I wasnt aware I was being "defensive".
I was explaining how it "is". Theres no need to bring up the F4u thing until theres a clear set up or idea expressed. So far I havent read anything that would even have the f4u included.
Alutians, Panama, Hollywood etc....... How do you see f4us there?
If you think theres an "opportunity" to change the minds of the so called "anti-f4us" guys (which is only Brady and I) that aint gonna happen. We are as constant as the tide....
If whatever comes out of this group isnt something a particular cm wont run then just move on to another. Because 1 wont run it that doesnt mean all the work gone into it is wasted as there are a number of other CMs.
I dont think the "f4u" issue needs to be discussed at all. Its old ground. Thats not gonna prevent me from helping in research, maps, skins etc... Those are seperate issues all together.
If you wanna test accellerations and speed etc of each plane go for it, but its been done. Look for whels speed tests and Forks accelleration tests. Lethality has been covered several times and Jazz is currently doing it again.
What I think is fun is having a few folks researching and sharing stuff. I not much on pac stuff but I like learning new things.
The players will always challenge the set ups. Everyone always thinks they know more then the guy who set it up.
I didnt offer to help so I can keep the "f4us out from the inside". I suggested this type of approach because I thought it would be fun.
I am having fun already......