I'm pretty sure it has been answered before in another thread, but I'm too lazy to do a search.
This has been in my head since the trouble started.
If in '91 troops were surrendering by the thousands in Iraq, its military equipment had been all but destroyed, and the kurds wanted some Hussein blood...
Why wasn't Saddam overthrown, killed, or judged like Milosevic?
Why leave him in power when it was clear he was dangerous?
Please bear in mind that my questions are not rethoric, I do want to know, so keep the flame-level to a minimum.
Thank you.
Daniel