Author Topic: A Perk Suggestion  (Read 151 times)

Offline LePaul

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7988
A Perk Suggestion
« on: June 19, 2003, 08:52:32 AM »
I think the perks are too high on many of the aircraft perked....Ta 152, Spit 14, etc.   The 262 is fine where it is, the 234...well...lil lower would be cool since bomber perks seem harder to accumulate.

Question:  I understand the perk values going DOWN to the country getting smacked.  I do not see the logic in raising the already high perk prices higher for others.

I started a new account about a month ago and even with my moderate play, have only 80 perks.  Perhaps in early 2004, I can jump into a 262!

Not a whine, cry or threat to leave if it aint my way.  Just wondering why raise em?

If you don't want them in the game, remove them from the available list of aircraft for that arena.

That and the icons for the Perk Planes...who wants to fly for weeks to earn a Spit 14 only to have the giant "HEY IM FLYING A PERK PLANE, COME N GET ME" tag  :p   Why can't it just say SPIT ?

Offline ccvi

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2074
      • http://www.carl-eike-hofmeister.de/
Re: A Perk Suggestion
« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2003, 10:40:57 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by LePaul
Question:  I understand the perk values going DOWN to the country getting smacked.


No, you don't understand ;)

It doesn't depend on getting smacked, just on player numbers.

Leave bishland and you can frequently fly 262s for 100pp.

Offline LePaul

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7988
A Perk Suggestion
« Reply #2 on: June 19, 2003, 11:24:23 AM »
I was most recently Rook and the 262s were consistently mid 200's

Offline ccvi

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2074
      • http://www.carl-eike-hofmeister.de/
A Perk Suggestion
« Reply #3 on: June 19, 2003, 11:41:49 AM »
Must have been RJO or something. Try normal nights, or even better different times than nights ;)

Offline Noctilux

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 44
      • http://www.718tfw.com
quiet already
« Reply #4 on: June 19, 2003, 07:46:59 PM »