Damage display

[2Hawks]

Originally posted by Rutilant
It's BS for..

#1, it's funny (i'll have to explain this scientifically later ))


#2, it's basically.. "If you agree, you'll get AH2 faster.. You DO want AH2 faster.. don't you?" ..so a bribe of sorts

<--

I am all for a scientific explanation, private msg me if you feel you have the time, I am really curious.

And the "Bribe" issue was discussed above. Read the posts oh yon of scientific pay attention to detail read everything wonder shmackle.

[hitech]

Not posting any opinon on the damage display, but it would take more time to take it out than leave it in.


HiTech

[Rutilant]

Hi Hitech...





Booyah 2Hawks..

[2Hawks]

Originally posted by Rutilant
Hi Hitech...





Booyah 2Hawks..

Thank You.

Your congratulations are Accepted.

Nice to hear from the master of the realm. {S} Hitech.

[Awulf]

*sheesh*

Just when I was about to post an inane reply Hitech has to pop in and settle everything with one sentence

[BNM]

Originally posted by 2Hawks
wouldn't you rather see the damage list go away in favor of a quicker AHII?

No.

[Rutilant]

Huhwha?

Originally posted by 2Hawks
*Grin*

supposing that a re-write was being done, which in some portions there more than likely is, then leaving out some code could theoretically produce a faster turnout for AHII.

In my Experience, when a program gets to a certain size, things must be written from scratch using the new tech and methods learned in making previous updates. But this is just me, I am obsessive compulsive in wanting my code perfect. It's probably that reason I am a webmaster and not a full time programmer.

Supposing that the code has to be removed and is not being converted to a different language then yes you are right it would take more time.
 

THen hitech said..

"Not posting any opinon on the damage display, but it would take more time to take it out than leave it in.


HiTech"


Hmm.. you darn double standarding person you!