Author Topic: Operating system question  (Read 1055 times)

Offline bloom25

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1675

Offline mipoikel

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3521
      • http://www.llv32.org
Operating system question
« Reply #16 on: December 30, 2002, 02:09:05 AM »
XP Pro.

I would never go back to 2000, 98, ME etc...
I am a spy!

Offline DR00

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Operating system question
« Reply #17 on: December 30, 2002, 10:35:46 AM »
Go with XP-Pro. It has the advantage of setting any program you want to run under an earlier operating system. If you want AH to run under 2000, you can. Don't like how it operates set it back to XP.
Jack Mehoof.

Offline janneh

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 136
Operating system question
« Reply #18 on: December 30, 2002, 11:40:40 AM »
Get Win XP.
Although I must say that there's nothing wrong in Win 2000 either. Imo Win Xp is Win 2000 Pro with little candy and improved multimedia features (?)

Offline Skuzzy

  • Support Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31462
      • HiTech Creations Home Page
Operating system question
« Reply #19 on: December 30, 2002, 11:56:45 AM »
Folks,..there are substantial differences between XP and 2K.

Enough that there are different versions of DirectX for both.

Oh,..any XP users notice you can no longer get the DirectX install file as a stand alone installation anymore?

You can still get it for 2K.
Roy "Skuzzy" Neese
support@hitechcreations.com

Offline bloom25

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1675
Operating system question
« Reply #20 on: December 30, 2002, 12:57:42 PM »
DROO, Windows 2000 has compatibility mode as well.  Just right click the application executable, pick properites and the last tab to the right is the one you want.

I'm glad those of you who are using Win XP like it.  I personally do not.  It was installed for about a week before I reformatted and went back to Windows 2000 SP 2.  It wasn't any more stable than Win2k.  That was a $100 dollar mistake, but fortunately I just gave that computer away and the XP disk went with it.

There are two main reasons that Windows XP will not touch my computer:

1.  "Automatic Updates"  - This means Microsoft automatically scans and installs "updates" as it feels necessary.  (I'd suggest looking at the "Security Digital Content" rights management portion of the EULA, which says Microsoft may lock down certain media files and content without user approval.)  In my line of work I sometimes do programming work and it is ABSOLUTELY vital no software is installed or running when I'm trying to debug a program I've written.  I do not want my OS changing key system files automatically.

2.  Windows XP has the ability to deactivate itself when hardware changes are made.  After a certain date (July 31 2004, if I remember right) reactivation may not be free.  Even when it is "free" it means calling Microsoft and waiting on hold for about 15 minutes or going online (if you have an internet connection - my debugging machine does not).  I change hardware all the time, Windows XP would be a nightmare for me.

Some other reasons I don't like Windows XP:  The OS is constantly sending traffic to Microsoft when you are online (chewing up valuable bandwidth for people who do not have broadband access where they live yet).  I personally like to be in control of my computer and don't like Microsoft having administrator rights to my computer to access and change files when they see fit.  (I can see that the license key of Microsoft software installed on the computer is sent to Microsoft whenever an "update" is downloaded... :( )  Regardless of the fact that they may have a legal right to do that, it just feels like the police searching your computer every day to make sure you aren't doing something you shouldn't.

Offline mrsid2

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1081
Operating system question
« Reply #21 on: December 30, 2002, 01:19:54 PM »
Well said Bloom..

I'd also like to add that porn looks way better on W2k than on XP.
That alone is good enough reason to get it.

Offline Tarmac

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3988
Operating system question
« Reply #22 on: December 30, 2002, 05:39:53 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Skuzzy
Folks,..there are substantial differences between XP and 2K.

Enough that there are different versions of DirectX for both.

Oh,..any XP users notice you can no longer get the DirectX install file as a stand alone installation anymore?

You can still get it for 2K.


I don't get it... what's the significance of not being able to get a stand-alone directX install file?  

You mean you have to go to windows update and have your computer searched?  Or is there more bad news too?

Offline AKDejaVu

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5049
      • http://www.dbstaines.com
Operating system question
« Reply #23 on: December 30, 2002, 10:24:24 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by bloom25
WinXP has built in .zip file support and a very basic firewall that Windows 2000 does not have.
Please explain this.  I'm running Win2k Advanced Server and see the same basic firewall setup there, though some settings are not quite as obvious.  There is port blocking and forwarding capabilities.
Quote
 The default WinXP gui is also different.  (I personally do not like it.)
I didn't like it at first either.  I thought it felt slimey.  Though, I did find that as I switched back and forth I began to like XP's GUI better than the 2k/Win98 GUI.

AKDejaVu

Offline Ike 2K#

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
Operating system question
« Reply #24 on: December 31, 2002, 05:44:24 AM »
For those people who run MadOnion's 3D MARK 2001 (a program that test your v-card to the limits) Stay on Win-98. Most testers found that their benchmark number is bigger in Win98 than the newer windows OSs.

If you want your win98 or ME to run faster or not to crash anymore, download "Anti Crash" and "Hare" by dachshund software.

Offline BenDover

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5803
Operating system question
« Reply #25 on: December 31, 2002, 01:08:46 PM »
Well i've had to go with 2000, XP disk is FUBAR, and ME has started its monthly period of throwing errors in my face

Besides it being a squeak to install my modem, everything seems to be running fine

EXCEPT!  aces high, i keep getting loads of spiky graphics, like this

Offline BenDover

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5803
Operating system question
« Reply #26 on: December 31, 2002, 01:13:29 PM »
FYI, its been rumored that Micro$uck is trying to phase out win 98

Offline mipoikel

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3521
      • http://www.llv32.org
Operating system question
« Reply #27 on: January 01, 2003, 03:28:06 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by BenDover
Well i've had to go with 2000, XP disk is FUBAR, and ME has started its monthly period of throwing errors in my face

Besides it being a squeak to install my modem, everything seems to be running fine

EXCEPT!  aces high, i keep getting loads of spiky graphics, like this


No no no... it seems that HTC has modeled northern lights also. :D
I am a spy!

Offline Vulcan

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9891
Operating system question
« Reply #28 on: January 01, 2003, 05:12:52 AM »
Hey bloom, rtfm on XP, all the stuff u squeaked about can be turned off really easy.

I have XP on gaming system, love it, its dead stable. 2k is on my server.

Offline Tyro48

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 261
Operating system question
« Reply #29 on: January 01, 2003, 05:18:58 AM »
BenDover load SP3 for Win2K and your probs with vid card should clear up.