From Harrison B. Tordoff, P-47 pilot, 353rd Fighter Group.
""We loved the P47 for it's toughness and reliability. It was heavy and looked cumbersome but in the hands of agood pilot, it could turn and climb with an Me 109 or an FW190. And nothing could outdive it. We had pilots bring back tree branches and tops of telephone poles in the wings of their P47s. A few even came home with top cylinders shot off. It could be belly landed in a forest if necessary. On an open field it crash landed abou as well as it landed on wheels.
The 8 .50 caliber machine gun were devastating on ground or air targets and the plane was a very stable gun platform.
On the negative side, the P47 burned fuel at full power at 450 GPH, if I remember right. It only carried 350 gallons internally. It got nose light in the stalls, and nose heavy in a dive-had a very nasty spin-violent and hard to stop. I spunt out in a slow turn at high altitude with full wing tanks once, by accident, while trying to keep in formation on a combat mission. It tore the wing tanks off and scared the hell out of me. But the general I way I felt in a 47 was invincible. I had complete faith in the plane and would excuse its shortcomings to anyone;""
So now is my questions

You guys who never flew a WW2 aircraft and barely a real one, what do you think the P47 flight model should be similar to in AH? Some said the Typhoon...geez, I don't think so. I see it more like the A8 with an awsome diving speed.
Go ahead guys, bombard me with 'the ultimate test flight report from Mars', or your personal feeling. What I would really enjoy is some another P47 pilot reports, I'm looking for some more hehehe. Would be good to have reports for people who flew others WW2 planes too.
Free beer for all, let's get drunk before the flame war! <S>
http://home.CFL.rr.com/rauns/menu.htm ------------------
Olivier "Frenchy" Raunier
[This message has been edited by SFRT - Frenchy (edited 06-17-2000).]