Author Topic: Death penalty advocates need not read.  (Read 569 times)

Offline gofaster

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6622
Death penalty advocates need not read.
« on: August 12, 2003, 02:35:43 PM »
After all, if the criminal justice system is good enough to convict people for capital offenses and send them to the chair, and no innocent people are executed, then this exhibit is a bunch of bunk.

For the rest, this sounds like a worthwhile exhibition to attend.

=====From Yahoo News=========

'The Innocents' exonerated by photography that once betrayed them
By Emanuella Grinberg, Court TV

NEW YORK — William Gregory can't help gushing over the photo of him hanging at the P.S. 1 art gallery in Queens, in spite of what it signifies.

   

"It exudes so much," he says, describing the sullen portrait of him sitting on the edge of a pool table in a dark bar, wrapped in his fiance's embrace. "I can see the pain and anguish in my face, the intenseness of what they did to this individual."


"They" — the criminal justice system — arrested Gregory, charged him with rape, attempted rape and two counts of burglary and convicted him, despite the alibi testimony of the woman who holds him in his portrait. He then spent seven years in the Northpoint Training Center in Fayette County, Kentucky until 2000, when he become the state's first inmate to be exonerated through DNA evidence. His release was won through the help of defense lawyer Barry Scheck of the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law's Innocence Project.


The photo is one of 45 portraits photographer Taryn Simon took for the book, "The Innocents", of wrongfully-convicted men (and one woman) exonerated through DNA evidence. A selection of the portraits will travel across the country to different galleries, a composite image of the realities faced by the men and women who have been exonerated through the Innocence Project's work over the past decade.


The book and the exhibition mark the tenth anniversary of the Innocence Project, a non-profit legal aid clinic that has applied DNA evidence to help exonerate 132 men and women across the United States. It also kicks off the Innocence Project's newest initiative, the Life After Exoneration Project, a program that will help make the transition from prison to life on the outside smoother for exonerees. "The story of their lives since they've been released is another part of the story," says Aliza Kaplan, deputy director and one of the staff attorneys for the Innocence Project. "By reaching out through art, we're telling those stories to an audience that might not necessarily read them in the newspapers."


Gregory's picture hangs with 14 other life-sized blow-ups capturing the subjects in various settings relevant to their convictions. Some stand at the scenes of their alleged crimes or failed alibi locations. The pool table Gregory sits on speaks to the pool champion he became while in prison for seven years. Ron Williamson, who was drafted by the Oakland A's before serving 11 years on death row for first-degree murder, poses on a baseball field.


For each of these men, freedom is bittersweet as they struggle to find their place back in society. Since his release, Gregory has set his sights on creating the William T. Gregory Foundation to help others adjust to being exonerated, but such plans have been stalled as he struggles to make his way back up a ladder he fell off almost 10 years ago. He won't discuss the details of his lawsuit seeking damages, "for what they done to me," except to say that if it is successful, those earnings could help him get started.


"I was doing well for myself, I had awards, I was meeting my goals — I know because I'd write 'em down — I was a high achiever," he says, on the phone from rural Kentucky, near the Ford plant outside of Louisville. "You'd think it would be easy to get that back, but it's not."


In prison, the mortal fear he developed has made Gregory a creature of habit, so much so that he locks doors behind him whenever he leaves or enters a room, and always checks the backseat when getting into his car. "When you go in on a sexual charge, you gotta be watching your back. The guys in there say, 'that coulda been my wife, or my daughter.' They respect murderers and thieves, but they can't respect baby-rapists or tree jumpers. After watching your back for eight years, you get a lot of baggage, and I got it."


He compares his situation to that of a solider returning from combat. Except, he says, "at least the government has a deprogramming situation for them, 30 days or something before they put you back into society, but we don't have no deprogramming situations because this is brand-spanking new. There's only 130 of us, but there should be thousands more."


A New York Times freelance photographer, 28-year-old Taryn Simon first met Gregory in the summer of 2000 while on a similar shoot for the Times Magazine about men exonerated through DNA evidence. Awed by their stories, particularly the misconceptions the public tended to hold of what life is like for wrongfully-convicted persons once they are freed, Simon applied for a John Guggenheim grant to photograph more of them and received it.


