Oh.. almost forgot.. US didn't care much for Adolf, until their interests got hit.
Neither were they interested to escort british supply convoys to UK, even within their own sea borders, other than saving the sailors of torpedoed merchant ships.
so.. why should the french bother to do something for Bush's crusade, until their own arse gets on the fire?
Would they also have then half a century later a right to require US's cooperation in their whatever crusades?
Blame the french all you want, but most of the europe seems to be thinking that the US's crusade against Iraq is hurried up with rather weak reasons and theres no reason for them to bother with it yet.
US always has reasons for wars, just never those which are officially claimed to be the reasons.
Toad,
I don't quite see a war on terrorism in Iraq.
They might claim so.. but I'd say "what war on terrorism?"
and sure they might have their osama and terrorist hunts going on, but what Bush says, counts here...
But Bush has already said the priority is elsewhere....
So go figure.