It becomes sad when people has to tell their opinion of WWIIOL in unconstructive manner.
What the heck are you talking about? "Uncontructive manner", thats the kind of stuff you say to people who have intrest in whether a game survives. I certainly dont care if wwiiol fails. It wont make 1 bit of difference to me or most here.
There is nothing about wwiiol that is worth preserving at all costs. If it succeeds or fails it will do so on its own.
Now how do I tell you wwiiol is a pos in a constructive manner?
No one in here compared wwiiol to AH but you. We say we dont like wwiiol because of these reasons and you imply we are lying or making stuff up or are to stupid to figure it out. Or we are just biased (still trying to figure out what that means)
Thats been the pattern with the rats, its the pattern of the fan bois.
Because we dont like wwiiol has nothing to do with ah. I myself am a bit burned out with AH but the alternative isnt wwiiol.
Hardcase says that should wwiiol fail then nothing like it will ever happen again. BS, the problem with wwiol isnt the concept, its the creators and the design. Its the lies and shifting of responsibility. On top of all that its not that fun.
Should wwiiol fail theres a good leason there for the next one. Just be 5% better then wwiiol and imagine the fan bois you would have then. You fan bois new it was crap in beta and have been spinning it ever since its release.
Fishu says that he is bored with ah, and no body cares. We say wwiiol is boring and Fishu says we are lying, we dont know how to play, its boring now but will get better etc.....
See the difference fishu? We dont care if you like ah or not.
