1
The O' Club / Re: Hey Animl, got some ammo for ya
« Last post by Tumor on Today at 09:25:22 PM »Doh. Sorry. It's not flyable.
It is available for AI without having the WWII Asset Pack.
Sorry mispoke.
lookitchu gettin me all excited.
Doh. Sorry. It's not flyable.
It is available for AI without having the WWII Asset Pack.
Sorry mispoke.
I tank quite often in IL-2 Finnish full realism server. Eastern front, long distances. No icons whatsoever, orientation by map and compass. That's something different and exciting. But one needs patience and ability to use compass and read map. If those skills are in smartphone zombie level, it won't work.
Well, as a mission ready F-106 pilot in the day, and qualified via the Nuclear Surety Program...
You can still get rides in a real f104 at kennedy space center from “starfighters”.
Next time I’m up doing aero testing and the pilots come over to see the cars, i’ll try to ask if any have tried the f104 in a sim.
Sorry. It may have been me. I've been having difficulty with the hot key to toggle my "things" on and off since the internet update.
What about Commodore and the Amiga? I was a fan back in the day.
Now I use Linux on everything by my gaming computers. I did run it on a gaming computer for a while but after a few patches breaking stuff I gave it up.
I've heard that Steam OS is decent for gaming but haven't gotten around to trying it yet. Anybody game on SteamOS?
This passage contains several instances of logical fallacies:
Ad Hominem: The author attacks individuals personally rather than addressing their arguments or points. For example, "Some of you literally run people out just to look tough harassing people unprovoked." and "Ya shoot your mouths off, ya earn a reply that hurt your fragile butts and ya quadruple down on being dipshts..."
Straw Man: Misrepresenting someone's argument to make it easier to attack. For example, "Ya blame everyone but yourself and gaslight every situation blaming the person you attacked unprovoked." There's no specific argument presented, but rather an exaggerated version of the opposing viewpoint.
Generalization: Making broad, sweeping statements about a group of people based on the actions of a few. For example, "This small group is a cancer." and "Others are right on the money, you deserve zero attention you beg for."
Appeal to Emotion: Trying to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument. For example, "Talk about someone unaware of themselves is pure projection of a professional victim 'poor me'." and "Ya really going to rampage a thread seeking tech answers? Pathedic."
Loaded Language: Using emotionally charged words to sway the reader without providing evidence or logical reasoning. For example, "The mental disorders are down right blinding."
Non Sequitur: Conclusions that do not logically follow from the premises. For example, "Its mysterious why numbers struggle?" This statement does not logically follow the preceding arguments.
These fallacies weaken the overall argument and make it less convincing.
There's still some around. Last week I saw a k4 that zoomed from the deck to 10k and it was one of them. I forget who as I don't pay that much attention to them.