« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 6   Go Down

Author Topic: Forgotten Battles  (Read 2499 times)

Offline jEEZY

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 259
Forgotten Battles
« on: May 13, 2003, 09:00:24 AM »
Hi all,

I just played Forgotten Battles; Wow.  A very well done sim--lots of things about it just seem right: gunnery, aircraft management, light effects, etc.  Perhaps its just the novelty, but I really like the feeling of that game over AH.  In fact AH feels more like an arcade game after Forgotten Battles; wish it was Massively Multi-player.  

Anybody else think that the FM and such seem more realistic?

jEEZY
Logged

Offline LLv34_Camouflage

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2189
      • http://www.virtualpilots.fi/LLv34
Re: Forgotten Battles
« Reply #1 on: May 13, 2003, 09:10:08 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by jEEZY
In fact AH feels more like an arcade game after Forgotten Battles; wish it was Massively Multi-player.
 

I agree. Much of it is due to the easier gunnery, icons and graphics.

Oleg has said he is hoping to do a MMP flight sim based on the IL2 engine.


Quote

Anybody else think that the FM and such seem more realistic?
[/B]


The individual plane FMs are much more balanced in AH. Gameplay balance is the key issue, AH is much better there.

There are some FM issues in FB, but overall, FB gives a nice "suspension of disbelief".  The overall difficulty level is higher in FB, good for the challenge. :)

Camo
Logged
CO, Lentolaivue 34
Brewster's in AH!
"How about the power to kill a Yak from 200 yards away - with mind bullets!"

Offline mia389

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1180
Forgotten Battles
« Reply #2 on: May 13, 2003, 01:46:05 PM »
FB is really cool graphics but them guns I tell ya. Ill go through all my ammo and lucky if the plane ahead goes down. The damage model is really great to but I havent played it enough to find all the jewls in it.
Logged

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Forgotten Battles
« Reply #3 on: May 13, 2003, 02:00:36 PM »
played it online for the first time last night. My first shot with my jug 25 blew apart a 190 in a full crossing shot. I was supprised after my single player experiance.
As to the flight models..dont know. the fundimentals are there to have an extraordinary game. The models the graphics the sounds the terrains. Increadble. But online the stutering is pretty bad. And standalone the campaign is pretty farcicle. The pieces are increadable. But the overall is less then the sum.
Logged

Offline MoMoney

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 154
Forgotten Battles
« Reply #4 on: May 13, 2003, 02:57:09 PM »
The Flight models in FB's do indeed have "Issues."  Please don't confuse difficulty w/ accuracy.  Some elments in the Flight Models- like slow speed flight- are done better in FB's.  The rest of the "Flight Envelope" is much much better in AH.
Logged

Offline GA

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3419
      • http://www.332viking.no
Forgotten Battles
« Reply #5 on: May 14, 2003, 09:45:38 AM »
In my eyes AH have better multiplay regarding getting multi pilots playing at the same time and exelent Vox communcation.

But I have to say that FB is a more detailed/challanged and more realistic game then AH at the moment;).

AH gets more Arcade game after you tested FB;)
Logged

Offline OIO

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1520
Forgotten Battles
« Reply #6 on: May 14, 2003, 10:14:44 AM »
...until AH2 comes along!
Logged

Offline JoeSmoe

  • Parolee
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 62
Forgotten Battles
« Reply #7 on: May 15, 2003, 01:10:22 AM »
well, its not a super multiplayer game like aces high is, but it pretty much hands down beats it with the exception of the view system.


When, and if forgotten battles, or a game with that engine comes along, and is a multiplayer like aces high, well aces high better look out.
Logged

Offline Xjazz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
Forgotten Battles
« Reply #8 on: May 15, 2003, 01:47:31 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by OIO
...until AH2 comes along!



I doubt...
Logged

Offline gatt

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2441
Forgotten Battles
« Reply #9 on: May 15, 2003, 06:15:37 AM »
Are you joking, right? FB is a nice offline sim, with a beautiful 3D engine. However, his CEM is full of bugs and the whole sim needs a ton of fixes. A patch is inbound but, as for IL-2, it probably wont fix all the bugs and inaccuracies. Why? Time is money and next 1C projects needs manwork.

AH's FM is, generally speaking and IMHO, much better.

Take a look at the SimHQ BBS and read what even former beta-tester say about FB and his FM. You really should have been a beta tester to understand.
Logged
"And one of the finest aircraft I ever flew was the Macchi C.205. Oh, beautiful. And here you had the perfect combination of italian styling and german engineering .... it really was a delight to fly ... and we did tests on it and were most impressed." - Captain Eric Brown

Offline Xjazz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
Forgotten Battles
« Reply #10 on: May 15, 2003, 07:59:40 AM »
It would be nice if AH2 planes have historical cockpits and historical engine managment... But I doubt


AH1 version 1.11P4  vs IL2FB version 1.0? Wow!
Thats bit straight forward, eh?


Well, IL2FB can offer lot more plane simulator even todays state than AH1 ever.  

I like them both
Logged

Offline jEEZY

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 259
Forgotten Battles
« Reply #11 on: May 15, 2003, 09:31:53 AM »
Seems to me that the FM in FB is better tthan AH based on my experiance flying planes and gliders.  Albeit the planes I have flown were not 300mph fighters--but the basic sensations and such are the same.  The basic flight characteristics such as landing taking off, coordinated turns, straight and level, seem more realistic in FB--Like I said above, AH feels more like an arcade game, perhaps it has to in order to be a Massive Multiplayer.  

Futhermore, the gunnery in FB is more difficult to master--I think in this area FB beats AH hands down.  In AH it is not unusual for a single plane to down a b-17 on a single pass--this should be the exception not the rule.

jeezy
Logged

Offline Creamo

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5976
      • http://www.fatchicksinpartyhats.com
Forgotten Battles
« Reply #12 on: May 15, 2003, 09:36:00 AM »
AH will never have to worry about IL-2FB. The "Why?" has been pointed out time after time.
Logged

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
Forgotten Battles
« Reply #13 on: May 15, 2003, 09:42:51 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Xjazz
It would be nice if AH2 planes have historical cockpits and historical engine managment... But I doubt


AH1 version 1.11P4  vs IL2FB version 1.0? Wow!
Thats bit straight forward, eh?


Well, IL2FB can offer lot more plane simulator even todays state than AH1 ever.  

I like them both


You mean unreadable cockpit and hysterical engine management ? :D
Logged

Offline Xjazz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
Forgotten Battles
« Reply #14 on: May 15, 2003, 10:03:30 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by straffo
You mean unreadable cockpit and hysterical engine management ? :D


Yeah, that I mean :D

No no, FB kind of cockpits with AH snapview setup system plus native TrackIR support plus terrible hysterical engine managment :p
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 6   Go Up
« previous next »