Author Topic: Rumsfeld's latest gem...  (Read 605 times)

Offline Dowding (Work)

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 627
Rumsfeld's latest gem...
« on: September 27, 2002, 12:41:51 AM »
"We know Al Queda terrorists went to Baghdad at some point...err...in the past...err... we don't know what for...err... press conference over... can we go to war now?."

Thanks Donald!

Al Queda terrorists went to half the capitals in Europe, not to mention all North Africa. And Saudi Arabia, and Syria and Iran....

Offline Thrawn

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
Rumsfeld's latest gem...
« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2002, 12:49:49 AM »
Whelp, time to invade Europe.

Offline Elfenwolf

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1123
Rumsfeld's latest gem...
« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2002, 01:37:46 AM »
You are all against us. We will make you pay for your insolence. Tomorrow because I'm sleepy now. Goodnight. ZZZZZzzzzz....

Offline Innominate

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2702
Re: Rumsfeld's latest gem...
« Reply #3 on: September 27, 2002, 02:00:05 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Dowding (Work)

Al Queda terrorists went to half the capitals in Europe, not to mention all North Africa. And Saudi Arabia, and Syria and Iran....


But any country who invites them should be bombed.  Also thier neighbors, and any small country that happens to be on the way.

War is good.  Good war footage on CNN beats any of the other crap on TV.  Our army is entirely volunteer, they've volunteered for the danger of a war, nobody is there against thier will.

Plus we REALLY need to justify some of the military's expenditures.  The B-1b and B-2 really need to drop some tonnage.

Lets face it, we love blowing sh*t up.   If we can free a country, or get rich doing it, even better!

Figuring out what bits are jokes and which aren't are left as an exercise to the reader.

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Rumsfeld's latest gem...
« Reply #4 on: September 27, 2002, 08:22:58 AM »
"Stand beside us, or stand aside...."

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10169
Rumsfeld's latest gem...
« Reply #5 on: September 27, 2002, 08:27:41 AM »
Im of the opinion that the entire world should be incinerated crisply and post haste.

Love you all.........
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18867
Rumsfeld's latest gem...
« Reply #6 on: September 27, 2002, 08:47:21 AM »
it's a matter of who you believe and place your trust in ....

imo - we have the best group in the whitehouse today than we've had in the since at least '92

even with this ecomony, 9/11, possiblw war on Iraq -  I sleep better these days knowing the group in charge places the nations best interests and security over their own personal politics and animal urges
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline whgates3

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1426
Rumsfeld's latest gem...
« Reply #7 on: September 27, 2002, 01:38:25 PM »
best gang in the whitehouse since '92 (really i think you meant '93) is not saying much - what was the last time there was a decent group in the whitehouse? '53? IMHO there may have never been a decent bunch in that building.  George Washington was truly a hell of a guy, but he never lived there. the rest have been politicians

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Rumsfeld's latest gem...
« Reply #8 on: September 27, 2002, 01:39:59 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by whgates3
best gang in the whitehouse since '92 (really i think you meant '93) is not saying much - what was the last time there was a decent group in the whitehouse? '53? IMHO there may have never been a decent bunch in that building.  George Washington was truly a hell of a guy, but he never lived there. the rest have been politicians


George Washington owned slaves didn't he?

Offline hardcase

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 719
Rumsfeld's latest gem...
« Reply #9 on: September 27, 2002, 01:46:24 PM »
You do understand many may think that this war talk is designed to cover the economy and the 2002 elections. Sudan, Yeman quite a few others are involved and supporting the BIG AL. Kick them first. Fight the easy guys, let the tough guy simmer. He can only kill other arabs..Saudia Arabia and Iran come to mine. BUT..my god, they have oil. ..You do realize..George W was a hearbeat away from the presidency when Cheny has his attack. You do know it is Daddy G's old cabinet running the country..


and again...It is the economy stupid....

hrdcase

Offline Curval

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11572
      • http://n/a
Rumsfeld's latest gem...
« Reply #10 on: September 27, 2002, 01:47:20 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort


George Washington owned slaves didn't he?



He had a child with one of them didn't he?
Some will fall in love with life and drink it from a fountain that is pouring like an avalanche coming down the mountain

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
Rumsfeld's latest gem...
« Reply #11 on: September 27, 2002, 02:34:16 PM »
Curval
it is rumored Jefferson did after he was widowed , Washington was fathfull to his wife

Offline Thrawn

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
Rumsfeld's latest gem...
« Reply #12 on: September 27, 2002, 07:47:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by john9001
Curval
it is rumored Jefferson did after he was widowed , Washington was fathfull to his wife


How do you know that?

Offline N1kPaz

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 487
who cares....
« Reply #13 on: September 27, 2002, 10:46:16 PM »
you guys need to quit fantasizing about George Washington, and Jeffersons love lives. If you had a slave you would do her too...dont lie about it.

:o

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10169
Rumsfeld's latest gem...
« Reply #14 on: September 27, 2002, 11:03:20 PM »
n1kpaZ,

If I owned a fem slave and she was CUTE I would do her.  Of course, I would never own an ugly slave squeak.  What would be the point in that......

Oh well....its all moot anyway.  I cant afford slaves.
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns