"I do find it interesting that you take a shot at our squad tho"
--Rude
Actually I wasn't taking any sort of shot at your squad; I have never run into your squad and have no idea how you fly. I do, however, assume that in order to like the current map you have to be a certain kind of player--a type of player which your response suggests you've been called before.
"So why not just play Quake? - I'm serious"
--Beet1e
I HAVE played Quake at times, as well as Unreal, UT, NFS4, AW, Warcraft 2, AOK/TC, Doom, Q2, Q3A, CS, XvT, TFC, EQ, and geez I can't even remember the rest. Suffice it to say I've played a LOT of multiplayer games over the years. Right now a game called Dungeon Siege is taking up most of my gaming time--AH is just too dang boring.
I have no interest in re-creating WW2. I like aerial combat--compared to FPS or RTS games, there's quite a bit more variety involved in the action of flightsims like AH, without it being overly time-consuming as the RPG's are. I don't give a rats behind about things like "realism" in gameplay setups. All I want is to find decent, good-sized battles to take part in; I want FUN. It's a game--nothing more. And before you say it, yes I've tried Fighter Ace....it's just too stupid IMO, with its air starts and invisible cockpits. ANY game has to have rules (even Quake has rules).
Seriously, why would ANYONE want to re-create WW2? A typical flight in WW2 involved taking off, flying around for a couple hours and landing, with maybe being in combat for 5 minutes of that--or maybe not. Heck, the ETO P-51 guys were flying 7-hour escort missions and frequently missed combat. That's not exactly what I'd call the height of suspense!
J_A_B