Author Topic: Is Anti-War the same as Anti-Troops? (Read 1947 times)

blitz · « **Reply #60 on:** March 30, 2003, 08:03:55 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Toad
Blitz, I'd settle for calling off the whole war if you had to personally stand and watch every torture and murder committed in Iraq by Saddam or his representatives[/edit> for the next year.

Damned, how could ya government get to sleep at night in all those long years Saddam Hussein was their friend and they supported Saddam Hussein with any weapon he wants, intelligence + WMDs,very well knowing that he slaughtered his own people, tortured some, murdered some personally and used WMDs daily in his Angriffskrieg against Iran 1980-1988?

That's totally beyond human imagination

Regards Blitz

btw If ya want to know something about someone who likes torture of his own people,too, drive by to hell and ask the 'Schah of Persia' and his secret police guys from 'Savak'

America was threatened by Iraq in no way, it was just plain ridiculous, it's an "Angriffskrieg"

2 Million people was killed in Vietnam, 3 million injured. What for?

bowser · « **Reply #61 on:** March 30, 2003, 08:07:31 AM »

"...aid and comfort to the enemy, bowser. you may have heard of it...".

Bit of a leap from emboldening the enemy with anti-war protests to providing him with aid and comfort don’t ‘ya think?

Any yes, I have heard of the term. Article3, Section3: Treason if I recall correctly. However, unlike you I actually understand what it means. If you brush up on your knowledge of the constitution and the laws that pertain to this particular subject, you’ll see there’s a big difference between supporting the other side and disagreeing with your side. You’ll also find that to prove treason, you have to “prove intent to aid the enemy in connection with active contact and coordination with said enemy”. Key words....contact and coordination.

You seem to have a hard time understanding my illustrations but....Hanoi Jane. She actually made contact with the enemy. Many people believe she could have been successfully prosecuted for treason. Far different story from people voicing their opinion in the streets around the world.

bowser

Toad · « **Reply #62 on:** March 30, 2003, 08:43:38 AM »

Well, we finally managed to get over our guilt about trading with Nazi Germany in the early '30's too. But it also took a war.

And just look... after it was all over and the rebuilding had been done....... we were friends again. Isn't history funny, with all its twists and turns?

But, if we REALLY wanted to know anything about torturing people, murdering millions and genocide we'd stop by hell and see how your countrymen are doing, wouldn't we? I think they may still be the reigning champions, unless they're tied with Stalin and his boys.

Hey, did you know we were once allied with Stalin too? But, as you can see, that problem's been solved too.

Funny thing.. we were friendly at one time or another with both of these murdering genocidal regimes. We also played key roles in destroying those regimes.

Funniest thing is...... afterwards there was quite a friendly relationship in both cases. Go figure.

Isn't history funny, with all its twists and turns?

Isn't history funny, with all its twists and turns?

Isn't history funny, with all its twists and turns?

Isn't history funny, with all its twists and turns?

But we digress... you keep dragging up old history and blaming Saddam on us. I don't agree with your opinion.

Point is, in any event we're fixing the Saddam problem right now.

And you choose to side AGAINST the removal of a man that will be amongst his peers when he finally get to hell and meets your famous countrymen as well as Stalin.

THAT'S really funny, eh? You against the removal of a man like Hitler or Stalin.

REALLY funny. But not funny "ha-ha".

blitz · « **Reply #63 on:** March 30, 2003, 09:27:50 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Toad
Well, we finally managed to get over our guilt about trading with Nazi Germany in the early '30's too. But it also took a war.

And just look... after it was all over and the rebuilding had been done....... we were friends again. Isn't history funny, with all its twists and turns?

But, if we REALLY wanted to know anything about torturing people, murdering millions and genocide we'd stop by hell and see how your countrymen are doing, wouldn't we? I think they may still be the reigning champions, unless they're tied with Stalin and his boys.

Hey, did you know we were once allied with Stalin too? But, as you can see, that problem's been solved too.

Funny thing.. we were friendly at one time or another with both of these murdering genocidal regimes. We also played key roles in destroying those regimes.

Funniest thing is...... afterwards there was quite a friendly relationship in both cases. Go figure.

