Author Topic: whats on for tomorrow  (Read 404 times)

Offline keyapaha

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 561
whats on for tomorrow
« on: October 02, 2003, 09:53:21 AM »
just wondering



   I would like to see the Kurial Is Aug 1945 Japan vs Rus/USN


   Japan plane set
   
   a6m2/5 off 1 CV only
   Ki61
   N1K2-J
   La5FN (skinned as Ki84)

   No GV's No bombers

   Russian plane set

   La 7
   Yak9T/U
 
   USN plane set
 
   F4U 4 off 1 cv only
 
   No GV's No bombers

   No field capture

   Base/Ship ack turned to minium leathality no mannable ack on land and boats.


 Just a good ole fashioned dog fight arena


 any way just a thought

Offline eddiek

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1437
Stay tuned..........
« Reply #1 on: October 02, 2003, 10:12:15 AM »
Am still waiting on more feedback in the CT Staff forum on my proposed planeset.
Actually, the planeset is pretty much decided,  I am just trying to figure out the best terrain to run.

Offline thrila

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3190
      • The Few Squadron
whats on for tomorrow
« Reply #2 on: October 02, 2003, 12:12:02 PM »
So

a6m's, ki61, n1k2 and la5

v

la7, yak 9T/U, f4u4


Am i the only one who sees that as grosely one sided?  No offense keyapha but i can't imagine why anyone would want to fly for axis.
« Last Edit: October 02, 2003, 12:14:46 PM by thrila »
"Willy's gone and made another,
Something like it's elder brother-
Wing tips rounded, spinner's bigger.
Unbraced tailplane ends it's figure.
One-O-nine F is it's name-
F is for futile, not for fame."

Offline Dennis

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 390
whats on for tomorrow
« Reply #3 on: October 02, 2003, 02:20:25 PM »
I would.
What's grossly one-sided about it?

Splash1

Offline scJazz

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 339
whats on for tomorrow
« Reply #4 on: October 04, 2003, 09:48:21 AM »
Actually that sounds like it could be a fun plane set. IJN/IJAF owns the skies down low Allies own it up high. Pretty much normal. I'd like to see the Carrier based strike aircraft like the TBMs and D3As. Carriers never went to sea without such aircraft onboard, leaving them out seems odd.

Perhaps a reskinned 190F8 would be a better match for the KI84. I'm not posting from home but I seem to recall at 2 MG 2 cannon setup on the 84 and speed is damn well near equal.

Offline keyapaha

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 561
whats on for tomorrow
« Reply #5 on: October 04, 2003, 10:54:55 AM »
thought about the f8 also but the la5 manuverablty is more close to ki84 than the f8

 with no field capture whats the use of strike a/c