Author Topic: AH FM flaw or miss-conception?  (Read 4965 times)

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
AH FM flaw or miss-conception?
« Reply #30 on: February 17, 2003, 12:03:05 AM »
I knew squat about planes before AH.
Thanks for the explanation HT.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
AH FM flaw or miss-conception?
« Reply #31 on: February 17, 2003, 01:23:04 AM »
But hitech why do AH planes keep falling nose up?

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
AH FM flaw or miss-conception?
« Reply #32 on: February 17, 2003, 01:41:34 AM »
because there's no lift to keep it flat once horstab is off?
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline moose

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2702
      • http://www.ccrhl.com
AH FM flaw or miss-conception?
« Reply #33 on: February 17, 2003, 06:41:53 AM »
i thought i had a pretty good understanding of this stuff

but now i'm more confused then ever

and frenchy - i have that book :)
<----ASSASSINS---->

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
AH FM flaw or miss-conception?
« Reply #34 on: February 17, 2003, 07:00:51 AM »
Is there a point on using CPU power to compute the FM of a wreck ?

Is AH still doing any computation on such a "part-less" plane or does the  AH's engine just discard it  ?

Offline Tilt

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
      • FullTilt
AH FM flaw or miss-conception?
« Reply #35 on: February 17, 2003, 08:19:26 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
But hitech why do AH planes keep falling nose up?


because as the nose comes down the wing begins to generate lift?          so depending on the new cg the AC either cartwheels with an upward nose moment or "nods" down with the nose mostly up? (assuming wings are in perfect working order)
Ludere Vincere

Offline Badboy

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1226
AH FM flaw or miss-conception?
« Reply #36 on: February 17, 2003, 01:39:06 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Seeker
I've a clip of a Blenheim lose it's tail after a collision at an air show: It goes straight up, then sinks nose high into the ground, along with (presumably) with four men screaming their last. Why didn't it plough nose first into the ground? That's what I'm trying to understand.

<edit >

I've just checked the clip again, It's Beauforts, an MPEG of 2,355 Mb if any one wants it, and it looks exactly  like AH.



Hi Seeker,

Can you email me a copy of that MPEG please?

Also, the behaviour you are asking about, appears to be perfectly correct to me, and is exactly what I would expect from the excellent flight model in AcesHigh. I think the confusion in this discussion has been caused by some misunderstanding of the system of forces shown in the stability diagram, and in trying to apply that to explain what happens when the tail has gone away.

Just bear with me while I build an image of what happens… There you are flying along, minding your own business, in level flight at constant speed. At this point the stability diagram shown in this thread is doing us proud! All the forces on your aircraft are balanced. The prop’ thrust is balanced with drag, the lift with weight and so on. All the moments are balanced too, the pitching yawing and rolling moments are all in equilibrium. The nose down pitching moment caused by the weight and lift couple is balanced at the tail, and so on.

Now, since the question only concerns what direction the nose points when the tail goes away, let’s just think about those pitching moments. Most folk think like this… During flight the weight and lift couple was trying to rotate the nose downwards, and the tail was preventing this from happening. So, if we remove the tail, there will be nothing to prevent that rotation, and the nose will drop… Not so fast! That’s not what happens, you might not see this right away, so bear with me, I’m going to go slowly… But first, the flaw in that reasoning is that it overlooks the fact that the nose down pitching moment that existed during controlled flight, also goes away with the tail. You see, the tail wasn’t only responsible for the balancing moment, it was also indirectly responsible for the lift that was produced the nose down pitching moment in the first place. Once the tail has gone, that stability diagram no longer applies… So what does happen?

Firstly, the wings are only producing lift when they are forced to do so by the control surfaces at the tail. Those surfaces (using a small force but long lever arm) rotate the wings against the airflow, forcing the wings to fly at an angle to the free air stream, thereby causing downwash, and thus lift. When the elevators go away with the tail, the wings will begin to move upwards, due to the lift already there, but they won’t go far because as they move the lift decays rapidly until the wings weather vane, and no longer produce any lift. That all happens in just a few degrees, so when the tail goes away, the nose might move down slightly, but only momentarily, because now that only leaves an engine, with the wings and forward/mid fuselage acting as little more than dead weight that simply wants to fall downwards, with a propeller attached to it that is still producing thrust.

Now, all you really need to consider at this point is how a heavy lump of metal with a propeller attached to it would fall. I think most people can see intuitively, that the heavy lump would fall first, dragging the propeller behind it. An admittedly weak analogy would be the stable condition that arises with a man hanging beneath a parachute. The aircraft falls, dragging the prop behind it, and falls more slowly because the prop is producing thrust and slowing it down.

That's exactly what happens in AcesHigh... Kudos HT!

Hope that helps.

Badboy
The Damned (est. 1988)
  • AH Training Corps - Retired
  • Air Warrior Trainer - Retired

Offline CMC Airboss

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 705
      • http://www.cutthroats.com
AH FM flaw or miss-conception?
« Reply #37 on: February 17, 2003, 01:51:22 PM »
There is a really easy way to see what happens when the horizontal stabilizor is removed from an airplane in flight - purchase a balsa wood glider and become a flight test engineer :D

MiG

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12425
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
AH FM flaw or miss-conception?
« Reply #38 on: February 17, 2003, 02:13:59 PM »
funked's diagram is exactly the way ah is set up for most planes.


HiTech

Offline CMC Airboss

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 705
      • http://www.cutthroats.com
AH FM flaw or miss-conception?
« Reply #39 on: February 17, 2003, 02:27:06 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by funkedup
Frenchy I think this is what Hitech meant when he made the reference to your diagram.

a.c. = aerodynamic center

As long as the c.g. is forward of the airplane's a.c., the airplane is longitudinally stable.

Stretching back to my aerodynamics courses in college - Lifting bodies use the of concept of aerodynamic center in lieu of a conventional aircraft's center of pressure.  It also works for aircraft that are longitudinally unstable, like the F-16.  None of the aircraft in AH should be modeled with the horizontal stabilizer providing lift in stabilized straight and level flight.  The aircraft's total CP has to be in front of the CG in an aircraft with a conventional tail to be capable of longitudinally stable flight.

Anyone that doubts that the horizontal tail's "lifting" force acts downward needs to go out and fly a C-182.   (Remember, the elevator goes up to force the tail down.)  You'll get a real appreciation for just how much downward force is required when you flare for landing.  The yoke is at its aft limit of travel at touchdown.

MiG

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
AH FM flaw or miss-conception?
« Reply #40 on: February 17, 2003, 02:36:49 PM »
* Layman's questions! :) *

 That's a very good explanation Badboy! I think I can at least vaguely get a picture of what you are talking about..

 But I'm still a bit confused.

 First, umm.. can it not be considered that the case you explained is sort of like a 'purely theoretical' one? I mean, if you say it happens that way, no doubt you're right then. :)

 What I mean is, in the case you describe, wouldn't it be a case when a plane is flying around, and then suddenly the H-stabs just disappears into thin air? How would it compare to real life, when an attacking plane shoots from behind, and gradually the H-stab is tattered, pieces disappearing, falling off, and then finally breaking off? Would it be the same in behavior, as like in AH the H-stabs and all its forces gets removed in an instant?

 .. and ummm.. as I've said, I've not seen too many clips and footages, but I've still seen quote some cases where the tail end gets very badly damaged on the target plane. Seeker says his footage is like in AH, but I've never seen such thing happen.

 Would this "nose up, tail down, fall vertical like a helicopter" sort of behavior be a rare case in real life? :confused: Or was it the general case of planes with their aft sections badly damaged? Also, what would be the difference in behavior between a 'badly damaged' aft section and the aft section/tail/stabilizers being totally removed?
 
 .. and third question.. as in some cases I've seen, when the stabilizers and tails get battered into rags, and the plane begins to dive and auger, what kind of damage would cause this behavior? Or, is that kind of behavior due to the pilot bailing out and giving up control of the plane, not relevant with the forces working on the plane?? :confused:

Offline udet

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2242
      • http://www.angelfire.com/nd/mihaipruna/dogfight.html
AH FM flaw or miss-conception?
« Reply #41 on: February 17, 2003, 03:16:28 PM »
Frenchy, there CG is supposed to be ahead of the Aerodynamic Center of the aircraft(the point around which the moments caused by lift stay constant even when the AOA is changing) for the machine to be stable.
The aerodynamic center is calculated taking into account the effects of the tail as well. Also, the aerodynamic center is not the same point as the center of lift of the wing. Depending on loading and flying conditions, the CG and the center of lift move around (for instance if flaps are lowered or not), the tail is used to create a moment either downward or upward.
Therefore, I think it is possible for planes to go up when they lose their tail. Not all of them and not always, but SOME would certainly exhibit this tendency.

Offline udet

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2242
      • http://www.angelfire.com/nd/mihaipruna/dogfight.html
AH FM flaw or miss-conception?
« Reply #42 on: February 17, 2003, 03:18:24 PM »
hmm...I guess funkedup's picture explains it better :)

Offline Seeker

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
AH FM flaw or miss-conception?
« Reply #43 on: February 17, 2003, 03:23:36 PM »
Perfect, Badboy,

I think I'm getting it now :-)

The film clip's on it's way to your blue yonder address.

I *think* it's from a post war airshow in New zealand; and it shows a sight familiar to any one who flies AH:

Two planes touch, and one loses it's tail. The tailless plane immeadiatly rears nose up until it's speed decays, then flutters about, ultimately smacking the water nose first; followed very quickly by the second Beau.

Very tragic.

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
AH FM flaw or miss-conception?
« Reply #44 on: February 18, 2003, 01:58:53 AM »
Just get a balsa glider and test the theory by flying it normally, then remove the tail and fly it.