"bush gets tangled in his 9/11 lies, part 1
by Jared Israel and Francisco Gil-White, Emperor's New Clothes - September 30, 2002
As you will recall, Bush said he learned of the first World Trade Center crash sitting outside a classroom at the Booker School. He said he saw TV video footage of the plane hitting the building. Of course, this is impossible because, at the time, the TV stations didn't have such footage. Indeed, the TV news people weren't even sure it was a plane crash until the second plane hit the WTC. For example, here is Charles Gibson on ABC news speaking shortly after 9 AM:
"GIBSON: Well, obviously, we don't know if this was--if it was a plane, and I underline, if it was, we don't know if it would have been deliberate or accidental. We know so little now..."
So, Bush definitely did not see TV footage of the crash. However, as you argue, he could have misremembered.
The question is, *did* he? Did he misremember? Or was he lying?
Fortunately we have evidence that can help answer this question.
For the sake of argument, let's suppose Bush did *not* lie. Let's suppose he made false statements at the Florida Town Hall meeting due to faulty memory. Wouldn’t members of his staff have corrected him?
They certainly would. Because his "mistakes" contradicted the previous White House story about what Mr. Bush knew and when on 9-11. That story was outlined at a Press Conference the evening of September 11th by Mr. Bush's press secretary, Ari Fleischer."
This is hot stuff and absolute proof of Bush's evil in weazel's world. Get help weazel....
