Originally posted by Rude
Religion is a product of Mankind....has nothing to do with God.
Jesus himself warned that the religious(Pharisee's and Sadusee's...) were themselves the worst of mankind.
For most, you cannot understand something that you have no knowledge of....you seek to apply the physical to that which is spiritual. You have eye's yet cannot see and ears which do not hear. Pride and self are your God.
Be assured that at some point in your life, God will deal with you and at that time, you will make a choice. Perhaps you already have, or do not understand what I'm speaking of....still, that time will come and when it does, you'll know it.
God loves us all and his desire is to give life and life abundantly through fellowship with him. I have experienced this and know it to be true.
Now, I would be a liar if I left you thinking that I was better than any of you....the truth lies in the following....
"It is by Grace that we are saved, not by works, lest any man should boast."
Hard concept to swallow I admit....still the truth remains regardless of the opinion of mankind.
BTW MT....science is merely mankinds effort to define the undefinable.
So, let me get this straight. Your belief in God and your statements about his attributes of love and his desires are not "religion"? Sorry sir, but I find that statement hypocritcal. I'll grant you that God is above religion: he/she/it is what he/she/it is and nothing humans spout can change that. But once you begin to attribute any quality to God, i.e. that he "deals with humans, you are defining religious belief, or, in other words, espousing a religion. I am happy that you have your God. He may even be the same as my God. Your God may even be THE GOD. I am sure you think he is. But, chances are, there are a few billion humans who don't share your view. Now, you say that human opinion is irrelevant. If that were true, why would God "deal" with humans.
And Rude, respectfully sir, I cannot agree with your theory that science is the effort to define that which is undefinable. That we cannot currenlty define something does not mean that it is undefineable, only that humans are currently lack the knowledge to define it, i.e. people used to think aerial flight was magic. We know it is not. Science is the effort to understand the parameters of our existence.
And a question about Grace. If it is solely by the Grace of God, and not our works that humans are saved, and it may well be, then how does one acquire the Grace of God, or how is the Grace of God distributed, if not by the works we perfom. Again, I sense hypocricy there. You see, I think that someone who does good all his or her life, has a better chance at salvation, or at obtaining the Grace of God, than does say, someone like Jeffrey Dahmer, or Adolph Hitler.
Geez, I'm regressing back to collegiate nights of wine infected mullings about the meaning of existence, etc etc. I better stop. It hurts! Sorry.