Author Topic: war on drugs  (Read 503 times)

Offline mietla

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2276
war on drugs
« Reply #15 on: November 06, 2002, 08:10:52 PM »
someone has to stay outside to deliver drugs

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
war on drugs
« Reply #16 on: November 06, 2002, 08:15:19 PM »
We could have the government do that.
sand

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18786
war on drugs
« Reply #17 on: November 06, 2002, 08:53:59 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by bounder
war on drugs?
might as well have a war on plants. Oh, and fungi. And toads.

we all take drugs. make love not war.

wouldn't mind seeing the link tho Eager


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,69300,00.html
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
war on drugs
« Reply #18 on: November 06, 2002, 09:02:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sandman_SBM
We could have the government do that.


Some say they have previous experience.

Offline AKS\/\/ulfe

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4287
war on drugs
« Reply #19 on: November 06, 2002, 09:04:24 PM »
So... you do NOT wanna get high, Eagler?
-SW

Offline senna

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1318
war on drugs
« Reply #20 on: November 07, 2002, 08:20:05 PM »
>war on drugs? who's winning?

The drug barons are of course. Despite the fact that the good guys are better armed. Americas drug users arent helping the cause either.

Cough, cough, puts on flame vest, jumps off stage.

The house is on fire!!!

:D

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18786
war on drugs
« Reply #21 on: November 07, 2002, 08:36:22 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by senna
>war on drugs? who's winning?

The drug barons are of course. Despite the fact that the good guys are better armed. Americas drug users arent helping the cause either.

Cough, cough, puts on flame vest, jumps off stage.

The house is on fire!!!

:D


a few men in black with remote control airplanes could change all that in a matter of months - if the gov really wanted to. ONCE the link DRUGS=TERRORIST=DRUGS=TERRORIST is firmly established both legally and in the minds of sober America, the door will be wide open for any action.
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline hardcase

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 719
war on drugs
« Reply #22 on: November 07, 2002, 08:40:20 PM »
People who would trade Freedom for Security deserve neither.


Spoken long ago and still cutting edge today.


HC

Offline AKS\/\/ulfe

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4287
war on drugs
« Reply #23 on: November 07, 2002, 08:43:15 PM »
I don't think anyone, sober or not, would go for being spied on Eagler.
-SW

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18786
war on drugs
« Reply #24 on: November 07, 2002, 08:47:16 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by AKS\/\/ulfe
I don't think anyone, sober or not, would go for being spied on Eagler.
-SW


put down da bong, you are gettin paraniod again :)

the ref to the remote planes was in ref to the CIA strike in Yemen.
they would work just as well in Columbia, Mexico & yes your backyard if that is where you have your garden :)

ain't gonna happen though, its the soma for the pppl - keeps the masses sedated & "happy"
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline AKS\/\/ulfe

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4287
war on drugs
« Reply #25 on: November 07, 2002, 08:54:18 PM »
Ah, I thought you meant patrolling the city streets, backyards, peering in your window kinda stuff.
-SW

Offline SC-Sp00k

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 481
war on drugs
« Reply #26 on: November 08, 2002, 06:50:45 AM »
Thats not a bad idea SW.
Whats in your window?

Offline Swoop

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9180
war on drugs
« Reply #27 on: November 08, 2002, 07:05:47 AM »
I'm on the 16th floor, if you can look in my window then you're higher than I am pal......


Offline bounder

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 720
      • http://www.332viking.com
war on drugs
« Reply #28 on: November 08, 2002, 07:58:19 AM »
Oh Eager

Quote
a few men in black with remote control airplanes could change all that in a matter of months


Some would say that happened on 110901, i couldn't possibly comment...

No war on drugs is going to stop people getting high. Ever.

And if we are going to have a war on drugs, how bout bombing all them tobacco producing states huh? No of course it's not gonna happen.

I would have thought that the US (and other enlightened states) would have absorbed the lessons of the Prohibition Era by now but it seems not.

Drugs are a handy enemy that can be whipped out at a moments notice, and coupled with suitable PR campaign, will succeed in stirring up an ignorant public frenzy directed at almost anything you like.

Drugs are also a very good way for the 'intelligence' agencies of the world to ensnare moles, and raise oodles of unofficial income. The end of prohibition would put a stop to that.

Prohibition is pointless, it merely serves to increase the harm to everyone from substances of abuse, whether they abuse them, use them or don't even know they exist.

Criminals find drugs to be a great way of making money too (note, for once I distinguish between 'criminals' and "'intelligence' agencies'. This is because the 'intelligence' agencies are only criminals when they use prohibited drugs to raise invisible revenue)

And that's the extent of your DRUGS=TERRORISTS=DRUGS=TERRORISTS argument (if I can call it that) Eager. Terrorists (and many others) use drugs (in most cases cheap, fast growing crops that can be bought for pittance) to sell at hugely inflated prices to raise revenue for Weapons and Materiel.

Of course, if you could just pop down to the drugstore and pick up some new fast acting psychedelic or stimulant, then it drugs be less of a revenue source for society's ne'er-do-wells. Say about as big a revenue source as the black market in Bisodol.

Heck just think of the extra tax dollars Eli Lilly, Pfizer, GlaxoWellcome and Novartis would contribute if they can sell recreational and therapeutic drugs that were formerly Scheduled. It could all be used in the avacado.

It's a very interesting topic in my opinion, because it revolves around personal freedoms. IMO i am sovereign over my body and no-one else. I should be permitted to ingest what I please.

Drug users take note : It is perfectly possible to get high without contributing money to CIA/Mafia/Al Qaeda. It's simple really, Drugs grow on trees, there's no need to buy them apart from laziness.

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18786
war on drugs
« Reply #29 on: November 08, 2002, 08:11:58 AM »
you don't think this is tied into the dope biz down there?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,69516,00.html

bounder, you are right on one thing, the dopers may want to start growing/cooking their own
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder