Author Topic: A Flame Free Discussion on France  (Read 2198 times)

Offline Habu

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1905
A Flame Free Discussion on France
« Reply #90 on: February 13, 2003, 11:04:59 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hades55
==Although France complied with the NATO/ Common Market weapons embargo, the French technical team remained in Argentina and apparently continued to work on the aircraft and Exocets, successfully repairing the malfunctioning launch systems. Without the technical help and collusion from the government of France—Britain’s NATO “ally”—it is improbable that Argentina would have been able to employ its most devastating weapon. 18==

The technicians who helped Argeninians to make Exosets work
was not french. They was Israelis. For Big money.
I wonder, where all of you learn history or news.
And something more, when France was selling S Etedarts and exosets to argentina was not knowing what will happen. [/B]


Well it was posted where I got my information. Perhaps you could post where you got yours from?

Offline Habu

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1905
A Flame Free Discussion on France
« Reply #91 on: February 13, 2003, 11:25:21 AM »
 :(

Offline StSanta

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2496
A Flame Free Discussion on France
« Reply #92 on: February 13, 2003, 01:00:48 PM »
Give the US military to Denmark.

With limited resources, we did wonders back in the Viking era. There are even French prayers saying 'oh save us from the wrath of the Northmen'.

Yanks; lend us a carrier. Let us put our shields on its side and give us a month; the French shall annoy you no more :D.

Sorry Straffo. Hell, we might even be related - my great great great great great great great great great great great great grandfather may have raped your great great great great great great great great great great great great grandmother.

Did I say raped? I meant 'involuntary consentual intercourse'.

I speek PC goodt.

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
A Flame Free Discussion on France
« Reply #93 on: February 13, 2003, 01:20:03 PM »
I vote AYE!!

Santa.. nothin woulld warm my cockles more than to see our mothballed ships and hardware placed into the hands of folks like yours. Remember the Free Poles ala WWII?
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
A Flame Free Discussion on France
« Reply #94 on: February 13, 2003, 01:24:03 PM »
French military history
>
>
>> The Complete Military History of France: Not going to
>> play? Who Gives a Rat's Ass?
>>
>> * Gallic Wars - Lost. In a war whose ending
>> foreshadows the next 2000 years of French history,
>> France is conquered by of all things, an Italian.
>>
>> * Hundred Years War - Mostly lost, saved at last by
>> female schizophrenic who inadvertently creates The
>> First Rule of French Warfare; "France's armies are
>> victorious only when not led by a Frenchman."
>>
>> * Italian Wars - Lost. France becomes the first and
>> only country to ever lose two wars when fighting
>> Italians.
>>
>> * Wars of Religion - France goes 0-5-4 against the
>> Huguenots
>>
>> * Thirty Years War - France is technically not a
>> participant, but manages to get invaded anyway. Claims
>> a tie on the basis that eventually the other
>> participants started ignoring her.
>>
>> * War of Devolution - Tied. Frenchmen take to wearing
>> red flowerpots as chapeaux.
>>
>> * The Dutch War - Tied
>>
>> * War of the Augsburg League/King William's War/French
>> and Indian War -- Lost, but claimed as a tie. Three
>> ties in a row induces deluded Frogophiles the world
>> over to label the period as the height of French
>> military power.
>>
>> * War of the Spanish Succession - Lost. The War also
>> gave the French their first taste of a Marlborough,
>> which they have loved every since.
>>
>> * American Revolution - In a move that will become
>> quite familiar to future Americans, France claims a
>> win even though the English colonists saw far more
>> action. This is later known as "de Gaulle Syndrome",
>> and leads to the Second Rule of French Warfare; "
>> France only wins when America does most of the
>> fighting."
>>
>> * French Revolution - Won, primarily due the fact that
>> the opponent was also French.
>>
>> * The Napoleonic Wars - Lost. Temporary victories
>> (remember the First Rule!) due to leadership of a
>> Corsican, who ended up being no match for a British
>> footwear designer.
>>
>> * The Franco-Prussian War - Lost. Germany first plays
>> the role of drunk Frat boy to France's ugly girl home
>> alone on a Saturday night.
>>
>> * World War I - Tied and on the way to losing, France
>> is saved by the United States. Thousands of French
>> women find out what it's like to not only sleep with a
>> winner, but one who doesn't call her "Fraulein."
>> Sadly, Widespread use of condoms by American forces
>> forestalls any improvement in the French bloodline.
>>
>> * World War II - Lost. Conquered French liberated by
>> the United States and Britain just as they finish
>> learning the Horst Wessel Song.
>>
>> * War in Indochina - Lost. French forces plead
>> sickness, take to bed with the Dien Bien Flu.
>>
>> * Algerian Rebellion - Lost. Loss marks the first
>> defeat of a western army by a Non-Turkic Muslim force
>> since the Crusades, and produces the First Rule of
>> Muslim Warfare; "We can always beat the French." This
>> rule is identical to the First Rules of the Italians,
>> Russians, Germans, English, Dutch, Spanish, Vietnamese
>> and Esquimaux.
>>
>> * War on Terrorism - France, keeping in mind its
>> recent history, surrenders to Germans and Muslims just
>> to be safe. Attempts to surrender to Vietnamese
>> ambassador fail after he takes refuge in a McDonald's.
>>
>> The question for any country silly enough to count on
>> the French should not be "Can we count on the
>> French?", but rather "How long until France
>> collapses?"

Offline Dowding

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6867
      • http://www.psys07629.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/272/index.html
A Flame Free Discussion on France
« Reply #95 on: February 13, 2003, 01:26:27 PM »
Already posted Ripsnort.

It was HILARIOUS!
War! Never been so much fun. War! Never been so much fun! Go to your brother, Kill him with your gun, Leave him lying in his uniform, Dying in the sun.

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
A Flame Free Discussion on France
« Reply #96 on: February 13, 2003, 01:50:24 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Dowding
Already posted Ripsnort.

It was HILARIOUS!


Dang, someone beat me to it! (Dear Diary...):D

Offline blitz

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1007
A Flame Free Discussion on France
« Reply #97 on: February 13, 2003, 02:02:34 PM »
Ahoi:)

The reasons for attackin Iraq that bush administration is givin us i are just plain rediculous. The USA isn't threathened by iraq in any way.

The world cannot devided into  'The evil and the good' and
'Who's not with us are against us' That's roadkill. World is a little bit more complicated.

USA, as the last remaining Super Power cannot play the 'worlds police man'.  In fact, no single country can do so because there always  own country interests involved which might be very different from many other countries interests.

What we see now is a very short eyed and bad politic by Bush gouvernment.

They try to manipulate  the UN and the nato for their very own interests.

The moment US stated that they will attack iraq with or without the United Nations the whole thing has gone down the tube.

What has to be done is to strenghen the UN on long terms.

Veto rights for the winners of WW2 has to be fall.

Hats off to France , Belgium and Germany for a little resistance.



Talkin about turkey? They torture people on a regular base in their police stations. Iraq killed 5000 kurds? Ask turkey how many they killed the last 10 years.Definately way more than that. These peeps should be kicked out of nato asap.

Regards Blitz

btw. Was to go on a 2 day holyday tommorrow evin. Cancelled it to join Anti iraq war demonstration in Berlin on sat 12:00.
Hope we're at least a few thousand to get our bellybutton frozen  :D
« Last Edit: February 13, 2003, 02:15:28 PM by blitz »

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
A Flame Free Discussion on France
« Reply #98 on: February 13, 2003, 02:07:39 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by blitz
Ahoi:)

The reasons for attackin Iraq that bush administration is givin us i are just plain rediculous. The USA isn't threathened by iraq in any way.

The world cannot devided into  'The evil and the good' and
'Who's not with us are against us' That's roadkill. World is a little bit more complicated.

USA, as the last remaining Super Power cannot play the 'worlds police man'.  In fact, no single country can do so because there're always have  own country interests involved which might be very different from many other countries interests.

What we see now is a very short eyed and bad politic by Bush gouvernment.

They try to manipulate  the UN and the nato for their very own interests.

The moment US stated that they will attack iraq with or without the United Nations the whole thing has gone down the tube.

What has to be done is to strenghen the UN on long terms.

Veto rights for the winners of WW2 has to be fall.

Hats off to France , Belgium and Germany for a little resistance.



Talkin about turkey? They torture people on a regular base in their police stations. Iraq kiiled 5000 kurds? Ask turkey how many they killed the last 10 years. These peeps should be kicked out of nato asap.

Regards Blitz

btw. Was to go on a 2 day holyday tommorrow evin. Cancelled it to join Anti iraq war demonstration in Berlin on sat 12:00.
Hope we're at least a few thousand to get our bellybutton frozen  :D


Why do you think we're going to war Blitz?

Offline blitz

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1007
A Flame Free Discussion on France
« Reply #99 on: February 13, 2003, 02:11:15 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
Why do you think we're going to war Blitz?

You evil, don't ya make jokes on me ;D

Regards Blitz

Offline ra

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3569
A Flame Free Discussion on France
« Reply #100 on: February 13, 2003, 02:15:23 PM »
If we aren't careful this thread will go to 3 pages.

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
A Flame Free Discussion on France
« Reply #101 on: February 13, 2003, 02:23:53 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Habu
Well it was posted where I got my information. Perhaps you could post where you got yours from?


why should he bother ?
your only reference was flawed


I'll even give a hint : apparently

@ra : I'll do my best :D

Offline Habu

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1905
A Flame Free Discussion on France
« Reply #102 on: February 13, 2003, 02:27:27 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by straffo
why should he bother ?
your only reference was flawed


I'll even give a hint : apparently

@ra : I'll do my best :D


Apparently you do not speak English very well or you would understand the reason for using that word in that particular sentence. And it has nothing to do with your claim of innocence.

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
A Flame Free Discussion on France
« Reply #103 on: February 13, 2003, 02:36:55 PM »
So I'll give you an usage of apparently :

http://www.skeptic.com/01.2.harris-dead.html

THE SOCIETY FOR THE RECOVERY OF PERSONS APPARENTLY DEAD

Offline Habu

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1905
A Flame Free Discussion on France
« Reply #104 on: February 13, 2003, 02:45:22 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by straffo
So I'll give you an usage of apparently :

http://www.skeptic.com/01.2.harris-dead.html

THE SOCIETY FOR THE RECOVERY OF PERSONS APPARENTLY DEAD


See that is the problem when you are not a native English speaker. You do not understand how the type of document you are reading and its language are very much related.

It is not your fault, but a french or german person who learns English will never have the understanding necessary not to come off as a fool occasionally.