Author Topic: Senate Passes Gun Liability Bill (Read 642 times)

Ripsnort · « **Reply #15 on:** August 15, 2002, 01:17:15 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Masherbrum
Rip can I get yer email bud, the PM won't work on my end?

Karaya2

I know you were messing with me!
ripsnort60@yahoo.com
We'll talk cars then, seems this board is full of anti-BMW sentiment, lets carry it to email.

Masherbrum · « **Reply #16 on:** August 15, 2002, 01:47:48 PM »

cool is it a 330 though?

Karaya2

Ripsnort · « **Reply #17 on:** August 15, 2002, 01:57:38 PM »

yes. Did you know a 5-series has 82 sq. inches of interior room and the 3-series has 80? Hehe, hardly seems worth it.

Nifty · « **Reply #18 on:** August 15, 2002, 02:34:41 PM »

elitist yuppie wannabes!

Ripsnort · « **Reply #19 on:** August 15, 2002, 02:45:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nifty
elitist yuppie wannabes!

Heh, just a redneck in a yuppie world is more like it...I still love the reactions I get during hunting season when I throw a big elk leg bone out in the front yard and let my lab chew on it...I swear a couple yuppie neighbors probably called 911.

mauser · « **Reply #20 on:** August 15, 2002, 04:40:53 PM »

I hope this bill doesn't see the light of day... hmm, a good place to put it is right up those lawmakers .. nevermind.

A bill like this would probably raise prices, and even further discourage foreign imports. Not good if I ever want to get back into smallbore.

mauser

midnight Target · « **Reply #21 on:** August 15, 2002, 05:35:34 PM »

Well we had a gun manufacturer knowingly creating a knockoff of a banned assault weapon. Then:

He said Navegar made appeals to criminals in the promotion of the TEC-DC9, including advertising it as "fingerprint resistant" and "able to fire without aiming."

So if I were to market a lock pick, saying it could open any lock in the entire city, and some one is robbed using that lock pick. Am I liable?

I think i might be.

Dune · « **Reply #22 on:** August 15, 2002, 05:46:07 PM »

Well, for one thing, you can fire any gun without aiming. You just don't aim and then pull the trigger.

Greese · « **Reply #23 on:** August 15, 2002, 06:38:11 PM »

It is still, last I checked, impossible for a gun to decide to kill someone.

I know many gun folk do not like the idea of trigger locks. I am all for them, I think they would prevent accidents. I am not sure of the arguements against them (haven't heard anything, but again, haven't studied much either).

ra · « **Reply #24 on:** August 15, 2002, 06:54:49 PM »

California lawyers are rejoicing, another industry to sue. If you shoot a lawyer, who gets sued?

Masherbrum · « **Reply #25 on:** August 16, 2002, 05:10:42 AM »

Trigger locks are ok, gun safes are better. When a trigger lock is on your gun and you need it most.......yer dead. Whenever friends or family come over, I place my H&K in my bank-safe. One of my jobs allowed me to take an actual 1/2" thick Diebold bank safe home.

Granted it isn't that fireproof, HOWEVER, take the smallest drill bit that a drill can hold. One hole takes almost 8 hours with a HAMMER DRILL.

Americans need to take RESPONSIBILITY. Trigger locks aren't needed, responsible owners are all that is needed.

Karaya2

lazs2 · « **Reply #26 on:** August 16, 2002, 08:50:54 AM »

for all of yu in california who didn't think that voteing in democrats could hurt things too much....

see?

oh.. for the stupid... you didn't get to smoke pot and you did get more freedom taken away. They didn't "give" you anything but they sure do take.
lazs

Eagler · « **Reply #27 on:** August 16, 2002, 09:07:38 AM »

just think of all the lives this bill will save !

I'm sure the whacked gangbanger will think twice before he pulls the trigger once this is enacted

or is it the gun makers new responsibility to make sure NONE of his product makes its way into the hands of those who will use it illegally - who in their right mind would support such crap besides the lawyers - oops I said right mind - so lawyers do not count .....