Author Topic: Il2 Impressions  (Read 281 times)

Offline udet

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2242
      • http://www.angelfire.com/nd/mihaipruna/dogfight.html
Il2 Impressions
« on: July 22, 2002, 04:33:40 PM »
Finally i got IL2. Not that AH is bad,but I really wanted to strafe troops and see them run around :)
First of all,the graphics are awesome...and that's not so good. My system is nothing to brag about,but right after I got the game I also decided to upgrade my memory(I had 192,IL2 says 256 reccomended) So now I have 256. The problem,before the upgrade, was that the frame rate was getting choppy when there were many airplanes in the sky.-For instance, a mission with 12 vs 12 was almost unplayable. After the memory upgrade-same problem. wtf?!?!?!?! the manual says reccomended system 600MHZ processor and 256 mb of ram-I have a 733MZ Celeron and that amount of RAM-conclusion,my Video Card is to blame.
Still in the graphics department, the instruments are unreadable at 640/480. Switching to 800/600, with the necessary decrease in framerate, the cockpit becomes much more crisp, but I just discovered that,if I switch to a more panoramic view-that is,so i can see all the instruments-they become quite unreadable again.
Therefore,unless I keep panning around the cockpit or I get a huge monitor and play in 1024/768 the nicely rendered detailed cockpit is not very useful
Btw-reading through the IL2 BB-some people play it wih 3d glasses.
As for realism, since I spent most of my time playing with the 109 F, that's the plane I will use for comparison with AH.
1: Engine overheats quicker when using WEP than in AH.
2: Plane is harder to stall but spins are harder to recover from-makes sense cause the 109 had leading edge slats that depolyed automatically to prevent stall.
3:No stall horn,buffet simulated well enough though so you don't find yourself spinning without any warning.
4:Gunnery-I discovered that I suck.Part of it is due to the frame rate.
5:Strafing troops-I couldn't see any from the plane even though ,after I crashed and started looking around from the crash site perspective, they appeared quite nicely,detailed and running around.
Conclusion: With much lower system requirements, AH still not far behind IL2 in graphics and realism.

Offline lord dolf vader

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1528
Il2 Impressions
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2002, 06:38:24 PM »
733 celeron is aproxamatly  same at a p3 500 for power but the buss is still 66 mhz  instead of 100  or 133 big bottle neck time for upgrade . intel screwed ya


Conclusion: With much lower system requirements, AH still not far behind IL2 in graphics and realism.

try it with a full power processor and good vid card ah aint even close.
« Last Edit: July 22, 2002, 06:42:51 PM by lord dolf vader »

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
Il2 Impressions
« Reply #2 on: July 22, 2002, 07:19:21 PM »
Il-2 is a great boxed game.  If they ever get TOD and Spits I'm there.  :)

Offline Staga

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5334
      • http://www.nohomersclub.com/
Il2 Impressions
« Reply #3 on: July 22, 2002, 10:08:49 PM »
Who cares about Spit when you can have a FW-190 with a cockpit like This....

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
Il2 Impressions
« Reply #4 on: July 23, 2002, 02:24:23 AM »
Who cares about cockpits when they DON'T HAVE ANY SPITS ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRGHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!
:D

Offline Staga

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5334
      • http://www.nohomersclub.com/
Il2 Impressions
« Reply #5 on: July 23, 2002, 03:54:12 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by funkedup
Who cares about cockpits when they DON'T HAVE ANY SPITS


Yeah; What a fine game that is :)

Offline Xjazz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
Il2 Impressions
« Reply #6 on: July 23, 2002, 07:54:05 AM »
Spit V to the IL-2!


:D