"a perk tag is something worth going after even at a disadvantage. "
Why is this a bad thing? I WANT people to do stupid things; it makes them easier to kill. If that 109 or LA7 or Spit or whatever that's under me wants climb up in a vain attempt to hose me from 1.1K only to stall and give me an easy kill, that's fine by me!
Maybe I have a different flying style than you do Innomin8. I almost always fly alone and it doesn't bother me if I have 4 or 5 enemies fixated on me. For ME there is literally no difference between flying an F4U-4 or an unperked plane, except when I was in the F4U-4 I had a much easier time pulling off "close" maneuvers. I don't worry about who the enemy is attacking, only what their position and E-state is relative to me.
The worst thing about the F4U-4 is the poor 6-view which necessitates making gentle turns to check your 6. Otherwise it's like a P-51 on steroids--faster, better climb, better maneuverability, tougher and more bullets. Oh, and it's hard to land because it likes to groundloop
The Perk ICONS are a necessity. Players deserve to know what they're fighting against, especially if they're fighting against something not commonly available and that likely has superior performance. I don't think very many players really want to treat every Spit as if it's a 14, or every Tiffie as if it could be a TEMP. Dealing with the 109's is ebough trouble, and at least they're all free.
Also note that the perk planes with the special tags are those that truly do have some superior performance aspect (the F4U-4 IS superior, perhaps not so dominating as a TEMP but it IS an awesome airplane). The F4U-1C has a perfectly normal tag. If HTC were to add some other perk plane with unspectacular performance, I'd bet you it'd have a normal tag too.
Personally, I think every plane should have a unique ICON, whether at all ranges or at close range only. First of all we can't see as well in AH as you can IRL. Second, not very many Bf-109E's flew frontline combat alongside Bf-109G-10's.
J_A_B