Author Topic: If we can't have a Heavy German buff...  (Read 308 times)

Offline whgates3

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1426
If we can't have a Heavy German buff...
« Reply #15 on: October 15, 2002, 11:25:06 PM »
Sachs - i wasn't considering anything w/ less than 3 engines as a 'heavy' bomber - for context, i've gotten the idea that twin engine bombers are generally considered 'medium' bombers - the Piaggio P-108 was so similar to the B-17 it would probably be pretty low priority for HTC

Offline Pooh21

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3145
If we can't have a Heavy German buff...
« Reply #16 on: October 16, 2002, 03:53:19 AM »
More Ju-88 versions please!
Bis endlich der Fiend am Boden liegt.
Bis Bishland bis Bishland bis Bishland wird besiegt!

Offline Dowding (Work)

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 627
If we can't have a Heavy German buff...
« Reply #17 on: October 16, 2002, 05:06:02 AM »
Need a Russian bomber first. Tu-2 or Il-4.

A fast twin like he Pe-2 would be a start.

Maybe then the LW could have another bomber.

Offline Imp

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 269
If we can't have a Heavy German buff...
« Reply #18 on: October 16, 2002, 06:18:37 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Dowding (Work)
Need a Russian bomber first. Tu-2 or Il-4.

A fast twin like he Pe-2 would be a start.

Maybe then the LW could have another bomber.


I agree the Pe2 entered service in 1941 I think so it would be a better choice then the Tu2 wich entered service in 1944 I think.

And the Pe2 is urdy too :)

Offline Mathman

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1921
If we can't have a Heavy German buff...
« Reply #19 on: October 16, 2002, 01:49:16 PM »
Where did HTC state that they had no intention of including a heavy bomber for the little goose steppers?  I must have missed it.