Isn't history funny, with all its twists and turns?

Isn't history funny, with all its twists and turns?

Isn't history funny, with all its twists and turns?

Isn't history funny, with all its twists and turns?

But we digress... you keep dragging up old history and blaming Saddam on us. I don't agree with your opinion.

Point is, in any event we're fixing the Saddam problem right now.

And you choose to side AGAINST the removal of a man that will be amongst his peers when he finally get to hell and meets your famous countrymen as well as Stalin.

THAT'S really funny, eh? You against the removal of a man like Hitler or Stalin.

REALLY funny. But not funny "ha-ha".

To draw a line between Hitler, Stalin and Saddam Hussein is the most ridiculous thing ever.

It's like sayin America is like Nazy- Germany, totally dumb.

Read some history books and get a clue.

The only reason your government wants to get rid of Saddam Hussein is because he made 1 wrong move when he invaded Kuwait. That was against your selfinterests. If he wouldn'd have invaded Kuwait he would have been your friend till today.

Has absolutely nothing to do with Freedom, Democrazy,Humanty, or such. These items are only used for selling bad politics to the world

Regards Blitz

btw If ya want to know something about someone who likes torture of his own people,too, drive by to hell and ask the 'Schah of Persia' and his secret police guys from 'Savak'

Or former president Somoza from Nicaragua

America was threatened by Iraq in no way, it was just plain ridiculous, it's an "Angriffskrieg"

Perle kicked, who's next?

X2Lee · « **Reply #64 on:** March 30, 2003, 01:29:52 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by blitz
To draw a line between Hitler, Stalin and Saddam Hussein is the most ridiculous thing ever.

It's like sayin America is like Nazy- Germany, totally dumb.

Read some history books and get a clue.

Regards Blitz

America was threatened by Iraq in no way, it was just plain ridiculous, it's an "Angriffskrieg"

Perle kicked, who's next?

Ummm, hussien is hitler. And in your last sig line is that a funny aimed at the guy who got shot on video? Daniel pearle?
Sick bastard.

there were no extermination camps in Germany, its just redickulus..

blitz · « **Reply #65 on:** March 30, 2003, 02:39:20 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by X2Lee
Ummm, hussien is hitler. And in your last sig line is that a funny aimed at the guy who got shot on video? Daniel pearle?
Sick bastard.

there were no extermination camps in Germany, its just redickulus..

Jfyi, it's Richard Perle, read a newspaper once a year

Oil- err Rums-feld next?

Regards Blitz

America was threatened by Iraq in no way, it was just plain ridiculous, it's an "Angriffskrieg"

Toad · « **Reply #66 on:** March 30, 2003, 03:10:38 PM »

Say what you want.

You're parading and protesting to keep a mass murderer in power.

YOU are the one trying to stop his removal.

blitz · « **Reply #67 on:** March 30, 2003, 03:20:37 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Toad
Say what you want.

You're parading and protesting to keep a mass murderer in power.

YOU are the one trying to stop his removal.

Wrong ! We protest against a preemtive strike warmonger politic that can create exactly what it wants to deny. Terrorism!!

And when we see more terrorism out of this we naturely need another little, clean, chirugical war......

Regards Blitz

America was threatened by Iraq in no way, it was just plain ridiculous, it's an "Angriffskrieg"

Toad · « **Reply #68 on:** March 30, 2003, 03:33:55 PM »

Well, delude yourself all you like.

The violations of the UN SC resolutions are clear and are long standing.

His murder and genocide are undeniable.

You are protesting to stop his removal.

Arlo · « **Reply #69 on:** March 30, 2003, 03:57:59 PM »

Hehe ... I still love Nash's avatar.

X2Lee · « **Reply #70 on:** March 30, 2003, 04:05:14 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by blitz
Jfyi, it's Richard Perle, read a newspaper once a year

Oil- err Rums-feld next?

Regards Blitz

America was threatened by Iraq in no way, it was just plain ridiculous, it's an "Angriffskrieg"

it doenst matter if I knew his name, what matters is that you have that in your sig.

they say these forums are moderated but seems you can post
any offence you like.

making fun of hostages is pond scum.