Author Topic: Fuel Consumption Charts - US Engines  (Read 8992 times)

Offline joeblogs

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 649
Fuel Consumption Charts - US Engines
« on: September 22, 2003, 12:29:01 PM »
Here are some charts on specific fuel consumption (lbs fuel burned per horsepower per hour) for a variety of US piston engines.
 
The first example is for the Wright Cyclone 9 model (704C9GC), based on a performance curve published by the manufacturer in February of 1941.  This is a good benchmark for thinking about fuel economy of any large displacement, gasoline powered piston engines of the era.
 


The curves

Two SFC curves are plotted, one for each blower setting (this chart is based on an engine equipped with a single stage, two speed supercharger). That is because the energy required to operate the supercharger subtracts from gross horsepower available to the propeller. The higher blower ratio requires more power because it is spinning the impeller more rapidly.

SFC is measured in lbs. of fuel per horsepower per hour. As is typical for most American performance data, the chart is calculated on the basis of the standardized atmosphere. Corrections must be made for atypical humidity or temperatures.

SFC is lowest (around 0.46) in the low blower setting at about 60 percent of rated power (1,000 HP). The highest SFC in the low blower setting occurs at take-off power (2500 RPM and 45.5 inches Hg MAP, developing 1,200 HP), where it is 0.72. It seems like there is some leaning out of the fuel mixture at take-off power, but I could not find any record of an ADI system installed on this engine.

The minimum SFC in the high blower setting is about 0.53 and it would exceed 0.80 at 90 percent of rated power.

Detail of this engine:

This engine used to derive these charts has a compression ratio of 6.7:1 and is rated at 1,000 HP with 91 octane fuel. The engine is fitted with either a Bendix Stromberg injection or Holley carburetor.

The specs for this engine are an exact match for the R1820-59 version of the cyclone. This is one example of the abundant G200 series, which featured forged cylinder heads and crankcases. This series went into production in March of 1939 and over 20,000 were built by the end of the war. The turbocharged version of this engine (the G205) appeared on the B-17C through B-17G. With turbocharging, the SFC curves at altitude should be somewhat lower than reported here (a page on this is forthcoming).

Sources:

Operation and Service Manual, Wright Cyclone 9 Series C9GA, C9GB, C9GC (1943)

http://www.enginehistory.org

USAF, Air Material Command, Model Designations of USAF Aircraft Engines (January 1, 1950)

Specific Engine Flight Chart, B-17F (R-1820-97 engines), undated
« Last Edit: September 23, 2003, 01:50:28 PM by joeblogs »

Offline joeblogs

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 649
Specific Fuel Consumption for the Double Wasp
« Reply #1 on: September 22, 2003, 12:33:12 PM »
This chart is a good illustration of the effects of power settings and supercharging on the fuel consumption of 1940s vintage, high output radial engines. This chart is derived from a Specific Engine Flight Charts (SEFC) for the F4u-1 Corsair. This curve is unlikely to be identical to the actual performance curve for these engines published by Pratt and Whitney (which I don’t have). But I am pretty sure the qualitative properties shown in my chart would also appear in the official ones.



What are these curves?

The chart plots the Specific Fuel Consumption (SFC) curves for each supercharger setting (neutral, low and high) on the F4u-1. SFC is measured in American units – lbs of fuel per horsepower per hour.

A general feature of the curves is that they rise with horsepower until WEP is engaged (always the last point of the curve). That occurs because water substitutes for fuel to cool the charge, so the mixture is automatically leaned out when using WEP. Also note that SFC tends to be higher when the supercharger is used and when the supercharger is set to the high blower.

The best SFC for this engine is about 0.44 at about 50 percent of rated power and with the blower set to neutral. Military power generates an SFC that is nearly twice as high.

The SFC associated with the low blower ratio is nearly 10 percentage points higher than the comparable point of the neutral blower curve until military power is reached, where the difference is only about 4 percentage points. The best efficiency is attained at about 50 percent of rated power.

The SFC for the high blower setting is usually, but not always, higher than that for the low blower setting. The exception occurs at about 50 percent of rated power where SFC at the high blower setting is actually lower.

The Double Wasp is also the power plant for the P-47. The engine in that installation (R2800-21) has only a single speed geared supercharger and a General Electric turbosupercharger. If we drew a specific fuel consumption curve for the P-47 (again from a SEFC chart), we’d find that it is nearly identical to the curve drawn here for the neutral blower setting.

