Originally posted by AKIron
It's not hard for me to believe that someone who sorely abused his office as Governor, using state troopers to bring him prostitutes, wouldn't take what he could and encourage his staff to do so as well.
[/B]
Except that there is nothing in any legal record to indicate that this was the case... beyond Ari Fleischer and "unnamed" Bush administration staffers saying as such.
There were claims of defacement as well. This also is easy for me to believe, especially considering how pissed off he was over the impeachment. Believe what you like, I'll do the same.
And again, there was nothing in the GAO report indicating defacement of any kind during the final walkthrough on the morning before the inauguration. This fact proved irrefutable to the new Bush administration, since stating that defacement
had occurred regardless of what the report stated meant at least one of two things:
(1) The non-partisan bureaucrats tasked with making the report were incompetent and missed obvious details such as vandalized keyboards and missing supplies.
(2) The non-partisan bureaucrats tasked with making the report were biased and intentionally excluded vandalism from their report.
If the first case applies, the Bush administration would be forced to terminate the government employees responsible for gross incompetence. In the second case, legal action would follow termination of the employees. Yet nobody was fired, no lawsuits were filed against
bureaucrats (nevermind outgoing Clinton folks) surrounding the matter. Why? Because the Bush administration knew that firing competent and innocent government employees wasn't the way to go about gaining the trust and loyalty of the bureaucracy.
Nevermind the additional fact that officers in charge of Air Force One denied that any vandalism had taken place (despite reports of stolen china).
Honestly, AKIron, you're a smart guy. I'd hope that you wouldn't take things like this at just face value because of Clinton's untrustworthiness. Within Washington circles, the whole White House looting thing was considered a tarbaby to the incoming Bush administration, a real misstep brought about by Ari Fleischer speaking out of hand early on without realizing the implications of doing so. It's a lot different being Press Secretary to the President of the United States than it is being the spokesman for the governor of Texas.
-- Todd/Leviathn