Author Topic: Saddam  (Read 3077 times)

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Re: Saddam
« Reply #60 on: March 29, 2003, 07:33:16 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by OZkansas
This regime represents a potential source for weapons for terrorist.  The people of the USA will feel safer.


They are not the only people! i live just outside London, family work there - if there is a terrorist attack with bio/chem/nuke weapons we are screwed
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline crowMAW

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1179
Saddam
« Reply #61 on: March 31, 2003, 04:41:42 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Toad
What invalidates your comparison is that governmental forces in both of your examples remained essentially benign. They did not "pull the trigger" on their countrymen either because they weren't ordered to do so or because they refused such orders

You are either very uneducated or refuse to educate yourself about issues that are contrary what you "believe" to be true.  I will educate you on one example (I only need to show one example to invalidate your argument that it cannot be done): Romania's December 1989 Revolution.

Some background on Nicolai Ceausescu (in case you don't know how to pronounce it: say "chow - chess - que"): His people nicknamed him "Dracula II" because of his ruthless tactics in subjugating his people using the dreaded Securitate, or secret police.  Like Saddam, he had a minority problem in the north west region of his country...he called it the Hungarian Problem.  Like Saddam he figured he needed to get rid of these people.  The method he chose was radiation.  Every Hungarian minority that was ever arrested or brought in for questioning (including women and children) were bombarded with low level radiation in a process called "Radu".  The effect was a very slow death from cancer, which went untreated by what little Romanian healthcare system existed.  The west learned of this as it was noticed that every Hungarian deported from Romania during Ceausescu's reign died of cancer. Most Romanians suspected the practice existed, but of course it was never made public. Real nice guy. If you want to learn about some more of his atrocities get a book called "Red Horizons" by a former leader in the Securitate named Ion Pacepa...it will leave you physically ill.

Like Saddam, Ceausescu had his version of the Republican Guard, called the Worker's Guards or sometimes by it's old Soviet name, the Patriotic Guards. In 1989, it numbered close to 250,000, which augmented another 500,000 of regular troops.  On top of these troops the Securitate had 15,000 agents and 20,000 special Security Troops whose sole purpose was to put down demonstrations.  In 1987 he used the troops to forcefully put down a "riot" of 30,000 in the city of Brasov.

The revolution started unexpectedly. I will compress what happened over the several days of the revolution.  A priest named Laszlo Tokes was viewed as a dissident by the local Party officials in Timisoara. He preached tolerance and freedom to his congregation.  Tokes was ordered to leave his church and take a post in a very small village where he could do less harm.  He refused.  As a result an order was issued for his arrest as well as his family.  He was a Hungarian which meant certain death for his entire family.  His congregation, realizing that Tokes' arrest meant his death, protested by guarding the church.  The protest spread until over 1000 demonstrators were camped out.  The Party officials at first capitulated, but the crowd had turned from protesting Tokes' arrest warrant to a crowd chanting "FREEDOM".

The Securitate was called in and disbursed the crowd using batons and shovels. But the next day several thousand protestors began marching.  Outraged Ceausescu called a meeting of the Political Executive Committee and screamed at the Interior and Defense Ministers for their inability to quell the growing protest.  "Why didn't they shoot?", he demanded to know.  He then ordered the military to move in and fire on the demonstrators. The protest had spread to most of the city as tanks and infantry moved in to carry out Ceausescu's order.  Many soldiers did refuse to fire into the crowds, then estimated at nearly 50,000, and were executed by their commanders on the spot.  Tanks and artillery fired into the center of town while infantry shot those at the periphery.

In the end no accurate casualty count is known.  Soviet reporters wrote later that they had witnessed hundreds of bodies laying in the streets and watched bodies being dumped into the river or cremated in mass graves.  The hospitals of the region were overflowing with the wounded.

The next day, the protest continued.  A general strike was called in the region.  Later, thousands more protestors flooded the streets and charged the army pushing them out of the city.  Three days later, the dissident leaders addressed the city from an opera house bombed by artillery rounds and declared Timisoara a free city.

As news leaked out, unrest spread to Bucharest. Riots began in the capital and continued despite the military being called in to stop the revolt. Ceausescu attempted to turn the revolt by staging a forced pro-Ceausescu demonstration.  But the demonstrators threw down their pro-Ceausescu signs and began chanting "Death to Ceausescu".  The Securitate guarding the mob were overrun and were stripped of their weapons.

At this point several military brigades in Bucharest switched sides and started to move towards the Committee building along with the protestors.  Ceausescu, fearing for his life, boarded a helicopter and attempted to escape.  His helicopter ran out of fuel in the countryside and he was forced to hide.  The dissidents began a hunt for him and all the while had running battles with the Securitate, Security Troops and loyal Worker's Guards.  Terrorist type strikes by loyal forces continued for months even after the revolution "ended".  Ceausescu was eventually found, tried and executed on Christmas day...a banned holiday under his dictatorship.  The entire revolution started and ended in December 1989.

