If it's feasible and not too much work needed elsewhere, in a future variation should bombers have more standardized crew position numbering?
For example, if you fly a B-17 one mission and a Ki-67 the next, when the bandits come you'll be scrambling for gunners as follows:
B-17: 2 ball, 3 top, 4 tail, 5 chin, 6 left, 7 right
Ki-67: 2 nose, 3 top, 4 left, 5 right, 6 tail
Fly a Marauder next and your fingers can look for:
B-26: 2 top, 3 tail, 4 nose, 5 left, 6 right
Others (my comments in parentheses) are:
Ju-88: 2 left rear, 3 right rear, 4 ventral
Lanc: 2 nose, 3 top, 4 tail
TBM: 2 turret (say rear), 3 ventral
SBD: 2 turret (say rear, and it's not a turret, is it?)
D3A: 2 turret (say rear, and it's not a turret, is it)
IL-2: 2 tail (say rear)
Boston III: 2 top (say rear)
A-20G: 2 top (say rear)
A top gun can fire in all directions; turret is not helpful since direction (rear), not method, is key; tail gun is in the extreme tail; and (I think) ball turrets are only in the belly of a very few bombers, only the B-17 in Aces High.
An ideal standardized system would apply to all bombers, with the caveat that if a bomber does not have positions numbered to the max 7 (including pilot) on the B-17, they are still numbered in the main order with positions moved up in sequence to avoid key gaps.
As a draft proposal, what do you think about the following bomber gunner position numbering if possible in future Aces High editions:
B-17: 2 tail, 3 top, 4 chin, 5 left, 6 right, 7 ball
B-26: 2 tail, 3 top, 4 nose, 5 left, 6 right (latter two are ventral)
Ki-67: 2 tail, 3 top, 4 nose, 5 left, 6 right
Lanc: 2 tail, 3 top, 4 nose
TBM: 2 rear, 3 ventral
SBD: 2 rear
IL-2: 2 rear
D3A: 2 rear
Boston III: 2 rear
A-20G: 2 rear
Ju-88: 2 left rear, 3 right rear, 4 ventral
Main problem is the B-17 ball turret is its second or third most valuable gun behind the tail gun, but putting it earlier in the B-17 sequence throws the other positions out of the main idea of more standard numbering.
Likewise the B-26 and Ju-88 have unusual top and bottom gun positions which require special designations.
Might make bombing defense a bit more efficient with less fumbling for the gun position needed. Ideas? Alterations? Potential implementation obviously depends on consensus and if and when the most excellent HiTech crew can work it in among more important items.