Author Topic: Heil Intolerance (Read 12443 times)

Octavius · « **Reply #30 on:** July 31, 2003, 12:04:40 PM »

intolerant of intolerance?

Ripsnort · « **Reply #31 on:** July 31, 2003, 12:07:09 PM »

I'm a lesbian.

midnight Target · « **Reply #32 on:** July 31, 2003, 12:08:08 PM »

Homophobes are funny.

Do you realy think your kids are gonna be "recruited" or something? Could you have been convinced that you didn't like girls when you were a teenager? LOL

Hortlund · « **Reply #33 on:** July 31, 2003, 12:09:28 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by midnight Target
Yea, those kids are MUCH better off in a foster home, or an orphanage. Who cares if someone is willing to love and raise them...

What you fail to take into consideration is that most giver nations (i e nations people from Europe or US go to to find children to adopt) have a ban on adopting to same sex parents. So those children will not benefit. At the same time, there are 50 couples on each domestic adoptive child (i e a Swedish child, or a US child) and we both agree that it is best for the children to be adopted by "real" parents.

midnight Target · « **Reply #34 on:** July 31, 2003, 12:13:56 PM »

There are over 400,000 "at risk" or older children in need of adoptive parents in the US alone. Limiting their chances of having a loving home is STUPID.

I'm not talking about the newborn white babies with a string of applicants a mile long for each one.

capt. apathy · « **Reply #35 on:** July 31, 2003, 12:15:01 PM »

Quote

PS to Apathy...While your benevolent act of not kicking homosexual's tulips and not inconveniencing yourself by leaving a resturaunt if they're your waiter is truly noble, it does not make you tolerant.

ok, we also don't lock people up for homosexual acts. we generally make an effort to treat gays the same as we would anyone else. when I work with someone who happens to let it be known he's gay it makes no difference in how I treat him or if I'm friendly or not. we don't single them out for any special negitave behavior, that is tolarance.

if you want congratulations on a new boyfriend you've come to the wrong place. I don't aprove, I wont pretend that I aprove. I wont go out of my way to bring it up, but if you want to bring up the subject I'll speak my mind.

but to many people mariage is a sacred thing (most who don't treatit as such don't stay married for long), we don't allow marriages for political convenience (imigration purposes, it happens but is not legal), we don't allow people to marry animals, and we don't allow people of the same sex to marry each other. it cheapens the institution and is an ofront to many married people.

there are others who's behavior I don't aprove. adulterers, I have many people I work with who freely screw around on their wives while out of town. they say they have feelings (horneyness being the main one) and they use thisto justify their acts. how is this different? I'm tolorant of them too. I don't aprove of their behavior but I tolorate it. I do my best not to treat them any different because it's none of my business, much like the gay situation.

but if they wanted to start effecting the curiculem in my childrens schools to reflect that adulterous behavior is ok, they'd face the same resistance from me that gays do.

maybe the adulterers would want a law that allowed for temporary 'mini marriages' for when they are out of town, legaly recognised and all. that way if the girl you are shacking up with while away from your family gets sick you could put her on the company health plan and drive the rates up further for the rest of us.

capt. apathy · « **Reply #36 on:** July 31, 2003, 12:18:17 PM »

accidental double post

Hortlund · « **Reply #37 on:** July 31, 2003, 12:18:28 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by midnight Target
There are over 400,000 "at risk" or older children in need of adoptive parents in the US alone. Limiting their chances of having a loving home is STUPID.

I'm not talking about the newborn white babies with a string of applicants a mile long for each one.

Well, HELLO who do you think it is the homos want to adopt?

And COME ON are you seriously saying that we should take some 6 yr old kid and hand him over to a homo couple? "Here is dad and dad...good luck kid" ..eh..I dont think so.

Octavius · « **Reply #38 on:** July 31, 2003, 12:20:32 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by capt. apathy
but to many people mariage is a sacred thing (most who don't treatit as such don't stay married for long), we don't allow marriages for political convenience (imigration purposes, it happens but is not legal), we don't allow people to marry animals, and we don't allow people of the same sex to marry each other. it cheapens the institution and is an ofront to many married people.

It's a piece of paper and a ring! For some, it may be a financially good idea.

And sacred to what? Christianity? hmm, Hindu's can be married right? What about Islam? Sacredness is relative.

Lance · « **Reply #39 on:** July 31, 2003, 12:24:20 PM »

Lol, I think this thread needs a link to the nullo story.

takeda · « **Reply #40 on:** July 31, 2003, 12:25:46 PM »

Better give the kid to a decent person who might be an "homo" than to anyone in this bunch of moral cavemen that would grow him as mentally crippled as they are.
Mm'kay, so if kids are that malleable, shouldn't heterosexual couples start making out in front of their kids to make sure they get right what goes into where?

capt. apathy · « **Reply #41 on:** July 31, 2003, 12:26:31 PM »

Quote

It's a piece of paper and a ring! For some, it may be a financially good idea

Quote

to many people mariage is a sacred thing (most who don't treat it as such don't stay married for long)

do the courts and your future ex-wife a favor. if you don't find it sacred don't do it.

DiabloTX · « **Reply #42 on:** July 31, 2003, 12:29:30 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Octavius
Sacredness is relative.

Hehehe, yeah, especially in them inbred southern states!!

_Schadenfreude_ · « **Reply #43 on:** July 31, 2003, 12:32:38 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Saurdaukar
As a heterosexual, I am grossly offended by their decision to fornicate with members of the same sex.

Reparations may be in order.

even good looking female members.....who ask you to join them?

Rude · « **Reply #44 on:** July 31, 2003, 12:36:14 PM »

Ok...here I go...I know you guys wanna know what I think.

I love them as God loves me....it's their lifestyle and the sin which I'm against.

Anyone who thinks that homosexuality is normal and should be accepted as such, leaves me wondering what on earth justifies that belief.

Gays need help, not encouragement to continue to ruin their lives further.

I think the difference is I believe Gods word and base my morality by the same...some of you are your own Gods making up your own morality.

Mans nature is corrupt, including my own.