She then approached The Innocence Project's founders Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld with her idea. A friend of Scheck's, Nan Gregory of Umbrage Books, convinced the two to support the idea of a photo journal and traveling exhibit to publicize their efforts to free innocent men and expose the criminal justice system, warts and all — using the men's own words and images.


"This isn't just a publishing campaign, it's more like an outreach program," says Gregory. "There's no turning away from the real-life story of someone who's been there and proved to not have done it and spent 15 to 20 years of his life in jail for it; it's a powerful indictment of what we're not doing right."


The foreword in The Innocents, as well as the curatorial note introducing the gallery exhibit, describes the photographic mission. "In the cases presented, photography offered the justice system a tool that assisted officers in obtaining erroneous eyewitness identifications, aided prosecutors in securing convictions and transformed innocent citizens into criminals." Most wrongful convictions, it says, stem from mistaken eyewitness identifications: "through exposure to composite sketches, mug shots, polaroids and lineups, eyewitness memory can change."


And so, the images in both the exhibit and the book are accompanied by either a caption or a page of text from Simon's interviews with each subject. "I tried to load the photo with as much history and context as possible to confront the viewer with the accusation that was placed upon the people," she says. "It was important to me, because photography had been used in a negligent way to secure their convictions, to be very careful about context in this go-around using photography."


Simon traveled across the United States for six months shooting her subjects, often facing their reticence to return to the sites of the crimes they were accused and convicted of, or the location of the alibis juries didn't believe. One man told her he didn't want to fail a polygraph test if ever asked if he was familiar with the crime scene. But in each circumstance, she says, "I took them back to those sites to present this bizarre relationship between truth and fiction, which demonstrated (that while) the public wants to think this is the sort of thing they can get beyond once they're exonerated and freed from all these associations, it's not. They have to deal with a skeptical public; these accusations will be with them forever."


And if the photos make the viewer uneasy, all the better, she says. "I kept a distance to create a degree of discomfort, which is that you and I can try and empathize, but we will never understand what it's like to go through something like that. I didn't want to embrace the emotional side because it's something neither I nor a photo can access."

   
As for Mr. Gregory, he came out of jail with a goal — to help aid future exonerees in their transition. With the release of this book and the exhibit opening, he is hopeful that may finally happen. "To see my photo and learn about what happened to me helps a lot of other people in prison," he says.

"I don't want to be remembered, I just want to help. I want to encourage people not to give up. I almost did, about five or six times."

Offline Lance

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1316
Death penalty advocates need not read.
« Reply #1 on: August 12, 2003, 03:25:00 PM »
I wonder if they got around to photographing this guy.  I remember reading about what happened to him when it first hit the papers here.  Sort of stuck with me since then.

Quote

In 1988, a young woman was opening the Pizza Hut she managed in Austin, Texas, when she was tied up, raped, and shot in the head. Money was stolen. Richard Danziger and Chris Ochoa, roommates at the time, worked at a nearby Pizza Hut. They became the focus of the police investigation into the murder and were picked up by police and questioned separately. Following three days of interrogation Ochoa falsely confessed that he and Danziger committed the rape and murder. Ochoa ultimately pled guilty, taking full responsibility for the shooting, and testified against Danziger at a 1990 trial. Danziger maintained his innocence. He testified that he was with his girlfriend at the time of the murder, but prosecutors claimed that a pubic hair found at the scene belonged to him. Though the semen evidence could not be matched to Danziger, Ochoa could not be excluded. Eight years later, Achim Marino, who was serving three life sentences in a Texas prison, confessed to the crime. He sent letters with detailed knowledge of the crime to then-Governor Bush, the police, the newspaper, and the district attorney. His letters went unanswered for two years even though police found items he had described. After a letter from Marino was made public, Ochoa and Danziger were able to get DNA tests, which excluded them and incriminated Marino. In 2001, Danziger and Ochoa were officially exonerated. By then, Danziger had been attacked in prison by inmates, kicked in the head, and sustained serious brain damage.