Did some of the military switch allegiances...yes, but not until it was obvious that Ceausescu was finished.

If 20 million Iraqis decide that it is time for Saddam to go...he would be gone.  BTW, it would be impossible for Saddam to insure the complete loyalty of all of his troops.  Saddam uses a conscripted army...all young men must serve at some point, which means if there is some % of the population that wants Saddam out, close to that same % exists in the army.

Offline crowMAW

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1179
Saddam
« Reply #62 on: March 31, 2003, 04:49:04 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by BGBMAW
Crow..didnt we help a great deal in Iran?

Did we and the British help prop up the Shah...yes.  Amaco and BP had the largest oil consessions in Iran prior to the revolution.

Offline X2Lee

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1074
Saddam
« Reply #63 on: March 31, 2003, 04:56:43 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hristo
Iraqi people fight for freedom now.

Maybe bodybags will teach US a lesson.


Maybe I punch you ion the nose teach you one too maggot.

Offline crowMAW

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1179
Re: Crowmaw.. your a dumb##
« Reply #64 on: March 31, 2003, 05:02:56 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by JoeSmoe
Lets say I take a Gun to you and your  family, in a room, and say,.. Hey Give me your money. ARE You GOING TO NOT give me your money and have me kill you AND your family?  Jesus, I hope you say that you will give me the money.


I have three choices...I can give you the money; my 17, 18, and 19 year old football player sons and I can overpower you, take your gun and shoot you with it; or my 3 sons and I can pull our own guns and shoot you first.

We are talking an internal revolution here.  There are 22 million Iraqi people, only 1 million in the army (and not all loyal to Saddam).  Do the math...would some die, yes people do in any revolution...would Saddam be gone, yes.

Ever hear the quote, "Give me liberty or give me death!"??  If the guys who lived by that slogan were as big a radish as you must be in order to say, "Jesus, I hope you say that you will give me the money," we would still be a British colony.

Offline Puke

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 759
      • http://members.cox.net/barking.pig/puke.htm
Saddam
« Reply #65 on: March 31, 2003, 09:42:07 PM »
Quote
4. All countries in the world will be free from fear. UN will be a wealth that all countries in the world will participate.  -aper-


The UN certainly is a wealth!

Quote
Since the program (oil for food) began operating, in December 1996, the U.N. has shepherded about $64 billion in Iraqi oil sales, and more than $39 billion in relief purchases, plus billions more for projects such as compensation to foreign victims of the first Gulf War. To cover its administrative costs, the U.N. collects a 2.2 percent commission on Iraqi oil sales, a setup that over the course of the program has generated more than $1 billion for U.N. coffers.


this is interesting too:

Quote
Beyond that, if you like Enron-style transparency, you have to love Oil-for-Food. At any given time, the program oversees billions in Iraq's money, awaiting the sludge-slow U.N. process of allocation and disbursement. For the first few years the U.N. parked the cash in a French bank, the Banque Nationale de Paris. More recently, it diversified the funds--currently totaling some $13 billion--among a handful of banks. But the U.N. provides no bank statements to the public, does not disclose the names of the banks, and won't even say what countries they're based in. Auditing is an in-house affair, conducted by government employees of a rotating trio of member states, chaired this year by France.


complete article:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/002/459pqvob.asp
« Last Edit: March 31, 2003, 10:15:08 PM by Puke »

Offline Martlet

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4390
Re: Re: Crowmaw.. your a dumb##
« Reply #66 on: March 31, 2003, 10:01:46 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by crowMAW
I have three choices...I can give you the money; my 17, 18, and 19 year old football player sons and I can overpower you, take your gun and shoot you with it; or my 3 sons and I can pull our own guns and shoot you first.

We are talking an internal revolution here.  There are 22 million Iraqi people, only 1 million in the army (and not all loyal to Saddam).  Do the math...would some die, yes people do in any revolution...would Saddam be gone, yes.

Ever hear the quote, "Give me liberty or give me death!"??  If the guys who lived by that slogan were as big a radish as you must be in order to say, "Jesus, I hope you say that you will give me the money," we would still be a British colony.


Sorry to disagree, but you obviously have no idea what you are talking about.

Offline MOSQ

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1198
Saddam
« Reply #67 on: March 31, 2003, 10:06:50 PM »
crowMaw,
Two quick observations I'd like your comments on:

1) The American Revolutionary War which you keep citing as an example of a people rising up and overthrowing their militarily more powerful oppressors was stuck in a no-win situation for the patriots for years.  We would win a battle, the Brits would win a battle. We captiure a city, the Brits capture a city. What event finally brought the war to a succeful ending of the stalemate ?

