« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: A-10 fires on British vehicles?  (Read 1254 times)

Offline qts

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 782
      • None yet
A-10 fires on British vehicles?
« Reply #15 on: March 31, 2003, 12:50:13 PM »
I don't have too much of a problem with the A10 strafing the convoy once - mistakes happen - but he turned and strafed again. This showed that he had evaluated the situation and made a conscious decision to return.

There needs to be an immediate court-martial and the pilot better have some extremely good reasons.
Logged

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13935
A-10 fires on British vehicles?
« Reply #16 on: April 01, 2003, 08:29:50 AM »
You need to be in combat sometime. You have no clue about the distances involved and what is actually visible even frm the air.

A courts marshal is done AFTER an investigation is concluded, not as an investigation. Try letting the system work before you pass judgement from your nice safe living room. :rolleyes:
Logged
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline Dowding

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6867
      • http://www.psys07629.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/272/index.html
A-10 fires on British vehicles?
« Reply #17 on: April 01, 2003, 09:20:14 AM »
How about those passing judgement from the seat of an APC as the cannon shells rip into their vehicle?
Logged
War! Never been so much fun. War! Never been so much fun! Go to your brother, Kill him with your gun, Leave him lying in his uniform, Dying in the sun.

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13935
A-10 fires on British vehicles?
« Reply #18 on: April 01, 2003, 10:36:40 PM »
Dowding, if you are referring to the quotes posted earlier, it was speculation on the part of the trooper as to the pilots state of mind. I would expect him to have fairly strong feelings about the incident but he does not have the information the pilot was operating with. Please understand I am NOT excusing the pilot. If there was an egregious violation of ROE (rules of engagement) or malicious act I expect the pilot to be held accountable. I do not know, and neither does anyone else here including you, what instructions the pilot was given on his mission briefing. If he was given information that indicated no friendlies were supposed to be in his "kill box" what do you expect him to do on seeing an armored vehicle there?

My post was for the instantaneous judgement of the little arm chair generals who have no clue about combat or the conditions that existed at the time.

I have posted before on other "friendly fire" issues that there will be an investigation and to  those whose job it is to find out the truth take care of it. Friendly fire incidents are more noteworthy now than in the past because they happen less often now than in past conflicts. My feeling is to wait for the investigation THEN be all rightous about it. Perhaps after both sides are aired. Getting only the version of one side of the incident is not  necessarily what really happened.
Logged
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline rc51

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 729
A-10 fires on British vehicles?
« Reply #19 on: April 01, 2003, 11:01:53 PM »
That just plain sux!!
We need to be way more carefull.
Logged

Offline Frogm4n

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2371
A-10 fires on British vehicles?
« Reply #20 on: April 01, 2003, 11:56:53 PM »
if your a a10 ace pilot and you cant tell what a british apc and a iraqi apc looks like you need to be in a new line of work. especially when the british apc has a big ole union jack on it and you are makeing multiple pass's on it.
Logged

Offline anonymous

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 984
A-10 fires on British vehicles?
« Reply #21 on: April 02, 2003, 12:16:07 AM »
its pretty damn tough to id various apc types from 500 feet up as a helo passenger at 150 miles an hour, and different flags and such look alot alike as well. its gotta be tougher when you are flying CAS. if the dude was negligent hell be punished. theres no "ten brits equal one american" rule when it comes to negligent manslaughter. but it takes an investigation to find out what happened. i gurantee you guys that negligent or not that a10 driver has come close to sucking on a pistol more than once since it happened.
Logged

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13935
A-10 fires on British vehicles?
« Reply #22 on: April 02, 2003, 09:01:27 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Frogm4n
if your a a10 ace pilot and you cant tell what a british apc and a iraqi apc looks like you need to be in a new line of work. especially when the british apc has a big ole union jack on it and you are makeing multiple pass's on it.


Frogman,

You need to try and learn what it is like to identify which apc / tank you are looking at in a plane moving more than a couple hundred miles an hour from a distance of over 3 miles. It's bad enough on the ground looking at one from 2000 meters away. There are SIGNIFICANT distance involved that make it extremely dificult to determine just exactly what it is you are seeing. Not excusing the pilot, just trying to correct a misconception that it is easy to tell the difference. It isn't.
Logged
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline Martlet

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4390
A-10 fires on British vehicles?
« Reply #23 on: April 02, 2003, 09:04:37 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Maverick
Frogman,

You need to try and learn what it is like to identify which apc / tank you are looking at in a plane moving more than a couple hundred miles an hour from a distance of over 3 miles. It's bad enough on the ground looking at one from 2000 meters away. There are SIGNIFICANT distance involved that make it extremely dificult to determine just exactly what it is you are seeing. Not excusing the pilot, just trying to correct a misconception that it is easy to tell the difference. It isn't.


This morning when they were interviewing wounded marines, a reporter asked them how he felt about the accusation that there weren't enough troops there now.

He answered something to the effect that they were so many there they were tripping over each other as it was.

Those of us that have been in engagements know that while it is comforting to have more than enough people to safely accomplish the task, too many opens up more dangers.

While these accidents are unfortunate, they are a part of every large scale battle.
Logged

Offline Replicant

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
A-10 fires on British vehicles?
« Reply #24 on: April 02, 2003, 09:34:15 AM »
This reminds me of an incident that happened in Serbia/Kosovo a few years back.  A Squadron Leader I know was telling me about a particular sortie.  The USAF had just attacked a large column and had run out of bombs and had requested RAF CAS.  The RAF went in and did a few circuits and looked through a special vibration free binoculars.  They soon noticed that it was a civilian convoy and broke off without even engaging.  It was later confirmed as a civilian convoy.

So, do A10 pilots look through binoculars before engaging (or imaging device)? (the RAF Harriers have a zoom camera built into the aircraft (on throttle switch and displays on MFD), plus FLIR, plus the binoculars as a last resort).  Do they use aircraft/tank recognition?

I think one problem might be that everyone knows what US vehicles/aircraft look like, but are the US fully familar with all of our variants?

The vehicle recogniton equipment supplied by the US was supposed to prevent friendly fire incidents.  A US Spokesman even went as far as saying 'if you display these you won't get shot at'.
Logged
NEXX

Offline leonid

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 239
A-10 fires on British vehicles?
« Reply #25 on: April 02, 2003, 09:58:37 AM »
Reminds me of the comments made by Canadian air units in WWII, flying Typhoons over Europe in '44.  Whenever they saw USAAF Thunderbolts in the area, they immediately aborted the mission, because they'd been attacked so many times by them.  It got so bad that finally the Canadians attacked a P-47 after it made multiple passes, shooting the Yank down.

My sympathies, and personal apologies, to the Brits :(
Logged
ingame: Raz

Offline batdog

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1533
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com/
A-10 fires on British vehicles?
« Reply #26 on: April 02, 2003, 10:05:16 AM »
That sucks. I hope if it was a "cowboy" act the proper measures are taken.

On another note... where did you get that quote? I just cant see a US plane opening up w/civilians near it. Was it at night, or daytime?
Logged
Of course, I only see what he posts here and what he does in the MA.  I know virtually nothing about the man.  I think its important for people to realize that we don't really know squat about each other.... definately not enough to use words like "hate".

AKDejaVu
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »