children", another rant "McD is not responsible for any damages caused by this cup of coffee"? Is that normal to you midnight? I find it f**king retarded.
Stuff like the lawsuits you have in the US wreaks havoc on your economy, and you dont even seem to realize/care. Do you remember a company called Texaco? You dont see that company around much nowadays, do you? Try to find out what happened to that company. (Hint: multi-billion dollar lawsuit over a pissant deal)
I understand that most americans hate lawyers, it is not wonder since 97% of US lawyers behaves like a combination of leeches and rats.
Tell you what, there are two simple things you should do that would get rid of 90% of all your twisted lawsuits.
1) Prohibit lawyers from taking out their pay in form of a percentage of an eventual "win".
2) Make the losing part in a private/civil lawsuit pay the lawyer costs for the winning side.
We have 1 and 2 in Sweden, and guess what, we dont have moronic lawsuits ala "oh, I broke a nail on the dashboard, sue Ford" or "oh I spilled coffee over me, sue McD" (Sue yourself you clumsy squeak).
Steve, an all white jury aquitted those police officers, which set off almost a week of rioting in LA. This was not justice and even the Federal Government agreed. Those same officers were later tried in a federal court and found guilty of denying King his civil rights. They all did time.
[/b]
And an all black jury freed OJ Simpson...but there cant possibly be anything f*cked up with the jury system now can it?
Anyway, you have to make up your mind, either you are innocent until proven guilty, or you are not. What way do you want it? Guilt by media coverage, or guilt (or non-guilt) by verdict in court? Besides, the jury that freed the King-policemen were not all white.
And exactly how f*cked up is it that a federal court finds the policemen guilty of violating his civil rights? In Sweden we dont allow people being tried twice for the same crime (albeit using a different law/rule).