LMAO! Just as I was reading this thread, WinAMP started playing Amazing Grace on bagpipes!
After reading all the threads on this subject, I gotta agree that iEN and MildJill are destined for the scrap-yard. They can't sue just the USAF and Dale for using latency-reducing code, cause they'd have to sue everybody who writes/produces/owns a net-based game. That'd be claiming to own the whole latency-reducing idea, and would make a monopoly, which is illegal. Also, Dale OWNS the patent (as of 2k, the document date), so they can't sue on the grounds he's using/selling/charging for it. All this amounts to a temper tantrum by iEN because MildJill can't manage a company; something half the planet has known for years.
-hazed, I'm with you. I'd sign a petition towards HTC's credibility, customer service quality, the works. They don't spew any BS, they're all active on the board when time permits, and every one of 'em will answer a question both on the boards and the phone. As for counter-suing iEN/MildJill to pay for damages....eh, I wouldn't. That'd be like winning five years of free telemarketing calls. All you could really counter-sue for is worthless stock or court costs; the latter being the best route. Though the judge would probably want payment in cash based on iEN's inability to pay bills. Hell, I'll bet $5 the reason HTC sent the licensing check back is cause it would've bounced.
-----------------------
Flakbait [Delta6]
Delta Six's Flight SchoolPut the P-61B in Aces High