Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: Fester' on August 11, 2001, 02:58:00 AM

Title: straffable acks on ships
Post by: Fester' on August 11, 2001, 02:58:00 AM
seams most combat reports indicate ships aaa was supressable by straffing.

most likely would die trying but so would they it seams
Title: straffable acks on ships
Post by: Ghosth on August 11, 2001, 08:47:00 AM
I have to agree, it would be nice to be able
to "wear down" the AA capability.

Individual turrets should be able to be destroyed, especially the 8" & 5" mannable guns.
Title: straffable acks on ships
Post by: Westy MOL on August 11, 2001, 08:49:00 AM
Agree 100%
Title: straffable acks on ships
Post by: GRUNHERZ on August 11, 2001, 08:50:00 AM
I agree. Make the ship ack killable with the EXACT same vulnerability as field acks.
Title: Re: straffable acks on ships
Post by: TheMan on August 08, 2008, 07:52:27 PM
seams most combat reports indicate ships aaa was supressable by straffing.

most likely would die trying but so would they it seams
I agree , this is a damn old post. Have seen it before soemwhere
Title: Re: straffable acks on ships
Post by: Motherland on August 08, 2008, 07:54:16 PM
I see a png coming someone's way.
Title: Re: straffable acks on ships
Post by: thndregg on August 08, 2008, 08:06:58 PM
this is a damn old post.

Having said that, read the rule regarding "damn old" posts.
Title: Re: straffable acks on ships
Post by: USRanger on August 08, 2008, 08:59:02 PM
As a small aside, why is bringing up old threads against the rules yet if someone asks a question/makes a statement that has been asked/said before, the "use the search button" police come out in full SWAT force?  It doesn't bother me because I do neither, but I thought it was kind of a funny observation.  The way it works, you're SUPPOSED to search for old related threads, yet DARE NOT post a reply to your newly discovered information.  Uhh, not quite sure why this one would be dug up though...  :huh
Title: Re: straffable acks on ships
Post by: Spikes on August 08, 2008, 09:53:25 PM
I agree , this is a damn old post. Have seen it before soemwhere
Sorry, but you're an idiot.
Title: Re: straffable acks on ships
Post by: DoNKeY on August 08, 2008, 10:17:48 PM
I always thought it was funny...  People would bump and old post and give their opinion, and people would flame them for punting it.  The same person could have started a new topic, and he'd just get told to search...

Ahh wth ranger :D.  Guess I should have read the whole thing.

Title: Re: straffable acks on ships
Post by: nimble on August 08, 2008, 10:18:21 PM
epic necro
Title: Re: straffable acks on ships
Post by: Bronk on August 08, 2008, 10:46:30 PM
epic numpty

Fixed... ohhh IN
Title: Re: straffable acks on ships
Post by: Bronk on August 08, 2008, 10:49:08 PM
As a small aside, why is bringing up old threads against the rules yet if someone asks a question/makes a statement that has been asked/said before, the "use the search button" police come out in full SWAT force?  It doesn't bother me because I do neither, but I thought it was kind of a funny observation.  The way it works, you're SUPPOSED to search for old related threads, yet DARE NOT post a reply to your newly discovered information.  Uhh, not quite sure why this one would be dug up though...  :huh
What question did he ask? What did he contribute?
Title: Re: straffable acks on ships
Post by: USRanger on August 08, 2008, 11:37:36 PM
If you read the last line of your quote, that was what I was referring to.  This one came from wayyy out in left field.
Title: Re: straffable acks on ships
Post by: Wyld45 on August 09, 2008, 12:13:16 AM



                          Whaaaaaat??......No,"Ack Ack"??   :confused:
Title: Re: straffable acks on ships
Post by: SD67 on August 09, 2008, 03:25:12 AM
hmmm anxiously awaiting Ack-Ack's ack ack...
Title: Re: straffable acks on ships
Post by: hyster on August 09, 2008, 05:58:59 AM
a couple of mnths back me and a couple of other guys sank all the ships bar the cv and totaly de-acked it apart from the front 5", so all the guns can be killed.
Title: Re: straffable acks on ships
Post by: halo342 on August 09, 2008, 11:43:51 AM
IN 
Title: Re: straffable acks on ships
Post by: Dragon on August 09, 2008, 12:17:16 PM
I took out most of the guns on a CV group the other day with several reeeaally fast passes in an Lgay7 with big gun package, so they can be straffed down, surviving is a bit tough though.
Title: Re: straffable acks on ships
Post by: AWwrgwy on August 09, 2008, 02:07:35 PM
As a small aside, why is bringing up old threads against the rules yet if someone asks a question/makes a statement that has been asked/said before, the "use the search button" police come out in full SWAT force?  It doesn't bother me because I do neither, but I thought it was kind of a funny observation.  The way it works, you're SUPPOSED to search for old related threads, yet DARE NOT post a reply to your newly discovered information.  Uhh, not quite sure why this one would be dug up though...  :huh

You have a question or an idea.  "What this game reeally needs is the B-29".  You do a SEARCH and read the pertinent threads.  You see the topic has been beat to death and there is nothing new to contribute.  YOU MOVE ALONG. 

There is no need to start a new thread.  There is no need to bump an ooooold thread.  Your inquiry has been answered with your search.

The point of people yelling SEARCH is, the answer is out there, you must only seek it out.




wrngway
Title: Re: straffable acks on ships
Post by: SkyRock on August 09, 2008, 02:35:58 PM
I agree , this is a damn old post. Have seen it before soemwhere
T
A
R
D
!