Author Topic: Bubba's Bumbling  (Read 1907 times)

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
Bubba's Bumbling
« Reply #45 on: April 11, 2003, 06:23:09 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
There is not one fact nor shred of hard evidence in that entire post at the beginning of this thread.


I think ya gotta read the book dude.  It's a book review.

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Bubba's Bumbling
« Reply #46 on: April 11, 2003, 06:27:21 PM »
I was waiting for you to post the book Funked :)

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
Bubba's Bumbling
« Reply #47 on: April 11, 2003, 06:32:09 PM »
I don't have it.  Amazon recommended it to me so I found the most inflammatory review I could find and posted it here.  :)

Offline anonymous

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 984
Bubba's Bumbling
« Reply #48 on: April 11, 2003, 06:35:06 PM »
served under 4 different cics so far. only one where myself and others were ordered to attend cic speaking when visiting base where we were at was clinton. other cics republican and democrat the boys always showed up for speeches. clinton and friends knew it would look horrible if he go to speak at base in korea or elsewhere and almost no military personnel show up. stories about clinton staffers being anti military were true. that and clinton and secdef at time of somalia sacked admiral in charge theatre after mogadishu firefight to place blame on admiral after they deny admiral assets needed for operations in somalia. my fav quote was from one of his appointees a little girl talking to media who said "our best and brightest did not serve in viet nam".

Offline anonymous

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 984
Bubba's Bumbling
« Reply #49 on: April 11, 2003, 06:41:51 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sandman_SBM
Hmmm... the military built under Clinton just waltzed through Iraq in 21 days.


bull****. military not built by clinton or any president. military built by senior leadership of military. clinton negligent from lack of knolwedge on subject. for example he strip military of ability to fight on two fronts same time because he not see it happening during his presidency. this part of reason that north korea so brave. enemy intel types know that we not have carrier groups to engage in offensive operations in one area, cover other areas, and rotate carrier groups for necessary maintaning. we had the assets to do this under Regan and Bush like i say above ive been in for 4 cics so far and cic who make biggest difference with military was Regan but even he not change the way guys taught to shoot move fight and so on. clinton sure did some things right but foreign policy and military are not on that list.

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Bubba's Bumbling
« Reply #50 on: April 11, 2003, 06:46:46 PM »
Military is high on the list. Clinton is the one that authorized the POM that made all these advanced weapons and defensive systems possible.
sand

Offline SOB

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10138
Bubba's Bumbling
« Reply #51 on: April 11, 2003, 07:13:22 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sixpence
1. Can you guarantee that return? Of course you can't. You make it sound like everyone can just make a bundle in investments. People lose their shirts.


Everyone CAN make a bundle in investments.  And by bundle, I don't mean millions of dollars overnight, I mean steady growth for your retirement.  You invest your money, get a reasonable rate of return, let compounding interest work for you, and after thirty or forty years, you have a nice tidy sum.  The stock market goes up and down in the short term...in the long term it goes up, and so does your retirement fund.  And as you get closer to retirement, you can steadily transfer your assetts into more stable investments that earn less interest.  It's not rocket science, and I'm sure I'm just repeating **** you already know...so, uh, I'm not sure what we're arguing about.  Oh yeah, the guarantee.  Well, yeah, I think I can guarantee that the return will be better than SS provided it's not gambled on high risk stuff until the day you plan to retire.  If I'm wrong, look me up in 30 years and kick my ass.  :)


SOB
Three Times One Minus One.  Dayum!

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Bubba's Bumbling
« Reply #52 on: April 11, 2003, 07:14:26 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by anonymous
military not built by clinton or any president. military built by senior leadership of military. clinton negligent from lack of knolwedge on subject. he strip military of ability to fight on two fronts same time because he not see it happening during his presidency. this part of reason that north korea so brave. enemy intel types know that we not have carrier groups to engage in offensive operations in one area, cover other areas, and rotate carrier groups for necessary maintaning. we had the assets to do this under Regan and Bush like i say above ive been in for 4 cics so far and cic who make biggest difference with military was Regan but even he not change the way guys taught to shoot move fight and so on. clinton sure did some things right but foreign policy and military are not on that list.


