Author Topic: Release the U.K.  (Read 1158 times)

Offline Nifty

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4400
Release the U.K.
« Reply #15 on: March 11, 2003, 03:53:28 PM »
bad udie!  bad bad bad!  ;)  never forget the smiley!

otherwise we'll think you're a mad, raving lunatic!

wait a second...  :D
proud member of the 332nd Flying Mongrels, noses in the wind since 1997.

Offline slimm50

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2684
Release the U.K.
« Reply #16 on: March 11, 2003, 04:05:08 PM »
Pre-WWI we were an isolationist country, until the Lusitannia(sp.?)  got torp'd. Then after that war we returned to an isolationist point of view. The League of Nations appeased Japan and Germany. So Japan ran rough-shod over Manchuria, and Hitler began his world conquest bid by overrunning Chec. and Poland. After WWII though we realized we couldn't turn a blind eye to world events, so we got involved. Maintained our military might which we had built up during the last war, and when N. K. invaded S.K. we, and the UN, were able to repulse them. Then came Vietnam, because the politicians faught that one instead of leaving it primarily to the generals, we got our heads handed to us.

My point here is that there are always gonna be some small-minded salamanders who want to rule the world. Isolationist views won't keep us out of the conflict, and in fact it allows the conflicts to escalate to world-class proportions. Stay involved, maintain our military strength, and go into any conflict with clear goals in mind and go in to win, no matter what. And let everyone know that, and if they don't like it, they can at least stay out of the way.

(steps down off th soap box and shuffles off to th nearest ice house for a pitcher of MGD)

Offline Lazerus1

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 382
Release the U.K.
« Reply #17 on: March 11, 2003, 10:28:11 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hortlund
Isolationism doesnt work. Especially not for a country depending on cheap oil. Sorry, you are stuck with the rest of us.


We have more than enough cheap oil in our country to last for decades, without importing another drop. If we wanted the oil, we could have taken it the first time, and any time after that.

Offline Charon

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3705
Release the U.K.
« Reply #18 on: March 11, 2003, 10:43:10 PM »
What is the state  of our domestic crude reserves again compared to EIA consumption forecasts for the next decade, Lazerus? US Geologic survey figures are fine, generally acceptable.

Charon

Offline akak

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 986
      • http://www.479thraiders.com
Release the U.K.
« Reply #19 on: March 11, 2003, 10:47:42 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Martlet
I would LOVE an isolationist era.

I'm AMAZED at how much money we still send to countries, even the ones we aren't exactly friendly with.

Cut the cash, close the borders, take out the trash.



You don't read any history books all that much do you?  Did you know that the Japanese actually thought their attack on Pearl Harbor would cause the U.S. to seek a peaceful resolution because of our isolationist attitudes at the time?

So no thanks, I don't want us to stick our heads in the sand again.


Ack-Ack

Offline Frogm4n

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2371
Release the U.K.
« Reply #20 on: March 11, 2003, 10:49:55 PM »
yea isolationism worked for china all those years real well. and it worked great for the USSR. You know nazi germany didnt import anything as well. and they sure didnt have a standard of living problem. wait yes they did.

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
Release the U.K.
« Reply #21 on: March 11, 2003, 11:11:06 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Udie
I have an even better one,  go to france and remove our dead from saving their sorry tulips in WW2 and then nuke the toejam out of them till they are all dead.


i'll go to bed smiling after readin that one.

i'm of the opinion a united coalition could have forced saddam into exile. the war could have been avoided. now american boys are gonna have to die to get saddam outta iraq. thanks a bunch, france.

i'm with yah udie.. somtimes , yah just gotta say 'diddly the smiley'.
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Release the U.K.
« Reply #22 on: March 11, 2003, 11:21:49 PM »
Quote
"The following year, De Gaulle withdrew France from the NATO military command and asked President Lyndon Johnson to remove U.S. troops from France. A seething Secretary of State Dean Rusk flew to Paris to seek clarification: "Does your order include the bodies of American soldiers in France's cemeteries?"
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Release the U.K.
« Reply #23 on: March 11, 2003, 11:22:21 PM »
Oh, yeah......

:)
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
Release the U.K.
« Reply #24 on: March 12, 2003, 01:43:32 AM »
You know it was not that simple.

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Release the U.K.
« Reply #25 on: March 12, 2003, 01:51:23 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by straffo
You know it was not that simple.



Never is with the french now is it.... Oh well we'll do it the french way then, give up..

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
Release the U.K.
« Reply #26 on: March 12, 2003, 02:19:26 AM »
When you are a soverign country do you give full control of your army to another country ?

If so why isn't the US army controlled by Canada for exemple ?

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Release the U.K.
« Reply #27 on: March 12, 2003, 02:59:59 AM »
So you are saying france left NATO beacuse it wanted to maintain military independence and decision making authority and they couldn't do that within the NATO framework becuse other countires might not share the same defense priorities as france?

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
Release the U.K.
« Reply #28 on: March 12, 2003, 03:43:22 AM »
yes it's exactly that.

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Release the U.K.
« Reply #29 on: March 12, 2003, 03:54:01 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by straffo
yes it's exactly that.


Glad to have your support for the USA's stance vis a vis the UN, France, Germany Russia etc. on the current Iraq crisis.