Shane is killing countrymen

[Shane]

Originally posted by Eagler
he can do whatever .. kill whoever .. just do it without the noise on ch 1

hey eagler why don't you bitch about the the truly vulgar crap those kids were spewiing. get off my ankle, get on theirs.

yanno, my anger isn't so much at the noobs who do this stuff, altho' they're getting a little transferral when they get all chest puffy when i call 'em on it; it's disgust with the way so called "vets" who don't take the time to teach, nuture, lecture and otherwise club seals into line and get the basics
down... they're giving tacit approval and encouragement to such lameness by both their silence and the faux 's they toss around for what is nothing more than half-azzed skills.

cop outs.

[Jester]

Fellow CT'ers - This thread between Hawk & Shane - does this not remind you of two Circus clowns bashing each other repeatedly over the head with a live Flounder? (shakes head).

Grab you cream pies folks! Soon as the chest thumping, name calling and ankle humping is over the pie fight is on!!!  

[CurtissP-6EHawk]

What we have here is "two wrongs dont make a right".  Everyone knows how shane is.

I guess what is needed here is an opology from me to the rest of the CT family.  I dont know when this mess really started but it does nothing but get worse. My bitterness did start, however, with WarBirdsII. When I was told about Aces High, I decided to try it out. What I discovered was a new game with some of the same players, with the same pros and cons. I started right off 6 months ago, my first night in AH, with guys yelling about not having the N1K2J and the allies having the F4FU. I was use to the yelling so I just joined right in......new sim, same ole BS.  After several months of many frustrations, I began expressing them on voxx both squad ch and country ch.  It got so bad at one time, a CM changed a whole map because I opened my mouth. I thought that was the end of the world.

I have written at least three replys like this, Lowejg knows all three if not more.  I see guys replying to this post whom I dont even recall seeing in the CT. Whats scarry is that they know me and me not knowing them.

Lowejg, let me join your squad, if it falls apart after three months, then I will know its me.

As for the rest of you guys, shane is bad for the CT, he needs to go, as well as myself.

[eskimo2]

Originally posted by CurtissP-6EHawk


As for the rest of you guys, shane is bad for the CT, he needs to go, as well as myself.

You guys just need to pry your / key off of your keyboards and all will be well.

eskimo

[Eagler]

shane

all i saw was you

if they typed some crap - you to proud to ignore it?

instead you incite them into a frenzy to the point of making us squelch one

who appointed you master of the ct universe anyway?

take a chill pill

[Nifty]

when are you guys going to learn that it's best to ignore him when he's on a tirade?

[Furious]

This was a fantasticly stupid and entertaining thread.  Thank you one and all.  

[Shane]

Originally posted by Eagler
shane
all i saw was you
if they typed some crap - you to proud to ignore it?
instead you incite them into a frenzy to the point of making us squelch one
who appointed you master of the ct universe anyway?
take a chill pill

all you saw was me?  you missed all those genitalia fixated comments made by them?  

take off the blinders.  or better yet, squelch me and then take a good look at ch1 sometimes.

someone has to take up the slack that you so-called vets have been failing to. you're (generic) more self-absorbed in your little cocoons, only interested in the next backslapping faux to validate your merely average skills.

i see CT becoming quite lame when you only encourage instead of club lamers like hawk and them little striker snerts. you endorse that lameness. you might not like *how* i say things, but are you telling me in principle you support the total lameness seen? if so, then i truly think your status as "vets" should be downgraded to "clueless adult seals."  total noobs have an excuse... what's yours?

enjoy your little circles... try not to sprain your wrists or chap your lips.

[Shane]

Originally posted by CurtissP-6EHawk
What we have here is "two wrongs dont make a right".  Everyone knows how shane is.
As for the rest of you guys, shane is bad for the CT, he needs to go, as well as myself.

and everyone knows how you are. it's admirable to see squaddies, ex-squaddies and "sister" squaddies sticking up for your lameness.

i'm not bad for the CT, i'm bad for lamers because i call you on it.

how about showing some honest effort for once, hawk *and* the rest of you anklehumpers,  instead of being content to endorse and espouse lameness?

[Eagler]

when I don't recoginize a handle, I'll ignore it, squelch it on 1.
somebody of your experience shouldn't need to be squelched - then again maybe you have a screw loose ...

the setup changes weekly -  I don't worry about it

nobody died and made me "King of CT"

HT is lucky having paying customers like you policing their product for them

are you a CT CM wannabe??

[Shane]

no eagler... i just call them like i see them.  you're content to wear blinders, flying along in your little coccon in your quest for the next faux from other seals.

i wouldn't appraoch being needing squelched if you so called vets weren't dropping the ball in toto in helping noobs and lamers become adequate players.

your silence is a tacit endorsement of what you *know* to be true lame behavior.

step up, take some of the burden off me and help to quiet my haranguing, help these people get good enough, get them to be less lame, and improve the game all around.

if you're not gonna do that, get off my ankle.

[Drunky]

Originally posted by Furious
This was a fantasticly stupid and entertaining thread.  Thank you one and all.  

I vote 5 starts for this thread.  This one is a possible for Thread of the Year.

[eddiek]

And he does have some good tips and advice to offer.

If he would present his views like this:


http://www.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=89407



........all the time instead of running off at the mouth, fewer people would be on his case.

And I know, Shane, you don't care what anyone thinks or says about you, but consider this:

When you spout off and call people names, are you really "improving" anything?  
To a newbie, your behavior might be considered the norm.  Calling players "lamers" whenever they don't play the way you think they should is not teaching them anything but bad manners and poor sportsmanship.
A player of your "skill" could better teach by example, i.e. leading those newbies and showing them tricks and tactics, no?

