Aces High Bulletin Board

Help and Support Forums => Aces High Bug Reports => Topic started by: ccvi on September 12, 2018, 03:30:45 PM

Title: Ju88 change - bug or feature
Post by: ccvi on September 12, 2018, 03:30:45 PM: I remember some information that there were no changes to flight models, bombs etc. between AH2 and Ah3. This isn't exactly a difference of that, but one that impacts it. Was it intentional, or is it a bug? See attachment.

(https://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=394567.0;attach=30787)
Title: Re: Ju88 change - bug or feature
Post by: 1stpar3 on September 12, 2018, 06:05:50 PM: :uhoh Formation spread?
Title: Re: Ju88 change - bug or feature
Post by: ccvi on September 12, 2018, 06:14:35 PM: Quote from: 1stpar3 on September 12, 2018, 06:05:50 PM
:uhoh Formation spread?

Increased quite significantly.
Title: Re: Ju88 change - bug or feature
Post by: 1stpar3 on September 14, 2018, 12:57:15 AM: Quote from: ccvi on September 12, 2018, 06:14:35 PM
Increased quite significantly.
To me, it looked like the AH2 set was a bit smaller in wing span? Either way...could explain the BETTER/success in 1 pass WF in AH3? :headscratch:
Title: Re: Ju88 change - bug or feature
Post by: ccvi on September 14, 2018, 02:49:00 PM: Quote from: 1stpar3 on September 14, 2018, 12:57:15 AM
To me, it looked like the AH2 set was a bit smaller in wing span? Either way...could explain the BETTER/success in 1 pass WF in AH3? :headscratch:

I tried to rescale both screenshots as close as I could get (think its off by 1 pixel). Yes, town-killing capability has increased, hangar killing capability has decreased.
Title: Re: Ju88 change - bug or feature
Post by: 1stpar3 on September 14, 2018, 03:01:43 PM: Yes, even with PERFECT calibration...seems off a bit. I just assumed it was MY lack of sorties/practice in bombers. The drones never have seemed to "track" like they used too,so figured that was another issue to precision accuracy :uhoh