Author Topic: Because Rip doesn't want politics in the Franks thread.  (Read 756 times)

Offline weazel

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1471
That's funny.....
« Reply #15 on: March 22, 2003, 07:03:36 PM »
IIRC Tumor has been in about 16 years.

What about the Senior officers...or do you think OCS commisions Generals right out of school?

What about Non-Coms?

Based on the intelligence level displayed in your post you probably do.....

Quote
"He doesn't realize that very little of the military over in Iraq right now served when clinton was in office."


WJC *still* appreciates your support Mini-D...maybe you can contribute to electing Hillary if she runs for president.

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Re: That's funny.....
« Reply #16 on: March 22, 2003, 07:15:25 PM »
Are you really this stupid or do you try extra hard? You're actually suggesting that a voluntary mass exodus of the military (career or otherwise) in protest of administrations coming to power that have, as part of their platform, a policy dedicated to cutting the defense budget to the bone is the most logical action to take? That has to be one of the dumbest attempts at making a "point" I've ever seen anywhere. Congrats. :D

Quote
Originally posted by weazel
IIRC Tumor has been in about 16 years.

What about the Senior officers...or do you think OCS commisions Generals right out of school?

What about Non-Coms?

Based on the intelligence level displayed in your post you probably do.....



WJC *still* appreciates your support Mini-D...maybe you can contribute to electing Hillary if she runs for president.

Offline Mini D

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6897
      • Fat Drunk Bastards
Because Rip doesn't want politics in the Franks thread.
« Reply #17 on: March 22, 2003, 07:39:01 PM »
Ah weazel.. don't argue based on stupidity... try something different for a change.

I did 8 years in the military myself.  Not many re-enlist.  Check on the enlistment times weazel.  You may also want to check on the average age of the combatants.  I do believe you have no idea what the military is really made up of.

MiniD

Offline Mini D

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6897
      • Fat Drunk Bastards
Because Rip doesn't want politics in the Franks thread.
« Reply #18 on: March 22, 2003, 07:43:01 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Mini D
I do believe you have no idea what the military is really made up of.
LOL! What was I thinking?  This isn't the type of thing that ever got in your way before.

MiniD

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27251
Because Rip doesn't want politics in the Franks thread.
« Reply #19 on: March 22, 2003, 08:38:30 PM »
Weazel, did you crawl in a hole in January 2001? ;)

The U.S. military budget request for Fiscal Year 2003 was $396.1 billion
The U.S. military budget request for Fiscal Year 2002 was $343.2 billion.
The U.S. military budget request for Fiscal Year 2001 was $305 billion And Congress had increased that budget request to $310 billion.
GEEEE Weazel, wonder why they had to up it? :D

[size=8]This was up from approximately $288.8 billion, in 2000., CLINTONS LAST YEAR[/SIZE]
 
http://www.globalissues.org/Geopolitics/ArmsTrade/Spending.asp

Yes Weazel, good thing Bush increased spending in the last 2.5 years. ;)

Offline weazel

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Re: That's funny.....
« Reply #20 on: March 22, 2003, 08:54:28 PM »
Why are you attacking me Arlo....it was Mini-D that suggested a "mass exodus"?

Spin, Spin, Spin.

Quote
Originally posted by Arlo
Are you really this stupid or do you try extra hard? You're actually suggesting that a voluntary mass exodus of the military (career or otherwise) in protest of administrations coming to power that have, as part of their platform, a policy dedicated to cutting the defense budget to the bone is the most logical action to take? That has to be one of the dumbest attempts at making a "point" I've ever seen anywhere. Congrats. :D


Rip, Average annual military spending during peacetime Cold War (excluding Korean and Vietnam War years) = $285.4 Billion.

In FY 1999, the United States spent over $276 billion on its military.

 This figure includes outlays of the Pentagon and the Department of Energy nuclear weapons programs plus more than $27 billion spent on the intelligence agencies--about half on tactical military intelligence and half for intelligence agencies, including the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the National Security Agency.