Written statement by Richard Danzinger's sister and legal guardian, Barbara:


"On February 27th, 1991, Richard's worst fears came true. Another inmate beat the back of Richard's skull into his brain. For many weeks, our family believed he would die. During this time we watched Richard lie unconscious and handcuffed to his bed. Due to this injury, Richard now suffers from seizures, mental problems, and partial paralysis of the left side of his body. ... Now, at 32, released from prison, his care has been transferred from the prison system to family members. Richard still has someone making his appointments, taking him to the doctor, making sure he takes his medications, pays his bills. The only difference from being in jail is that now he has people who care about his well being. ... My question to you is where is the justice? If released from prison on parole, you have programs to assist you, find a job, help you find a place to live, groups to help you readjust. With the help of DNA, once you are released, you are on your own. No probation officer, no peer groups, no job assistance, no education, no history or references for job applications. In some cases, no family or friends left to help. Yet, society demands you participate and make something of yourself. ... So which is better: a place where you eat three meals a day, shower, sleep, make no decisions; or the unknown named freedom? Will Richard ever have freedom or has the justice system robbed him of that opportunity forever?"

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Death penalty advocates need not read.
« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2003, 03:33:58 PM »
Just a comment...if DNA evidence is really that good for conviction, then its all the more reason to support the Death Penalty if based on DNA evidence.

Offline gofaster

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6622
Death penalty advocates need not read.
« Reply #3 on: August 12, 2003, 03:40:11 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Lance
I wonder if they got around to photographing this guy.  I remember reading about what happened to him when it first hit the papers here.  Sort of stuck with me since then.


I remember when "Dateline" or one of the other shows did a full story on that case a few years back.  I can't remember how it ended.  I had almost forgotten about the case.  Thanks for posting up the details.

Offline gofaster

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6622
Death penalty advocates need not read.
« Reply #4 on: August 12, 2003, 03:41:48 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
Just a comment...if DNA evidence is really that good for conviction, then its all the more reason to support the Death Penalty if based on DNA evidence.


Hey, I told you up front, death penalty advocates need not read!  :p

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Death penalty advocates need not read.
« Reply #5 on: August 12, 2003, 03:55:44 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by gofaster
Hey, I told you up front, death penalty advocates need not read!  :p


Well if you wanted a one-opinion thread, you should have said so! ;)

Offline Wanker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4030
Death penalty advocates need not read.
« Reply #6 on: August 12, 2003, 03:58:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
Just a comment...if DNA evidence is really that good for conviction, then its all the more reason to support the Death Penalty if based on DNA evidence.


Amen, brother! :)

If convicted with DNA evidence, let'em fry! The sooner the better.

Offline BEVO

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 304
Death penalty advocates need not read.
« Reply #7 on: August 12, 2003, 04:36:11 PM »
well, I wasn't a death penalty advocate untill I read this...... now I am.

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Death penalty advocates need not read.
« Reply #8 on: August 12, 2003, 04:37:51 PM »
Death is a bad thing.

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
Death penalty advocates need not read.
« Reply #9 on: August 12, 2003, 04:54:44 PM »
Barry Scheck is one of the lawyers that "proved" OJ was innocent.

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Death penalty advocates need not read.
« Reply #10 on: August 12, 2003, 04:56:27 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by john9001
Barry Scheck is one of the lawyers that "proved" OJ was innocent.


I bet that if you needed a good lawyer and could afford him, you'd hire him.

Offline mietla

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2276
Death penalty advocates need not read.
« Reply #11 on: August 12, 2003, 06:40:55 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
Death is a bad thing.


Why would you say that? It is patently false.

Offline Tarmac

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3988
Death penalty advocates need not read.
« Reply #12 on: August 12, 2003, 07:22:47 PM »
As long as we're talking about wrongly convicted inmates:

http://www.innocenceproject.org/

Offline BEVO

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 304
Death penalty advocates need not read.
« Reply #13 on: August 13, 2003, 09:38:16 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Tarmac
As long as we're talking about wrongly convicted inmates:

http://www.innocenceproject.org/


or FREE THE WEST MEMPHIS THREE

Offline SLO

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2548
Death penalty advocates need not read.
« Reply #14 on: August 13, 2003, 10:38:38 AM »
criminal profilers all said OJ did do it......

you don't run when your innocent......you run when your guilty

he got off not BECAUSE he had good lawyers.....everyone knows it was because no1 wanted a riot......

wanna talk DNA......1 outta 100million said the DNA expert....OJ was guilty....the lawyers worked the 'MISTAKES' of the PD Dept.....they never proved that OJ didn't do it...they didn't have too.