Author Topic: Did any AW's got to Warbirds? (Read 563 times)

Seeker · « **Reply #15 on:** November 13, 2001, 09:00:00 PM »

I know of no AW's personaly who switched to WB. 90% of the guys I know ended up here, 5% went to WWIIOL, and 5% just quit.

Checksix · « **Reply #16 on:** November 14, 2001, 07:38:00 AM »

wb3 isnt free... its 10 bucks month

apples to apples comparison

wb3 = 10 bucks a month.
ah = 15 bucks a month

old wb isnt worth extra full service plan of payin anither 15 bucks month.

everything on net will be at 10 bucks sooner or later but ah is still better even bein more expensive

AKDejaVu · « **Reply #17 on:** November 14, 2001, 07:41:00 AM »

Not really checksix... Its a nitpick... but WBs 3 is free with any IEN account.... while in beta. It will cost more soon.

AKDejaVu

lazs1 · « **Reply #18 on:** November 14, 2001, 08:07:00 AM »

been lurking a little on AGW.. seems that they have a bunch of arenas but... they insist on the silly and boring "axis vs Allied" thing.. they are complaining mightily about lack of numbers in the arenas. Seems all of the FR arenas combined have about half the numbers we are experiancing lately. They are trying to "force" the RR guys into the "real" arenas but not having much luck.

Allied vs axis and RPS in WB has created one huge arena tho... It is called Aces High.
lazs

Daff · « **Reply #19 on:** November 14, 2001, 09:05:00 AM »

"Allied vs axis and RPS in WB has created one huge arena tho... It is called Aces High."

Actually...if they hadnt created Axis vs Allied, I would have quit WB then and gone completly to AH

Daff

lazs1 · « **Reply #20 on:** November 14, 2001, 02:46:00 PM »

actually daff... I would wish that anyone including yourself that likes the one dimensional, simplistic "axis vs allied" stay in WB. I think that WB is a good place for the enemies of fun to be. It is difficult enough to battle them here without them getting re-enforcements.

maybe you would get those numbers up if you changed the icon settings? No? try a few more leathiality changes?
lazs

Ratbo · « **Reply #21 on:** November 14, 2001, 02:53:00 PM »

Hell no - It's RARE I can re-use a good bit.
Cold will be best....

-W

Quote

Originally posted by texter:

time to post the picture and show what's what.

Tex
shall I, maestro?

Ratbo · « **Reply #22 on:** November 14, 2001, 02:56:00 PM »

I said *our* sheep. As in yours and mine - not WB's. We'll see who has more sheep when the CON rolls around though...

Mbaaaa!

-W

Quote

Originally posted by Exile:
[QB]

"your" sheep?? Hey!! Get your hands off Fluffy!!

narsus · « **Reply #23 on:** November 14, 2001, 03:10:00 PM »

actually i have seen a large influx of new players in WB lately. Could be AWers or not don't really care, just as long as there is new vict... um players I am ok with that. As far as axis vs. allies IMO these days thats what it should be anyway and early war rides never hurt. AH is good and so is WB as far as the mushy feeling in WB that has much much more to do with stick settings than actual FM i find. Once I adjusted it felt much crisper.

Narsus