With this budget, the Pentagon fields a military force without rival in the world. It sustains over 1.4 million men and women in active duty plus another 870,000 in the reserves.

Standing forces include 10 active Army divisions, three Marine divisions, 13 active and seven reserve Air Force fighter wings, and 12 aircraft carrier battle groups (11 active), plus around 7,200 deployed nuclear warheads capable of being launched from the ground affixed to MX and Minuteman missiles, by sea from Trident submarines, and by air from B-52 and B-2 bombers.

The Pentagon has basically completed its post-cold war drawdown and, with minor reductions, plans to sustain this force structure indefinitely.

 The Pentagon budget also includes over 770,000 civilian employees, almost 40% of total executive branch civilian personnel.

Looks like Bubba held the line ehh?  With the collapse of the Soviet Union do you really think we needed to keep defense spending at the level of the Reagan years?

WJC and Hillary appreciate your support Mini-D.
« Last Edit: March 22, 2003, 09:23:22 PM by weazel »

Offline Tumor

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4272
      • Wait For It
Because Rip doesn't want politics in the Franks thread.
« Reply #21 on: March 23, 2003, 12:31:32 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Mini D
Ah weazel.. don't argue based on stupidity... try something different for a change.

I did 8 years in the military myself.  Not many re-enlist.  Check on the enlistment times weazel.  You may also want to check on the average age of the combatants.  I do believe you have no idea what the military is really made up of.

MiniD


Your about 2 years behind the times Mini... enlistments are meeting quota's and re-enlistments (especially USAF) are far more common than people think... more have reenlisted under my watch than have seperated.

Mini I expect you have a disgruntled attitude towards the military.. most who seperate do with the exception of those who find good paying jobs that coincide with the end of an enlistment (something not all that common). Overall, it's an awesome career and I have no regrets.  There are some major sacrifices as you apparently know well, and I never knock anyone for leaving, to each his own.  However... your view seem's to stem from something I've not seen.  I'd say the vast majority of leadership, down to Squad Level, of us taking part in current crisis operations were in fact "around" for Desert Storm... there's LOTS of experiance, trust me.
"Dogfighting is useless"  :Erich Hartmann

Offline Mini D

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6897
      • Fat Drunk Bastards
Because Rip doesn't want politics in the Franks thread.
« Reply #22 on: March 23, 2003, 12:39:25 PM »
I do not have a disgruntled attitude towards the military.  I have experience with it.  I've always viewed that experience as irreplacable.

Retirement benifits were reduced during the 90's.  The incentive for re-enlistment were even less than when I was in.  I have not brought up a "he drove them away" argument... simply that turnover in those circumstances is great.

As far as re-enlistments over the last two years go... I'm trying to think about what has drastically changed since then.

Its not about being disgruntled.  It is simply about eroneously trying to take credit when no real participation occurred.

MiniD

Offline Mini D

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6897
      • Fat Drunk Bastards
Because Rip doesn't want politics in the Franks thread.
« Reply #23 on: March 23, 2003, 12:45:34 PM »
BTW tumor... I've never said that everyone left... that's a slight embeleshment by the other party involved.

I'll also say that your experience in the Air Force (I served there too) is not indicative of the average infantry experience.  The Air Force is quite the minority in the U.S. Military.  Once again... look at the average age of the combatants (Both officer and enlisted).  Do you really think its much over 21 for enlisted and 25 for commissioned?  From the guys in combat?

MiniD

Offline weazel

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1471
Thanks for weighing in Tumor.
« Reply #24 on: March 23, 2003, 12:48:39 PM »
I know two I served with in 1984 are still in the Army....both SFC according to People Finder at Military.Com

Hurry back ya right-wing carpet-bagger.

:p

Offline Tumor

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4272
      • Wait For It
Because Rip doesn't want politics in the Franks thread.
« Reply #25 on: March 23, 2003, 05:43:35 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Mini D

 Do you really think its much over 21 for enlisted and 25 for commissioned?  From the guys in combat?

MiniD


Majority... no

Platoon level... probably average.

Company... easily over 21/25.
"Dogfighting is useless"  :Erich Hartmann