As much as I hate  to say it today, the entry of the French, in particular the French Navy. If not for them, the war would have gone on much longer, or possibly even have been lost.

2) Cambodia. What event overthrew the maniac Pol Pot, who it is estimated murdered a million Cambodians ? It certainly was NOT a popular uprising of the Cambodian people !

The Vietnamese had finally had enough of the butchery next door, and sent their army into Cambodia to end Pol Pot.  Communists attacking Communists, because Pol Pot was insane.

Under your scenario the Cambodian people should have risen up and defeated their oppressors. Only in your scenario several million more would be dead.

Is my history correct ?


See Pol Pot's history

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
Saddam
« Reply #68 on: March 31, 2003, 10:08:42 PM »
and where was the Pope.. or the UN ?
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Saddam
« Reply #69 on: March 31, 2003, 10:17:23 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by crowMAW
The Securitate was called in and disbursed the crowd using batons and shovels....

"Why didn't they shoot?", he demanded to know.  He then ordered the military to move in and fire on the demonstrators. The protest had spread to most of the city as tanks and infantry moved in to carry out Ceausescu's order.  Many soldiers did refuse to fire into the crowds,...and were executed by their commanders on the spot.  

The Securitate guarding the mob were overrun and were stripped of their weapons.

At this point several military brigades in Bucharest switched sides and started to move towards the Committee building along with the protestors.



Thanks for making my point.

In the 1989 Romanian Coup d'Etat 1104 people died in December 1989. Before December 22nd 162 people died, 73 in Timisoara, 48 in Bucharest and 41 somewhere else in Romania. 3352 people were wounded. Some of the first victims were sent to Bucharest and cremated. The military had 260 dead, and 545 wounded. The "Securitatea" 65 dead and 73 wounded.

OTOH, in 91 in the North and in the South, Saddam's forces did shoot. Did remain engaged for a month until it was over. Did not switch sides. Estimates are 20,000 dead in Basra alone.



Quote
But senior Arab diplomats told the London-based Arabic daily newspaper al-Hayat in October that Iraqi leaders were privately acknowledging that 250,000 people were killed during the uprisings, with most of the casualties in the south.46 Independent investigation to verify this figure has not been possible, nor has it yet been possible to determine how many of these casualties were noncombatants.

As I said before, there's the difference.
 
I see you dodged the question of how the Kurds managed an Independent Kurdistan once the US/UK/France established the no-fly zone. They lost without it, won with external support. And have held it since.
« Last Edit: March 31, 2003, 10:28:17 PM by Toad »
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Siaf__csf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2213
Saddam
« Reply #70 on: April 01, 2003, 12:30:50 AM »
"I have three choices...I can give you the money; my 17, 18, and 19 year old football player sons and I can overpower you, take your gun and shoot you with it; or my 3 sons and I can pull our own guns and shoot you first."


Lol you can slow down darwinism by breeding like crazy, but your perish is inevitable. If you're willing to risk your and your sons lives for a few bucks.. adios.

The majority of break-in homicides happen when the resident is armed and ready to fight. It's more likely for the resident to die to his own bullet after the perp seized the gun than for the perp to be shot by the resident.

Offline Saintaw

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6692
      • My blog
Simple correction
« Reply #71 on: April 01, 2003, 12:36:44 AM »
Quote

1. Iraqi will have an opportunity to taste freedom and install a government they chose.


Should be read as

Quote

1. Iraqi will have an opportunity to taste freedom and install a government The US administration will chose.
Saw
Dirty, nasty furriner.

Offline MOSQ

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1198
Saddam
« Reply #72 on: April 01, 2003, 12:48:25 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hristo
Iraqi people fight for freedom now.

Maybe bodybags will teach US a lesson.



hristo, I don't know where you're from, but u can be sure I will never lift a finger to back you up virtually or in reality.

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13958
Saddam
« Reply #73 on: April 01, 2003, 08:21:01 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Siaf__csf
[B
The majority of break-in homicides happen when the resident is armed and ready to fight. It's more likely for the resident to die to his own bullet after the perp seized the gun than for the perp to be shot by the resident. [/B]


This is pure tripe. Perhaps you are not aware of what actually goes o in the States since your posts indicate you are from Angola. You are very sadly mistaken in your premise. Most breakin homicides are the result of an unarmed victim and an armed intruder. I have been to more than one of those in my career.
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Saddam
« Reply #74 on: April 01, 2003, 08:23:33 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by MOSQ
hristo, I don't know where you're from, but u can be sure I will never lift a finger to back you up virtually or in reality.


Too late Mosq.

He's from the former Yugoslavia according to Grunherz.

So, you've already lifted more than a finger.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!