Author Topic: Can we Please have a New Italian Plane? (Read 767 times)

Grif1 · « **Reply #15 on:** July 17, 2002, 02:58:07 PM »

Fighter: G.55 (beautiful bird

)

Bomber
1st choice: Cant Z. 1007 bis "Alcione " (best italian standard WWII bomber)
2nd choice: Piaggio P.108 (too few were built but it was the ultimate "Italian Flying Fortress"

).

stegor · « **Reply #16 on:** July 17, 2002, 03:07:37 PM »

whgate3 wrot

Quote

i guess theres some truth in stereotypes

lol much more easy use stereotypes than switch up your brain ehhhh

Pongo wrot

Quote

Was that SM79 running away from the battle of britain..or towards it?

I heard of canadian humour, is this a typical example??

Oh my God!

Charon · « **Reply #17 on:** July 17, 2002, 03:08:40 PM »

Or maybe, martello, some of us just like to see planes added that actually had some significant degree of impact on the war. The G55 and Re 2005 do not fall into this category. Low production numbers, limited real use and impact.

Quote

The G.55 was considered the best of the Italian DB605-engined fighters, a powerful and robust high-altitude interceptor. Only a few were used in combat, by the fascist Salo-republic after 1943. Production was resumed after after WWII as the G.55A.

or,

Quote

The Re.2005 had similar lines as the earlier Reggiane fighters, but it was longer. It had the best performance of all the Italian DB605-engined fighters, but had structural problems. Series production was only 48, before the Italian surrender of 1943.

The MC 205 squeaks in with a usage figure in the hundreds:

Quote

The best Italian fighters of WWII used German engines. The M.C.205V was a development of the MC.202, powered by the Daimler Benz DB605 instead of the DB601, and armed with 20mm cannon. It was intended as an interim fighter. The M.C.205 was an effective fighter at low and medium altitudes, but only 262 were built. After the war, 42 were delivered to Egypt, and these were used in the war with Israel of 1948-1949.

but pales compared to:

Quote

The M.C.200 originated from the same requirement as the Fiat G.50. It looked similar, had the same virtues and suffered from the same vices: It was a well-designed low-wing monoplane fighter, but underpowered and poorly armed -- the original design was armed with only one 12.7mm gun. Yet the M.C.200 was probably the most used Italian monoplane fighter, and it proved effective against older fighters like the Hurricane. 1153 were built. Breda developed an MC.200bis version powered by a 1180hp Piaggio P.XIX RC45 engine, but this was abandoned in favour of superior types.

Unfortunately, to accurately represent Italian airpower from the era, you're stuck with some decidedly underperforming aircraft. Now if you perked both the G55 or Re 2005, well, I would still push for many other planes first, starting with the the Japanese army late war fighters which did see considerable combat with considerable numbers and would fit well in the MA. Just my opinion.

Charon

brady · « **Reply #18 on:** July 17, 2002, 04:51:30 PM »

A few point's.

The use of Italian Fighters did not end with the Italian surender in 1943, Co belegerant forces in the North and the Germans used Them untill the war ended, most of the Italian aircraft production was in northern Italy.

The SM 79 is not the Italian Bomber we want, the Cant Z. 1007 is by far a better Machine, exceding the SM 79's performance all across the board. The Z. 1007 saw service throught the Italian war.

Production Numbers are not a great way to decide wheather or not a plane should, or should not be included in AH, planes like the G 55, RE 2005 are representave of the Best in Italian engenering and as such are historicaly revelant. Take the case for the C hog only some 200 were built, America built some 100,000 fighters in WW 2, clearly the C hog represent's a very small fraction of the US fighter output, as samll a fraction as the G 55, or Re 2005 would represent of the Italian production....?

The Italians nead somthing that can pack a Bomb, Either a RE 2000 series plane, or a Cant Z.1007( a very capable torpedo plane as well).

One thing I am certain of is that we will get a Japanese plane, a Russian Plane and of COurse anouther US plane, Not to mention the other countries, Heck we may even get a D 520 before we get another Italian plane, I think it is high time we see somthing else for Italy, shurely we have waited long enough.

Pongo · « **Reply #19 on:** July 17, 2002, 05:18:54 PM »

the Italians are picking on me...

gatt · « **Reply #20 on:** July 17, 2002, 05:25:24 PM »

I agree with both Charon and Brady. The C.200 would be a great addition for every North African map and/or scenario. The did well, though armed with only 2x12,7mm, against early Hurricanes and P-40.

In the same time, a G.55 would be a nice 1943 high alt interceptor, in a phase of the war when no 190A5 or 109G-6 (armed with gondolas) could fly or punch better than the italian fighter (with his 3x20mm and 2x12,7mm.

Hehe, Brady ... will our SM79 v/s Cant Z.1007 "war" ever end?

brady · « **Reply #21 on:** July 17, 2002, 06:16:20 PM »

No Gatt, I don't think so:), Nice pick btw. Ya know some more picks of that girl u put up a while ago would help to ease my longing for My Beloved Cant Z. 1007:)

BUG_EAF322 · « **Reply #22 on:** July 17, 2002, 06:21:00 PM »

I..... Have...To ...........Push......a..Dutch ...Fok..ker... G.1

pleaaaaaaaseeee

BUG_EAF322 · « **Reply #23 on:** July 17, 2002, 06:22:58 PM »

AAAAArgh pict.

Pei · « **Reply #24 on:** July 17, 2002, 06:27:33 PM »

G.55 and SM79 please

Raubvogel · « **Reply #25 on:** July 17, 2002, 09:16:37 PM »

G55 would be sweet. Also like to see the P108.

NOD2000 · « **Reply #26 on:** July 17, 2002, 10:34:56 PM »

i have read in many places that the 2005 could out perform anything that the germans had (excluding the jets) and could exeptionally out perform the mustang

Buzzbait · « **Reply #27 on:** July 18, 2002, 01:58:09 AM »

S!

Agree with Brady. Cant Z1007 is the one we want. Can do all kinds of things, drop torpedos, carry decent bombload, reasonably fast, good choice for Italian bomber.

For a fighter, we already have the MC-205 which was their best large scale production fighter, so I say go with the MC-200. It would save some time for the modelers, since the from the cockpit back is essentially the same as 202. This would give us a '40-'41 Italian fighter.

whgates3 · « **Reply #28 on:** July 18, 2002, 03:03:44 AM »

wow - didn't think i would offend so many people - or anyone, as it was unintended (BTW, correct Charon, it was Stanford Tuck & a BR 20, thx). Just thought i was relaying a mildly humourous annecdote. Please excuse my lack of political correctness

Kevin14 · « **Reply #29 on:** July 18, 2002, 09:18:11 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Charon
Or maybe, martello, some of us just like to see planes added that actually had some significant degree of impact on the war. The G55 and Re 2005 do not fall into this category. Low production numbers, limited real use and impact...

Yet we have the Ta152 and the C-Hog?

As I hit my books, the G.55 was developed into three different versions
G.55/I was the standard production model
G.55/II with one built had x5 20mms

G.55S with 10 built could carry a torpedo with reduced armament
and an extended tail wheel leg