Author Topic: another crooked dem (Read 884 times)

Wotan · « **Reply #15 on:** October 01, 2002, 10:53:57 AM »

Where did I say I read your mind? I did say you are lying about your concern for choice. This is based on your posting history. Those voters in NJ have a choice even with out a democrat on the ticket. They can write in whom ever they want and you know that.

If you dont like it, dont lie.

Kieran · « **Reply #16 on:** October 01, 2002, 10:57:39 AM »

I can't believe anyone is defending going to court to replace the candidate after the deadline. This is wrong on so many levels.

midnight Target · « **Reply #17 on:** October 01, 2002, 11:01:18 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Wotan
Where did I say I read your mind? I did say you are lying about your concern for choice. This is based on your posting history. Those voters in NJ have a choice even with out a democrat on the ticket. They can write in whom ever they want and you know that.

If you dont like it, dont lie.

Oh so, now you can tell I'm lieing based on my posting history? Please break this down for me. I can't wait to see your logical conclusions.

BTW, I wasn't lieing, just so you know.

(funny Eagler, maybe I was decorating it for Wotan

)

midnight Target · « **Reply #18 on:** October 01, 2002, 11:06:30 AM »

Regarding the deadlines. Many of these election regulations are outdated and based upon a time when travel and communication were much more difficult. 5 weeks is sufficient for a run at the Senate. Why not replace the candidate? Other than because we have an arbitrary deadline.

Ripsnort · « **Reply #19 on:** October 01, 2002, 11:10:17 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by midnight Target
Regarding the deadlines. Many of these election regulations are outdated and based upon a time when travel and communication were much more difficult. 5 weeks is sufficient for a run at the Senate. Why not replace the candidate? Other than because we have an arbitrary deadline.

Why not change the voting process when the votes are being counted?

Udie · « **Reply #20 on:** October 01, 2002, 11:13:19 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by midnight Target
Regarding the deadlines. Many of these election regulations are outdated and based upon a time when travel and communication were much more difficult. 5 weeks is sufficient for a run at the Senate. Why not replace the candidate? Other than because we have an arbitrary deadline.

LAW.....

Don't like the deadline, change it before the election. The torch should have known this. He should have quit 2 weeks ago, but he thought he could hide his corruption just a little bit longer.

oops....

1 more republican in the Senate

Udie · « **Reply #21 on:** October 01, 2002, 11:13:51 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Ripsnort

Why not change the voting process when the votes are being counted?

That's SOOO 2000 Rip, that's not trendy anymore. Unless they go retro on us, again.

Wotan · « **Reply #22 on:** October 01, 2002, 11:18:09 AM »

because you are so liberal that you would never support this if it was a republican. Not that I care this is problem for NJ.

That and the fact the voters in NJ have a choice, they can write in whom ever they want. You know this. They have all the "choice" they need.

Quote

funny Eagler, maybe I was decorating it for Wotan

How old are you mt, 50?

midnight Target · « **Reply #23 on:** October 01, 2002, 11:30:33 AM »

So you would be for replacing the Rep. candidate because of your conservative views as posted? Come on. Don't lie!

Idiotic.

I'm old enough to know what I'm dealing with in you Wotan.

Ripsnort · « **Reply #24 on:** October 01, 2002, 11:33:03 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by midnight Target

I'm old enough to know what I'm dealing with in you Wotan.

Big difference between Age and Maturity.

midnight Target · « **Reply #25 on:** October 01, 2002, 11:38:21 AM »

LOL.

So I make a crack about nose picking and I'm immature? hehee!

You guys are a work. IIRC it was a response to an immature remark. I wanted to make sure it was directed at a level they would understand. Go back and look. Maybe remove the blinders. Perhaps the glare from your beemer's paint job, or Wotans jack boots are getting in the way?

Ripsnort · « **Reply #26 on:** October 01, 2002, 11:43:18 AM »

Jack boots? Now resorting to typical Liberal replies...doesn't it ever get old?

(Incidently, forgot a

at the end of my post, even though your views are distorted, and your political thought process warped, I'd still have a beer with ya Tahgut!

)

Wotan · « **Reply #27 on:** October 01, 2002, 11:44:41 AM »

well I am not a conservative. So you really have no idea of

Quote

I'm old enough to know what I'm dealing with in you Wotan

I may not be a leftist liberal but find a post from me that shows I am a conservative.

Basically, you are just lying again. You are just making stuff up.

You are lying about your concern for "choice" and you are quick to pull out the insults. Its typical of you.

Whats idiotic is you trying to pass off your concern for choice. Those voters have a choice. More then just republican and democrat, or liberal and conservative.

Wotan · « **Reply #28 on:** October 01, 2002, 11:46:17 AM »

I wear sandles btw...... Nice quality pair of Jesus Cruisers. It has to do with the heat.

midnight Target · « **Reply #29 on:** October 01, 2002, 12:51:52 PM »

I wasn't thinking 'conservative' at all when I wrote that Wotan.

And Rip, NP bud, I'll even buy.