Is anonymous = Tonto?

Offline anonymous

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 984
Bubba's Bumbling
« Reply #53 on: April 11, 2003, 07:21:56 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
Is anonymous = Tonto?


no dude had not played in big arenas yet when i first used bb so no player id so i used anonymous.

Offline Airhead

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3369
      • http://www.ouchytheclown.com
Bubba's Bumbling
« Reply #54 on: April 11, 2003, 07:46:06 PM »
LOL Don't cha feel like watermelon now MT??:D

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Bubba's Bumbling
« Reply #55 on: April 11, 2003, 07:48:46 PM »
ya.... a little :)

Offline Sixpence

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5265
      • http://www.onpoi.net/ah/index.php
Bubba's Bumbling
« Reply #56 on: April 12, 2003, 12:52:09 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by funkedup
1.  SS is a ponzi scheme.  If you don't know what it means, look it up.  It is not indefinitely sustainable and will collapse eventually.
2.  I defy anyone to find a 10 year period since the inception of SS where the SS return on investment outperformed the Dow.  Money invested in SS is money thrown down the drain.  If the same money had been put into the stock exchange, the country would be much richer in the long term.
3.  If SS were eliminated it could be replaced with need based government aid.  No need for retirees to starve like some alarmists say.
4.  Clinton did not "rebuild" the economy.  Presidents do not have a major effect on the economy.  Fiscal and monetary policies do affect the economy, but they are not directly controlled by the President, and they are only secondary effects.  The ups and downs of our economic indices are primarily a result of complex system dynamics of the economic behavior of our populace.  Humans evolved trade as a method to facilitate mutually beneficial economic transactions.  The best thing the government can do is get the hell out of the way and let us do our thing.


So what you are saying is that savings bonds are useless?Pyramid scheme too I guess.

Like I said, i'll keep putting into S.S., you can keep your money. But don't ask for S.S. when you get there.

Need based government aid..aka..welfare. So instead of them paying into their own retirement, you want them to collect tax paid welfare.

Ok, the Dow. Let's say you put 100,000 in the stock market. Over 5 years it grows 10%. Then over the next 5 years it loses 10%. How much money do you have? Oh yeah, everyone gets rich in the stock market. Over the past 5 years, for every one person who made money, can you tell me how many lost money? I have nothing against the stock market, but i'm not going to trust my retirement to it. I'de rather buy bonds. With all the scandel and the insider info, I don't have faith in it anymore, sorry. Inside info deals like Bush and martha stewart(to name a few) Scandels, like enron. It never ends. My 401k has taken such a beatin the market is going to have to really perform over the next 20 years for me to make a modest gain.

BTW, if S.S. were used just for retirement(like it should), it would never run out of money. Problem is that everyone who throws out their back or has any kind of disability collects from it. I think that money should come from elswhere. IMO.
« Last Edit: April 12, 2003, 01:26:27 AM by Sixpence »
"My grandaddy always told me, "There are three things that'll put a good man down: Losin' a good woman, eatin' bad possum, or eatin' good possum."" - Holden McGroin

(and I still say he wasn't trying to spell possum!)

Offline kbman

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 217
Bubba's Bumbling
« Reply #57 on: April 12, 2003, 01:21:37 AM »
heap big laugh kemosabe :D

kbman

Offline Sixpence

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5265
      • http://www.onpoi.net/ah/index.php
Bubba's Bumbling
« Reply #58 on: April 12, 2003, 01:30:30 AM »
Is that how you spell kemosabe?
"My grandaddy always told me, "There are three things that'll put a good man down: Losin' a good woman, eatin' bad possum, or eatin' good possum."" - Holden McGroin

(and I still say he wasn't trying to spell possum!)

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
Bubba's Bumbling
« Reply #59 on: April 12, 2003, 02:02:28 AM »
Quote
Like I said, i'll keep putting into S.S., you can keep your money. But don't ask for S.S. when you get there.


No I can't.  The money is stolen from my paycheck before I even see it.