Author Topic: Porking fuel  (Read 623 times)

Offline bj229r

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6735
Porking fuel
« Reply #15 on: April 08, 2003, 06:04:53 PM »
I gotta agree with ALf here....WHAT does amount gas available have to do with how many gallons ya can put in plane?...if plane can only get 100 gallons due to a supply issue...then what ya are lookin for is plane with best miles per GALLON (or liter...for yall dopesmoking-maggotinfested-pinko-commie-libs) at any rate..the fact that a P38 flies forever on 25% and a spit or 109 goes about 5 min on 25% is ONLY because of the teeny tank...if ya put same amount of gas in each plane...they would stay aloft similar times. ..unless I was drivin the 38....would get kilt of course.
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers

http://www.flamewarriors.net/forum/

Offline Tilt

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
      • FullTilt
Porking fuel
« Reply #16 on: April 09, 2003, 01:51:53 PM »
Originally posted by Suave
In AW if fuel was porked you could only take planes that didn't require very high octane fuel .


AW4W yes
AW2 yes
AW3 (early) yes
AWME no......... the link between fuel quantity and qwuality was broken...........by AWME the zone limit was adjusted by the fuel attririon.
.

When fuel is porked planes that have small internal fuel stores SHOULD suffer more than planes that have large internal fuel stores .


I kinda agree with this from a game play perspective        however the % factor is all wrong................. its the gas guzzlers with big tanks that should be penalised............they are the more sensitive to fuel attrition

eg if ac 1 has a 200 gal tank and ac 2 has a 350 gal tank then fuel should be shared out in absolute quantities rather than %'s.

Hence when we consider 500 gals equal to 125% then at 75%  (300 gals per plane) ac 1 can take a full load of fuel plus  (upto 100 gals) drop tank (if available) but ac 2 has to take only up to 300 gals (86% of its max nom cap)
Ludere Vincere