[Shane]

gentle cajoling never got anywhere.. experience has borne that out.  ignoring it entirely and just tossing out faux 's (something i was never into to begin with - if anything i toss out a simple ) only further encourages and endorses such behavior.

i never see anyone else offering tips, or clubbing down lamers for their truly lame behavior, except for those who try and jump on my back because they don't like how i'm getting my message across - and apparently taking the stance that as long as they get their quota of backslaps nothing else matters.

you're dam right i *do* help out in all sorts of manners, especially in the MA and on some of the boards.  the CT has a fairly small and regular player base, i'd like to see some of *you* step up to the plate.

i do enough of that in the MA, i go to the CT for the historical matchups and some good fights, always optimistic that what fork said about better fights being in the CT migh tbe true. so again, there are enough dedicated CT regulars who should be fulfilling this role somewhat.

don't like what i have to say over ch1? then help the overall situation improve to the point where it's toned down to mere, "lol gangers" or "you gurls are good with alt and nbrs."

let me copy something i wrote in another thread when steve asked about the apparent contradiction u also referred to,  to give you a better idea...

-----------------------
steve's post:

Dang Shane. I've been reading assorted threads and seen some of your posts in them. In a lot of them, slobberdonkeys and dweebs...or you are catagorize people in a negative light based on how they fly... this K/T, that K/S. You have something insulting or at least condescending to say about people in the game in just about every post.
I'm not baggin on ya dude.. it's perplexing and here's why: On the boards you come off as negative, even insulting toward a lot of people. And it seems obvious that anyone who doesn't fly in the way you prescribe to is somehow worthy of nothing but disdain. This and the same type of smack you talk on ch1 would lead most people to think you're somewhat less than a nice person. I sort of thought that... but always respected your MA skilz.
Then we went to the DA and you were this friendly, instructive, helpful, nice guy... you seemed very willing, even eager to help make me a better pilot and in a very positive and informative way. I got so much out of that, and enjoyed myself so much that I look forward to my next lessons. What's the deal there? I mean, it's almost like you put on your "bad guy hat" when you get on the boards or on ch1.

my response:

yeah, steve i guess i'm a complicated person; look closely and you can see an ulterior motive for how i act in the MA. it's pulled quite a few people into the DA with me, and once they put their egos aside, they find there's stuff to be learned. or i find out they've been holding back in MA and deprieving people of an honest battle.

look at it this way... i really don't care how or what anyone flys; all i want to see is an honest effort, not a lame-out. when i don't see that honest effort, well.... you'll hear from me...

and if you really pay attn to the text buffer you'll find 99% of my remarks are generalized and non-specific to a *person* such as ... lol gangers... lol, you gurls are good with nbrs and alt... diediedie HOJoustWeenie (often said before i even know who the weenie was, as one or both of us fall down to earth in flames)... or lol, that was some weak flying (used when i see a name that has been around quite a while and who i know has potential to do better.)

rarely do i get personal, yet you'll see people making personal attacks on me all the time. but if you wanna play that way, don't get all huffy puffy when i slap you down.

no one is ever forced to respond to my generic smacks... no one has to hit if no one responds, you don't see me carrying on and on and on..

those who want to play that particular form of word warrior do so of their own free will and no one else needs to come riding in on their high horse of faux morals/ethos to save a non-existent victim.

as for the BBS... well, let's just say.... the same tools and free will exist here as in the MA. i'm just as helpful on various boards in here and only jump in certain topics when the fancy strikes me to do so, in whatever manner amuses me at the time.



WTFGAS and YMMV yanno?

read drunky's sig some day.  read mine again while i have you here, now.  

oh yeah... i was never into the whole faux thing... i'll toss out a simple smiley or a lol while in MA in place of that faux . DA is a little different, i'll toss out a for at least seeing some honest effort from someone in attempting to learn or having some fun fights.

do a search in o'club for song parodys... check out the spoof i did of eminem's "without me"  

oh yeah, do me a favor, go hump lazs' ankle or something, mine are chaffed from the CT slobberdonkeys.

[Grizzly]

Players pay to have fun in AH and are allowed to do what they wish to have fun. HTC is mainly concerned about arena disruption and vulgarity and lets the community fend for itself beyond that. It's up to the community to set the standards for appropriate behavior within the game and communicate this to the other players in a variety of ways. That's the world of online gaming as I see it... YMMV

The thing that strikes me different about AH more than anything else is that certain types of conduct that are scorned and ridiculed elsewhere are accepted in AH. Milkrunning is one of these. Milkrunning is hard to define, but one thing that is needed to make it undesireable is it having a negative affect on others... porking an HQ certainly would. Another undesireable type of conduct are those who exit or auger to avoid conflict.

To me porking bases and exiting each time someone catches you is something a reasonable gaming community would frown on. It appears to me that Shane applied a little community justice in this case, which I applaud. The lack of character and whiney, crybaby conduct of the one who got his fair share of justice is displayed by his taking it here. This only reinforces the fact that he had it coming. I suggest dweeb hunts and incessant vulching are in order until he learns proper game ettiquette.

On the other hand, if you want a game full of idiots doing stupid things to mess things up for others while avoiding conflict (griefer is the right word for this), then those who oppose Shane here are on the right track. Shane may well get thrown out of AH, but it will always be as lame. Your choice =o/

WTG Shane =o)