Author Topic: plane set on this setup is pitiful  (Read 1251 times)

Offline ramzey

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3223
plane set on this setup is pitiful
« Reply #15 on: July 04, 2003, 07:16:48 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by _Schadenfreude_
Was an excellent week and should be revisited soon for a 1942/43 scenario with 109F's 190A5's Jug's and Spit 5's


if 1942/43 spit should be mk9:)

Offline Squire

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7683
plane set on this setup is pitiful
« Reply #16 on: July 04, 2003, 09:57:00 AM »
I see nothing wrong with a 1941-42 setup with SpitfireVs vs 109Fs and 190A5s. We can also do a Pacific setup with F4U-1s at some point in the Solomons vs Ki-61s. How about we try some historical matchups without the endless "one-upmanship" for once.

Would also be great to do a ETO or N. African 1943 setup with the SpitfireIX and the 109G2 included, lets do that too. How about a "real" ETO Spring 44 setup and leave the late 44 ac out for a change.

Lets do it all.
Warloc
Friday Squad Ops CM Team
1841 Squadron Fleet Air Arm
Aces High since Tour 24

Offline humble

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6434
plane set on this setup is pitiful
« Reply #17 on: July 04, 2003, 10:21:26 PM »
I still don't like the planeset/matchups much at all....but after flying it for a week I'll admit it's a bit better than I thought. One nice advantage to the CT is over time (once your done #$%#) you do learn the set a bit....landed a 7 kill hurricane hop, and a 10 kill 202 hop today....so obviously my original assessment was somewhat hasty and ignorant...you can kill stuff...just need a much more refined approach to gunnery (cept in the P40:)). I promise to wait till Tues before whinning about the next plane set:).

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."-Pres. Thomas Jefferson