Author Topic: California loses track of 33,000 sex offenders  (Read 289 times)

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8801
California loses track of 33,000 sex offenders
« on: January 10, 2003, 10:34:19 AM »
How they managed to do this is what officials are pondering right now.

However, I believe I know what happened.

The Arch Diocese switched to an unlisted number.
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline WineMan

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 88
California loses track of 33,000 sex offenders
« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2003, 10:35:50 AM »
Amen.

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
<My theory
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2003, 10:40:33 AM »
They got lost cause Gray Davis did not want anyone to know about his past!:D

Offline ra

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3569
California loses track of 33,000 sex offenders
« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2003, 11:09:00 AM »
Maybe it's safe for me to move back to California...

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18778
California loses track of 33,000 sex offenders
« Reply #4 on: January 10, 2003, 12:02:02 PM »
never fear, they'll pop back up :(
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
California loses track of 33,000 sex offenders
« Reply #5 on: January 10, 2003, 12:05:02 PM »
I have a friend who thinks this law is unfair!

That it ruins the lives of these poor men.

I say GOOD!

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
California loses track of 33,000 sex offenders
« Reply #6 on: January 10, 2003, 12:19:25 PM »
Washington State lost track of 10% of theirs...gee, what do these two states have in common politically?  I'll let Eagler answer that one ;)

Quote
SAN JOSE, CALIF. -- California has lost track of more than 33,000
                 convicted sex offenders, despite a law requiring rapists and child molesters to
                 register each year for inclusion in the Megan's Law database.

                 "We don't know where they are," acknowledged Margaret Moore, who until
                 recently ran California's sex offender registry.

                 Sex offenders are not checking in with law enforcement, which in most cases is
                 a felony. And many overworked police departments are not following up.

                 Experts say sex offender databases nationwide have fallen short of their
                 promise.

                 "It's not only in California," said Laura Ahearn, executive director of Parents for
                 Megan's Law, a national victims' rights group. "We're expecting sex offenders
                 to be reporting their addresses and that's the problem."

                 According to 2002 data provided to the Associated Press after repeated
                 requests over nine months, the state does not know the whereabouts of at least
                 33,296 sex offenders, or 44 percent of the 76,350 who registered with the state
                 at least once. These rapists and child molesters vanished after registering.

                 The total number of convicted sex offenders whose whereabouts are unknown
                 may be even higher: No one knows how many offenders never registered at all
                 after leaving prison.

                 Failing to register could put high-risk offenders in jail for as many as three more
                 years, but most police departments are not enforcing the law.

                 No one knows how many of these missing sex offenders have struck again. But
                 nationally, 52 percent of rapists are arrested for new crimes within three years
                 of leaving prison, according to the U.S. Justice Department.

                 The 1996 law is named for 7-year-old Megan Kanka, a New Jersey girl who
                 was raped and killed by a child molester who had moved in across the street.
                 All states have similar laws designed to warn communities about the presence
                 of such ex-cons.

                 Megan's Law databases are supposed to help the public and police monitor
                 convicted sex offenders by keeping track of their home and work addresses
                 and other personal details. Adults can search the database at sheriffs' offices or
                 police departments.

                 But no one audits California's database for accuracy. State Justice Department
                 officials cannot even say how much the program costs.

                 Attorney General Bill Lockyer touts the sex offender database as a valuable
                 tool for the public. But when presented with the AP's findings he acknowledged
                 changes are needed.

                 "Our system is inadequate, woefully inadequate," he said. "It can only be
                 improved by putting money into the local law enforcement agencies. It's a
                 matter of resources."

                 Some states take a firmer approach. In Washington, law enforcement officers
                 go to sex offenders each year to confirm their information, rather than relying
                 on ex-cons to report in. Ten percent of that state's 17,105 offenders could not
                 be found, said Toni Korneder, Washington's Criminal History Records manager

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
Was kinda hoping
« Reply #7 on: January 10, 2003, 02:20:00 PM »
Some of the Libs here would come and say how this law sucks....

WHere is MT when you need him?

Offline H. Godwineson

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 551
California loses track of 33,000 sex offenders
« Reply #8 on: January 10, 2003, 02:49:25 PM »
A permanent address at the bottom of San Francisco Bay would solve that problem.  Or is that too drastic.

Shuckins