Originally posted by Puck
Here, here!
K/D should be the largest single determining factor, IMHO. That and gunnery are the two things I actually pay attention to.
bah!! k/d weenies... just shows who the vulch/gang/run at the slightest sign of disadvantge weenies are.
k/s, to me, is a better indication... it shows one their relative effectiveness every time they up a plane.
for example someone has a 9:1 k/d but a 1.154:1 k/s that just tells me they're out there but not really engaging... get a kill or so then rtb, or a spurt of vulches and rtb, but then die a few times with nothing to show for it. but in general high k/d are timid flyers.
but... if someone like, say, me

, in tour 31 my k/d is 2.4578 while my k/s is 1.8889 which indicates that i don't survive as often as the 9:1 weenie, but everytime i'm upping i'm getting more than his 1.154 per sortie. i'm much more aggressive.
so i'm inclined to use k/s as a measure, but even then i really measure people by how *i* observe them fly, and i gotta say there's a lotta weenies out there, high "ranked" ones, at that.
to each their own.
k/t just highlights the defensive weenies, and the furball cherrypickers and vulchers.
gunnery is too dependent upon a variety of factors to mean much except for one's own benefit, i.e., the rubber bullets many experience, lag, type of gun used...