Background on the Double Wasp

Development of the Double Wasp began in March of 1937 and the first models were being produced in 1940. In the F4u, the -8 and -8W engine had a two stage, two speed supercharger with an intercooler. It was a B series engines with cast aluminum heads. The compression ratio was 6.65:1.

The -21 model used in the P-47 is also a B series engine. It has identical performance characteristics to the -59 and -63 models that appeared on Thunderbolts until a C series engine was introduced on the P-47N.

Construction of the chart

As noted above, this chart is derived from Specific Engine Flight Charts (SEFC) for the F4u-1 and P-47. Both charts are for engines rate for 100/130 pn fuel.

For the -8 model (F4u-1), each curve is a collection of observations at different power settings at roughly the same critical altitude. The neutral blower curve uses power settings at critical altitudes of 7,000 feet or lower. The low blower curve uses power settings at critical altitudes of 15,000 - 20,000 feet. The high blower curve uses power settings at critical altitudes of 20,000-25,000 feet. For each curve, except for WEP (which is always lower) the critical altitudes selected are very close to each other. The curve plotted for the -21 model (P-47) is less sensitive to altitudes below the critical altitude of the turbosupercharger.

This is not exactly the approach used to draw the SFC curve for an engine independent of the plane it is installed in. The engine maker is free to test all sorts of settings, holding ambient air pressure constant. Friction losses from the induction system, or inadequate cooling of the cylinders in a cowled engine would not enter into those measurements. I must pick from a few settings at various altitudes for a particular engine installation (the Corsair).

Sources:

U.S. Navy, Specific Engine Flight Charts (SEFC) for the F4u-1 and P-47 (undated)

Graham White, Allied Aircraft Piston Engines of World War II

http://www.enginehistory.org
« Last Edit: September 22, 2003, 11:00:57 PM by joeblogs »

Offline joeblogs

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 649
Specific Fuel Consumption - Turbocharged Engines
« Reply #2 on: September 22, 2003, 12:35:07 PM »
This chart plots SFC charts for three radial and one liquid cooled engines: The Pratt & Whitney R-2800-21 Double Wasp used on the P-47 Thunderbolt; the Wright R-1820-97 Cyclone used on the B-17F Flying Fortress; the Pratt & Whitney R-1830-43 and -65 Twin Wasps used on the B-24 Liberator; and the Allison V-1710-111 and -113 engines used on the P-38 Lightning.



These curves are not the actual performance curves published by the engine manufacturers. Instead, they are constructed from data contained in Specific Engine Flight Charts (SEFC) for particular aircraft, which assume 100 octane or 100/130 pn fuel.

The fuel economy of these engines, equipped with turbosuperchargers compares favorably to models with two speed geared superchargers (see the page on the R-2800).  

Sources:

Specific Engine Flight Charts for P-38L, P-47, and B-17F (undated)

Pilot's Training Manual for the B-24 Liberater, revised 1 May 1945

Pilot’s Flight Operating Instructions for the P-38H Series, P-38J series, P-38L-1 series, L-5 and F5-B Airplanes (undated)
« Last Edit: September 22, 2003, 11:01:13 PM by joeblogs »

Offline HoHun

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2182
Re: Specific Fuel Consumption - Turbocharged Engines
« Reply #3 on: September 22, 2003, 01:39:47 PM »
Hi Joe,

Highly interesting comparison!

One small thing: The curves would be more accurate with the generic curve smoothing switched off.

Data for a German engine:

Jumo 213A-1

Low gear, altitude 0 m:

g/PSh - PS
202 - 800
202 - 1080
210 - 1340
248 - 1700
268 - 1900

High gear, varying altitude:

g/PSh - PS
214 - 760
216 - 1000
220 - 1260
252 - 1570
300 - 1700
221* - 2140*

* with MW50 injection

Regards,

Henning (HoHun)

Offline joeblogs

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 649
Re: Re: Specific Fuel Consumption - Turbocharged Engines
« Reply #4 on: September 22, 2003, 02:52:44 PM »
Thanks - German and Russian engines are next on my list.

-Blogs

Quote
Originally posted by HoHun
Hi Joe,

Highly interesting comparison!

One small thing: The curves would be more accurate with the generic curve smoothing switched off.

Data for a German engine:

Jumo 213A-1

Low gear, altitude 0 m:

g/PSh - PS
202 - 800
202 - 1080
210 - 1340
248 - 1700
268 - 1900

High gear, varying altitude:

g/PSh - PS
214 - 760
216 - 1000
220 - 1260
252 - 1570
300 - 1700
221* - 2140*

* with MW50 injection

Regards,

Henning (HoHun)