« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: 3D Mark 2001 SE Results  (Read 627 times)

Offline bloom25

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1675
3D Mark 2001 SE Results
« Reply #15 on: September 25, 2002, 10:54:22 AM »
I've seen that picture before, Tom's Hardware I think. ;)
Logged

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
3D Mark 2001 SE Results
« Reply #16 on: September 25, 2002, 11:03:14 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by bloom25
For reference my Athlon 1900+ system, OC to 1680 MHz (2012+) w/ 143 MHz FSB and an MSI 64 MB GeForce 4 Ti 4200 card (also OC) scores 11399.


:eek: Wow! Well, I'll wait on the video card upgrade, I generally as a rule wait one year min. before upgrading. You save money that way, and it takes that long for software to "catch up" with the hardware technology anway.  For instance, I paid $100 for a Geforce 3 recently, I believe that 16 months ago they were what, $400?
Logged

Offline Kratzer

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2066
      • http://www.luftjagerkorps.com/
3D Mark 2001 SE Results
« Reply #17 on: October 03, 2002, 03:51:26 PM »
Wow... is the GF4 4600 that much better than the GF3 Ti 200?

I have an MSI KT3 Ultra2, AMD Athlon XP 2000+, 256MB PC2100, and a Gainward GF3 Ti200 at 230/500Mhz, and my score is at around 7500.

Is the pickup you got from the GF4 LePaul?  Or does that extra 256MB of RAM make a big difference?  I guess you've also got 128MB of VRAM on there too, and I'm only pushing 64... (only? I remember when a 4MB card was awe inspiring!)
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »