Author Topic: Taking bets  (Read 716 times)

Offline Gyro/T69

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 386
Taking bets
« Reply #15 on: March 07, 2003, 09:21:06 PM »
He's has a million men underarms right now a few hours from the border. If we even had the manpower sitting around waiting to go in.(And we don't) Would we put them all in transports for the bright white light? 50,000 or more gone in a flash. I really don't think so. How long would it take to disengaed for Iraq and move to Asia? A month or longer? By then, if the North's army is any good at all, the south would be overrun.

Offline Ping

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 957
Taking bets
« Reply #16 on: March 08, 2003, 03:45:52 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Frogm4n
last i checked its against the constitution of japan to attack in a offenceive matter, and im certain they would never do a first response attack again because of pearl harbor. The chinese do not trust the North Koreans so i see them going in and takeing action before we do if the koreans do start mass producing nukes(like isreal).

 
 
 Didn't Japan say that if NK test fired another missile over them that they would view it as an attack?
I/JG2 Enemy Coast Ahead


Offline Sox62

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1159
Taking bets
« Reply #17 on: March 08, 2003, 03:55:42 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Frogm4n
last i checked its against the constitution of japan to attack in a offenceive matter, and im certain they would never do a first response attack again because of pearl harbor. The chinese do not trust the North Koreans so i see them going in and takeing action before we do if the koreans do start mass producing nukes(like isreal).



Japan might consider the illegal kidnapping of it's citizens(which NK admitted to)to be an OFFENSIVE act.