My point is that a judge does not determine guilt or innocence - only a jury does.
Some people here in New York do not want to be content with the fact that the verdict was overturned. They treat it as determination of innocence and proof or a crime commited by some other people - and a pretext for a witchhunt.
I would surely want a trial for anyone seving as a policeman and being accused of coercing the admition. I do not want a corrupted police.
Alternatively, if those five were retried now and found guilty again, it would clear the policemen as well.
miko